Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Nano-Fe3O4 at 2000 mg/L significantly decreased the growth inhibition caused by heavy metals at 1 mM.

A claim from Magnetic (Fe3O4) Nanoparticles Reduce Heavy Metals Uptake and Mitigate Their Toxicity in Wheat Seedling · 2017

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Nano-Fe3O4 at 2000 mg/L significantly decreased the growth inhibition caused by heavy metals at 1 mM.

Treatment
magnetic (Fe3O4) nanoparticles (2000 mg/L)e2
Outcome
growth inhibitione2
Direction
decreasede2
Comparator
each heavy metal solution (1 mM)e2

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleSettingValueQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Wheat Seedling”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 89–103
e2

“Addition of magnetic (Fe3O4) nanoparticles (2000 mg/L) in each heavy metal solution (1 mM) significantly decreased the growth inhibition and activated protective mechanisms to reduce oxidative stress induced by heavy metals in the wheat seedlings”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1044–1290

Title

Magnetic (Fe3O4) Nanoparticles Reduce Heavy Metals Uptake and Mitigate Their Toxicity in Wheat Seedling

Alexandre Konate; Xiao He; Zhiyong Zhang; et al. Sustainability 2017. doi:10.3390/su9050790

Other claims from this paper (8)

Record rev-f8672217a337c614ebd6e9409996227d1a455bc8646f73f3aae929075816e2fa · schema claims-v0.9 · position 5 in the model’s answer

nanoparticle · disease · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

37 papers: 32 positive, 5 negative or no effect

31 papers in the same direction as this claim · 5 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. negative
  4. negative
  5. no effect
  6. positive
  7. positive
  8. positive

28 papers more in this group

See all 37 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.