Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Silica nanoparticle pretreatment alleviated copper oxide nanoparticle root growth inhibition in wheat.

A claim from Species-specific modulation of nitro-oxidative stress and root growth in monocots by silica nanoparticle pretreatment under copper oxide nanoparticle stress · 2025

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Silica nanoparticle pretreatment alleviated copper oxide nanoparticle root growth inhibition in wheat.

Treatment
SiO 2 NP pretreatmente0
Outcome
CuO NP-induced root growth inhibitione0
Direction
alleviatede0

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleComparatorSettingValueQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“SiO 2 NP pretreatment alleviated CuO NP-induced root growth inhibition in sorghum, wheat, and rye but intensified it in triticale.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 864–994

Title

Species-specific modulation of nitro-oxidative stress and root growth in monocots by silica nanoparticle pretreatment under copper oxide nanoparticle stress

Kamilla Kovács; Ádám Szierer; Enikő Mészáros; et al. BMC Plant Biology 2025. doi:10.1186/s12870-025-06193-7

Other claims from this paper (8)

Record rev-4aaefb7f6772ea89956135866b3df891eda4e27389d7d70673b77be1f34b2201 · schema claims-v0.9 · position 2 in the model’s answer

silicon dioxide · disease · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

4 papers: 3 positive, 1 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this claim · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. positive
See all 4 papers →

nanoparticle · disease · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

37 papers: 32 positive, 5 negative or no effect

31 papers in the same direction as this claim · 5 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. negative
  4. negative
  5. no effect
  6. positive
  7. positive
  8. positive

28 papers more in this group

See all 37 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.