Intervention effectmodel-written summary

BCFE priming improved shoot total protein under high salinity.

A claim from Mitigation of Salinity Stress in Wheat Seedlings Due to the Application of Phytohormone-Rich Culture Filtrate Extract of Methylotrophic Actinobacterium Nocardioides sp. NIMMe6 · 2020

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

BCFE priming improved shoot total protein under high salinity.

Organ / stage
shoote0
Treatment
BCFE primed seedse0
Outcome
total proteine0
Value
42.01e0

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleComparatorSettingDirectionQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“biochemical accumulation (total protein 42.01 and 28.75 mg g-1 in shoot and root tissues at 10 dS m-1 in BCFE primed seeds)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 741–864
t0

“Wheat Seedlings”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 33–48

Title

Mitigation of Salinity Stress in Wheat Seedlings Due to the Application of Phytohormone-Rich Culture Filtrate Extract of Methylotrophic Actinobacterium Nocardioides sp. NIMMe6

Kamlesh K. Meena; Utkarsh M. Bitla; Ajay M. Sorty; et al. Frontiers in Microbiology 2020. doi:10.3389/fmicb.2020.02091

Other claims from this paper (9)

Record rev-70fb4663fd6bfe3f477d7bf769c33dc8c8ea9b54611ed869cd2ae2b00a04a606 · schema claims-v0.9 · position 4 in the model’s answer

seed treatment · quality: protein · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

13 papers: 12 positive, 1 negative or no effect

11 papers in the same direction as this claim · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive
  4. positive
  5. positive
  6. positive
  7. positive
  8. positive

4 papers more in this group

See all 13 papers →

botanical · quality: protein · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

24 papers: 17 positive, 7 negative or no effect

16 papers in the same direction as this claim · 7 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative
  4. negative
  5. negative
  6. negative
  7. negative
  8. positive

15 papers more in this group

See all 24 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.