Paper · 2021 · Agriculture

Effect of Soil Tillage Practice on Photosynthesis, Grain Yield and Quality of Hybrid Winter Wheat

Jan Buczek; Dagmara Migut; Marta Jańczak-Pieniążek

9
claims
21
verbatim quotes
31
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

Although the conventional tillage (CT) system dominates in the cultivation of wheat in Europe, currently, mainly for economic and environmental reasons, especially in the case of new varietal genotypes, reduced tillage systems (RT), including no-tillage (NT), are practised. The aim of the research was to evaluate the influence of tillage systems on yield, gas exchange parameters, chlorophyll fluorescence, and the quantity and quality of protein of hybrid winter wheat cultivars grown under various hydrothermal conditions in the years of the research. A field experiment was carried out between 2016 and 2019 in Domaradz (49°47′38′′ N, 21°56′54′′ E), Poland. The following factors were tested: three tillage systems—conventional (CT), reduced (RT) and no-tillage (NT), and five hybrid cultivars of winter wheat—Hybery, Hyking, Hymalaya, Hypocamp and Hyvento. The highest grain yield and the most favourable values of physiological parameters were found in the CT system in comparison to the reduced systems RT and NT. Unfavourable hydrothermal conditions with a deficit of precipitation during the 2018/2019 growing season resulted in a decrease in the grain yield and selected physiological parameters in the CT system, while they increased in the NT system. More favourable physiological parameters and higher yields resulted from cultivation of hybrid winter wheat in the CT system for cvs. Hymalaya and Hypocamp grain, and in the NT system for cv. Hyking. The use of the CT system in comparison to RT and NT resulted in a significant increase in the value of grain quality parameters and the content of the sum of gliadins and glutenins as well as γ, ω gliadins and HMW glutenins. No statistical differences were found in the content of albumin and globulin or α/β subunits of gliadins and LMW glutenins in the CT and RT systems. Cvs. Hyvento and Hyking, in the CT as well as in the RT and NT systems, obtained higher values of quality characteristics and fractions and subunits of gluten proteins, especially when low hydrothermal coefficients were recorded during the grain formation and ripening period (June–July).

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 9

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Conventional tillage had highest grain yield versus reduced and no tillage.

Taxon
hybrid winter wheatTriticum aestivume1
Treatment
CT systeme0
Outcome
grain yielde0
Direction
higheste0
Comparator
reduced systems RT and NTe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The highest grain yield and the most favourable values of physiological parameters were found in the CT system in comparison to the reduced systems RT and NT”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 863–1020 · show in text ↑
e1

“hybrid winter wheat cultivars”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 452–481 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Conventional tillage gave the most favorable physiological parameters.

Taxon
hybrid winter wheatTriticum aestivume1
Treatment
CT systeme0
Outcome
physiological parameterse0
Direction
most favourablee0
Comparator
reduced systems RT and NTe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The highest grain yield and the most favourable values of physiological parameters were found in the CT system in comparison to the reduced systems RT and NT”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 863–1020 · show in text ↑
e1

“hybrid winter wheat cultivars”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 452–481 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Dry 2018/2019 conditions decreased yield and physiology under CT.

Taxon
hybrid winter wheatTriticum aestivume1
Treatment
Unfavourable hydrothermal conditions with a deficit of precipitatione0
Outcome
grain yield and selected physiological parameterse0
Direction
decreasee0
Qualifier
during the 2018/2019 growing seasone0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Unfavourable hydrothermal conditions with a deficit of precipitation during the 2018/2019 growing season resulted in a decrease in the grain yield and selected physiological parameters in the CT system”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1022–1223 · show in text ↑
e1

“hybrid winter wheat cultivars”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 452–481 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Under dry 2018/2019 conditions yield and selected physiology increased under NT.

