Paper · 2024 · International Journal of Research in Agronomy

Effect of different nitrogen levels and nano urea on growth and yield attributes of wheat under mid hills of Himachal Pradesh

Jyoti Bala; Kartikeya Choudhary; Ranjeet Singh Bochalya; et al.

7
claims
18
verbatim quotes
0
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

The current experiment was conducted at Chamelti Agriculture Farm, Shoolini University, Solan during rabi season of 2023-24 to study the effect of different nitrogen levels and nano urea on growth and yield attributes of wheat under mid hills of Himachal Pradesh. The soil of experimental field was sandy loam in texture, medium organic carbon, available nitrogen and potassium, high in phosphorous and neutral in reaction with EC in safer range. The field experiment was laid out in Split plot design consisting of four treatments in main plot and three treatments in sub plot. The treatments of main plot were comprising of four nitrogen levels viz., Control, 50% RDN, 75% RDN and 100% RDN (recommended dose of nitrogen) and three foliar spray of Nano urea in sub plot viz., CRI stage, Tillering stage and Jointing stage. The recommended doses of fertilizers were applied in each plot. The doses of phosphorous and potassium were applied as basal at the time of sowing through SSP and MOP. Nitrogen was applied in two split doses, half dose was applied through urea at the time of sowing as basal dose and remaining half dose was applied in two equal splits at the time of CRI and tillering stage. While, foliar application of nano urea was applied as per treatment @ 3 ml l-1 of water. Other operations were performed as per package of practices of this area. The results revealed that application of 100% RDN recorded significantly higher crop growth characters and yield attributes viz., plant height (cm), number of tillers (m-2), chlorophyll content, dry matter accumulation (g m-2), crop growth rate (g m-2 day-1), number of effective tillers (m-2) and number of grains spike-1. While, foliar spray of nano urea at jointing stage resulted in significantly higher plant height and chlorophyll content. However, Foliar spray of nano urea at tillering stage resulted in significantly higher number of tillers, dry matter accumulation, crop growth rate, number of effective tillers, number of grains spike-1. Spike length (cm) and test weight (g) was higher with the application of 100% RDN and nano urea at tillering stage but the difference was found to be non-significant.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 7

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Application of 100% RDN significantly increased plant height, number of tillers and chlorophyll content in wheat compared with control, 50% RDN and 75% RDN.

Treatment
100% RDNe3
Outcome
plant height (cm), number of tillers (m-2), chlorophyll contente3
Direction
highere3
Comparator
Control, 50% RDN, 75% RDNe2
Setting
Chamelti Agriculture Farm, Shoolini University, Solane1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“growth and yield attributes of wheat under mid hills of Himachal Pradesh”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 190–262 · show in text ↑
e1

“The current experiment was conducted at Chamelti Agriculture Farm, Shoolini University, Solan during rabi season of 2023-24”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–123 · show in text ↑
e2

“four nitrogen levels viz., Control, 50% RDN, 75% RDN and 100% RDN (recommended dose of nitrogen)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 626–722 · show in text ↑
e3

“application of 100% RDN recorded significantly higher crop growth characters and yield attributes viz., plant height (cm), number of tillers (m-2), chlorophyll content, dry matter accumulation (g m-2), crop growth rate (g m-2 day-1), number of effective tillers (m-2) and number of grains spike-1”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1389–1685 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Application of 100% RDN significantly increased dry matter accumulation, crop growth rate and number of effective tillers in wheat.

Treatment
100% RDNe3
Outcome
dry matter accumulation (g m-2), crop growth rate (g m-2 day-1), number of effective tillers (m-2)e3
Direction
highere3
Comparator
Control, 50% RDN, 75% RDNe2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“growth and yield attributes of wheat under mid hills of Himachal Pradesh”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 190–262 · show in text ↑
e2

“four nitrogen levels viz., Control, 50% RDN, 75% RDN and 100% RDN (recommended dose of nitrogen)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 626–722 · show in text ↑
e3

“application of 100% RDN recorded significantly higher crop growth characters and yield attributes viz., plant height (cm), number of tillers (m-2), chlorophyll content, dry matter accumulation (g m-2), crop growth rate (g m-2 day-1), number of effective tillers (m-2) and number of grains spike-1”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1389–1685 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Application of 100% RDN significantly increased the number of grains per spike in wheat.

