Paper · 2026 · ACS Nano

Nanoenabled Priming Helps Wheat to Handle Heat and Disease

Tonghao Bai; Kaili Duan; Daiwei Zhuang; et al.

9
claims
13
verbatim quotes
0
citations
3
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Global wheat production faces growing threats from rising temperature and pathogen attacks under climate change. Here, we developed a nanoenabled seed priming strategy that simultaneously enhanced wheat thermotolerance and resistance to Fusarium head blight (FHB). Specifically, under heat shock stress (45 °C, 24 h), wheat seedlings that underwent AgSiO 2 NP (40 mg/L AgNPs + 40 mg/L SiO 2 NPs) seed priming exhibited reduced wilting symptoms, increased biomass (22.8%), improved water uptake, maintained cellular membrane integrity, and delayed protein/starch catabolism compared to the hydroprimed control. Reactive oxygen species (ROS) localization assays and RNA-seq analysis reveal that AgSiO 2 NP priming triggered ROS-mediated activation of “plant hormone signal transduction” and the “MAPK signaling pathway” in seeds. These molecular changes persisted into the seedling stage, establishing a primed state that enhanced seedlings’ heat resilience. AgSiO 2 NP-primed seedlings also showed enhanced resistance to Fusarium graminearum, even under hotter conditions (28 °C). Comparative transcriptomics of wheat seedlings pre- and postpathogen infection revealed that AgSiO 2 NP priming intensified defense-related pathways, including the MAPK signaling pathway, plant hormone signal transduction pathway, plant–pathogen interaction pathway, and specialized metabolite biosynthesis pathways, as compared to hydropriming, leading to robust immune activation and disease resistance during pathogen attack. We also demonstrate that an inexpensive ($0.5–2 per acre) and environmentally friendly alternative, CuO@SiO 2 nanoparticles, efficiently enhances the resistance of wheat seedlings to FHB. This study proposes a nontransgenic approach for engineering climate-resilient wheat, providing a sustainable strategy to address food insecurity exacerbated by climate change.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 9

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

AgSiO 2 NP priming reduced wheat seedling wilting under heat shock relative to hydropriming.

Treatment
AgSiO 2 NP (40 mg/L AgNPs + 40 mg/L SiO 2 NPs) seed priminge0
Outcome
wilting symptomse0
Direction
reducede0
Qualifier
heat shock stress (45 °C, 24 h)e0
Comparator
hydroprimed controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 26–31 · show in text ↑
e0

“under heat shock stress (45 °C, 24 h), wheat seedlings that underwent AgSiO 2 NP (40 mg/L AgNPs + 40 mg/L SiO 2 NPs) seed priming exhibited reduced wilting symptoms, increased biomass (22.8%), improved water uptake, maintained cellular membrane integrity, and delayed protein/starch catabolism compared to the hydroprimed control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 279–608 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Priming increased wheat seedling biomass by 22.8% under heat shock.

Treatment
AgSiO 2 NP (40 mg/L AgNPs + 40 mg/L SiO 2 NPs) seed priminge0
Outcome
biomasse0
Direction
increasede0
Value
22.8%e0
Comparator
hydroprimed controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“wheat seedlings that underwent AgSiO 2 NP (40 mg/L AgNPs + 40 mg/L SiO 2 NPs) seed priming exhibited reduced wilting symptoms, increased biomass (22.8%), improved water uptake, maintained cellular membrane integrity, and delayed protein/starch catabolism compared to the hydroprimed control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 318–608 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Priming improved wheat seedling water uptake under heat shock.

Treatment
AgSiO 2 NP (40 mg/L AgNPs + 40 mg/L SiO 2 NPs) seed priminge0
Outcome
water uptakee0
Direction
improvede0
Comparator
hydroprimed controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“wheat seedlings that underwent AgSiO 2 NP (40 mg/L AgNPs + 40 mg/L SiO 2 NPs) seed priming exhibited reduced wilting symptoms, increased biomass (22.8%), improved water uptake, maintained cellular membrane integrity, and delayed protein/starch catabolism compared to the hydroprimed control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 318–608 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Priming maintained wheat seedling membrane integrity under heat shock.