Taxon
hybrid winter wheatTriticum aestivume3
Treatment
NT systeme0
Outcome
grain yield and selected physiological parameterse1
Direction
increasede0
Qualifier
Unfavourable hydrothermal conditions with a deficit of precipitation during the 2018/2019 growing seasone2

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“while they increased in the NT system”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1225–1262 · show in text ↑
e1

“grain yield and selected physiological parameters”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1157–1206 · show in text ↑
e2

“Unfavourable hydrothermal conditions with a deficit of precipitation during the 2018/2019 growing season”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1022–1126 · show in text ↑
e3

“hybrid winter wheat cultivars”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 452–481 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Hymalaya and Hypocamp yielded better under CT.

Taxon
hybrid winter wheatTriticum aestivume1
Material
Hymalaya and Hypocampe0
Treatment
CT systeme0
Outcome
yieldse0
Direction
highere0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“More favourable physiological parameters and higher yields resulted from cultivation of hybrid winter wheat in the CT system for cvs. Hymalaya and Hypocamp grain”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1264–1425 · show in text ↑
e1

“hybrid winter wheat cultivars”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 452–481 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Hyking yielded better under NT.

Taxon
hybrid winter wheatTriticum aestivume2
Material
Hykinge0
Treatment
NT systeme0
Outcome
yieldse1
Direction
highere1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“and in the NT system for cv. Hyking”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1427–1462 · show in text ↑
e1

“More favourable physiological parameters and higher yields”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1264–1322 · show in text ↑
e2

“hybrid winter wheat cultivars”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 452–481 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

CT significantly increased grain quality and gliadin/glutenin content versus RT and NT.

Taxon
hybrid winter wheatTriticum aestivume1
Treatment
CT systeme0
Outcome
grain quality parameters and the content of the sum of gliadins and gluteninse0
Direction
increasee0
Comparator
RT and NTe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The use of the CT system in comparison to RT and NT resulted in a significant increase in the value of grain quality parameters and the content of the sum of gliadins and glutenins as well as γ, ω gliadins and HMW glutenins”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1464–1687 · show in text ↑
e1

“hybrid winter wheat cultivars”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 452–481 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Albumin, globulin, α/β gliadins and LMW glutenins did not differ statistically between CT and RT.

Taxon
hybrid winter wheatTriticum aestivume1
Treatment
CTe0
Outcome
content of albumin and globulin or α/β subunits of gliadins and LMW gluteninse0
Direction
No statistical differencese0
Comparator
RTe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“No statistical differences were found in the content of albumin and globulin or α/β subunits of gliadins and LMW glutenins in the CT and RT systems”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1689–1836 · show in text ↑
e1

“hybrid winter wheat cultivars”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 452–481 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Hyvento and Hyking had higher quality and gluten protein fractions across tillage systems, especially under low hydrothermal coefficients.

Taxon
hybrid winter wheatTriticum aestivume1
Material
Hyvento and Hykinge0
Outcome
quality characteristics and fractions and subunits of gluten proteinse0
Direction
highere0
Qualifier
low hydrothermal coefficientse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Cvs. Hyvento and Hyking, in the CT as well as in the RT and NT systems, obtained higher values of quality characteristics and fractions and subunits of gluten proteins, especially when low hydrothermal coefficients were recorded during the grain formation and ripening period (June–July)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1838–2125 · show in text ↑
e1

“hybrid winter wheat cultivars”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 452–481 · show in text ↑

rainfall · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results differ

81 papers: 32 positive, 49 negative or no effect

48 papers in the same direction as this paper · 32 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

77 papers more in this group

See all 81 papers →

tillage · quality: grain · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

48 papers: 32 positive, 16 negative or no effect

31 papers in the same direction as this paper · 15 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

44 papers more in this group

See all 48 papers →

tillage · molecular: metabolites · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

57 papers: 48 positive, 9 negative or no effect

8 papers in the same direction as this paper · 48 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

53 papers more in this group

See all 57 papers →

tillage · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

1,414 papers: 1,116 positive, 298 negative or no effect

1,115 papers in the same direction as this paper · 257 in the opposite direction · 41 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. positive

1,410 papers more in this group

See all 1,414 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.