Treatment
100% RDNe3
Outcome
number of grains spike-1e3
Direction
highere3
Comparator
Control, 50% RDN, 75% RDNe2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“growth and yield attributes of wheat under mid hills of Himachal Pradesh”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 190–262 · show in text ↑
e2

“four nitrogen levels viz., Control, 50% RDN, 75% RDN and 100% RDN (recommended dose of nitrogen)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 626–722 · show in text ↑
e3

“application of 100% RDN recorded significantly higher crop growth characters and yield attributes viz., plant height (cm), number of tillers (m-2), chlorophyll content, dry matter accumulation (g m-2), crop growth rate (g m-2 day-1), number of effective tillers (m-2) and number of grains spike-1”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1389–1685 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Foliar spray of nano urea at the jointing stage significantly increased plant height and chlorophyll content in wheat.

Treatment
foliar spray of nano urea at jointing stagee4
Outcome
plant height and chlorophyll contente4
Direction
highere4

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“growth and yield attributes of wheat under mid hills of Himachal Pradesh”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 190–262 · show in text ↑
e4

“foliar spray of nano urea at jointing stage resulted in significantly higher plant height and chlorophyll content”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1694–1807 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Foliar spray of nano urea at the tillering stage significantly increased the number of tillers, dry matter accumulation and crop growth rate in wheat.

Treatment
Foliar spray of nano urea at tillering stagee5
Outcome
number of tillers, dry matter accumulation, crop growth ratee5
Direction
highere5

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“growth and yield attributes of wheat under mid hills of Himachal Pradesh”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 190–262 · show in text ↑
e5

“Foliar spray of nano urea at tillering stage resulted in significantly higher number of tillers, dry matter accumulation, crop growth rate, number of effective tillers, number of grains spike-1”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1818–2011 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Foliar spray of nano urea at the tillering stage significantly increased the number of effective tillers and grains per spike in wheat.

Treatment
Foliar spray of nano urea at tillering stagee5
Outcome
number of effective tillers, number of grains spike-1e5
Direction
highere5

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“growth and yield attributes of wheat under mid hills of Himachal Pradesh”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 190–262 · show in text ↑
e5

“Foliar spray of nano urea at tillering stage resulted in significantly higher number of tillers, dry matter accumulation, crop growth rate, number of effective tillers, number of grains spike-1”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1818–2011 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Spike length and test weight were higher with 100% RDN and nano urea at tillering, but the difference was not significant.

Treatment
100% RDN and nano urea at tillering stagee6
Outcome
Spike length (cm) and test weight (g)e6
Direction
highere6

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“growth and yield attributes of wheat under mid hills of Himachal Pradesh”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 190–262 · show in text ↑
e6

“Spike length (cm) and test weight (g) was higher with the application of 100% RDN and nano urea at tillering stage but the difference was found to be non-significant”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2013–2178 · show in text ↑

nitrogen · quality: grain · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results differ

96 papers: 70 positive, 26 negative or no effect

25 papers in the same direction as this paper · 70 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
    Late soil nitrogen increased common wheat test weight by 1.4%.

    Late‐Season Nitrogen Increases Improver Common and Durum Wheat Quality · 2015 · compared with control without N fertilization after the vegetative growth stage

    Opposite direction

  3. positive

92 papers more in this group

See all 96 papers →

nanoparticle · quality: grain · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

22 papers: 20 positive, 2 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 20 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

18 papers more in this group

See all 22 papers →

tillage · quality: grain · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

48 papers: 32 positive, 16 negative or no effect

15 papers in the same direction as this paper · 32 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

44 papers more in this group

See all 48 papers →

nanoparticle · physiology: pigments · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

57 papers: 51 positive, 6 negative or no effect

50 papers in the same direction as this paper · 6 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

53 papers more in this group

See all 57 papers →

nitrogen · physiology: pigments · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

101 papers: 92 positive, 9 negative or no effect

91 papers in the same direction as this paper · 7 in the opposite direction · 2 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. negative

97 papers more in this group

See all 101 papers →

application · physiology: pigments · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

106 papers: 98 positive, 8 negative or no effect

97 papers in the same direction as this paper · 6 in the opposite direction · 2 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

102 papers more in this group

See all 106 papers →

nanoparticle · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

260 papers: 242 positive, 18 negative or no effect

241 papers in the same direction as this paper · 18 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

256 papers more in this group

See all 260 papers →

application · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

877 papers: 795 positive, 82 negative or no effect

794 papers in the same direction as this paper · 75 in the opposite direction · 7 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. no effect

873 papers more in this group

See all 877 papers →

8 of 10 groups shown: named compounds and organisms first, then groups whose results differ (checked claim by claim), then those with positive and negative results, then the smaller groups.

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.