Treatment
AgSiO 2 NP (40 mg/L AgNPs + 40 mg/L SiO 2 NPs) seed priminge0
Outcome
cellular membrane integritye0
Direction
maintainede0
Comparator
hydroprimed controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“wheat seedlings that underwent AgSiO 2 NP (40 mg/L AgNPs + 40 mg/L SiO 2 NPs) seed priming exhibited reduced wilting symptoms, increased biomass (22.8%), improved water uptake, maintained cellular membrane integrity, and delayed protein/starch catabolism compared to the hydroprimed control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 318–608 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Priming delayed wheat seedling protein and starch catabolism under heat shock.

Treatment
AgSiO 2 NP (40 mg/L AgNPs + 40 mg/L SiO 2 NPs) seed priminge0
Outcome
protein/starch catabolisme0
Direction
delayede0
Comparator
hydroprimed controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“wheat seedlings that underwent AgSiO 2 NP (40 mg/L AgNPs + 40 mg/L SiO 2 NPs) seed priming exhibited reduced wilting symptoms, increased biomass (22.8%), improved water uptake, maintained cellular membrane integrity, and delayed protein/starch catabolism compared to the hydroprimed control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 318–608 · show in text ↑
Mechanismauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Priming triggered ROS-mediated hormone and MAPK pathway activation in wheat seeds.

Organ / stage
seedse0
Treatment
AgSiO 2 NP priminge0
Outcome
activation of “plant hormone signal transduction” and the “MAPK signaling pathway”e0
Qualifier
ROS-mediatede0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 26–31 · show in text ↑
e0

“AgSiO 2 NP priming triggered ROS-mediated activation of “plant hormone signal transduction” and the “MAPK signaling pathway” in seeds”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 693–826 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Priming enhanced wheat seedling resistance to Fusarium graminearum at 28 °C.

Treatment
AgSiO 2 NP-primede0
Interactor
Fusarium graminearumFusarium graminearume0pathogen
Outcome
resistance to Fusarium graminearume0
Direction
enhancede0
Qualifier
hotter conditions (28 °C)e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Fusarium graminearum
Fusarium graminearum · InteractorScot Nelson from Honolulu, USA · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 26–31 · show in text ↑
e0

“AgSiO 2 NP-primed seedlings also showed enhanced resistance to Fusarium graminearum, even under hotter conditions (28 °C)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 957–1078 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Priming intensified wheat seedling defense pathways after pathogen infection relative to hydropriming.

Treatment
AgSiO 2 NP priminge0
Outcome
defense-related pathwayse0
Direction
intensifiede0
Comparator
hydropriminge0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 26–31 · show in text ↑
e0

“AgSiO 2 NP priming intensified defense-related pathways, including the MAPK signaling pathway, plant hormone signal transduction pathway, plant–pathogen interaction pathway, and specialized metabolite biosynthesis pathways, as compared to hydropriming”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1173–1424 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

CuO@SiO 2 nanoparticles enhanced wheat seedling resistance to FHB.

Treatment
CuO@SiO 2 nanoparticlese0
Interactor
FHBe0pathogen
Outcome
resistance of wheat seedlings to FHBe0
Direction
enhancese0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“CuO@SiO 2 nanoparticles, efficiently enhances the resistance of wheat seedlings to FHB”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1609–1695 · show in text ↑

silver nanoparticle · growth · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results differ

17 papers: 13 positive, 4 negative or no effect

12 papers in the same direction as this paper · 4 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

13 papers more in this group

See all 17 papers →

silicon dioxide · growth · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results differ

20 papers: 15 positive, 5 negative or no effect

14 papers in the same direction as this paper · 4 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

16 papers more in this group

See all 20 papers →

silver nanoparticle · quality: protein · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect

1 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
See all 2 papers →

silicon dioxide · disease · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

4 papers: 3 positive, 1 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. positive
See all 4 papers →

silicon dioxide · physiology: water · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

silver nanoparticle · physiology: water · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

silicon dioxide · quality: protein · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results agree

3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

seed treatment · quality: protein · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

13 papers: 12 positive, 1 negative or no effect

11 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive

9 papers more in this group

See all 13 papers →

8 of 16 groups shown: named compounds and organisms first, then groups whose results differ (checked claim by claim), then those with positive and negative results, then the smaller groups.

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.