Paper · 2009 · Journal of Phytopathology

Wheat Resistance to Spot Blotch Potentiated by Silicon

Gisele Pereira Domiciano; Fabrício Avila Rodrigues; Francisco Xavier Ribeiro Vale; et al.

14
claims
27
verbatim quotes
55
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Spot blotch, caused by the fungus Bipolaris sorokiniana, is one of the most important diseases on wheat. The effects of silicon (Si) on this wheat disease were studied. Plants of wheat cultivars BR-18 and BRS-208 were grown in plastic pots containing Si-deficient soil amended with either calcium silicate (+Si) or calcium carbonate (−Si). The content of Si in leaf tissue was significantly increased by 90.5% for the +Si treatment. There was no significant difference between Si treatments for calcium content, so variations in Si accounted for differences in the level of resistance to spot blotch. The incubation period was significantly increased by 40% for the +Si treatment. The area under spot blotch progress curve, number of lesions per cm2 of leaf area, and real disease severity significantly decreased by 62, 36 and 43.5% in +Si treatment. There was no significant effect of Si on lesion size. The role played by total soluble phenolics in the increased resistance to spot blotch of plants from both cultivars supplied with Si was not clear. Plants from cultivar BR-18 supplied with Si showed the highest values for concentration of lignin-thioglycolic acid derivatives during the most advanced stages of fungus infection. Chitinase activity was high at the most advanced stages of fungus infection on leaves from both cultivars supplied with Si and may have had an effect on fungus growth based on the reduction of the components of resistance evaluated. Peroxidase activity was found to be high only at 96 h after inoculation of both cultivars supplied with Si. Polyphenoloxidase activity had no apparent effect on resistance regardless of Si treatments. Results revealed that supplying Si to wheat plants can increase resistance against spot blotch.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 14

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Silicon supply increased wheat leaf silicon content by 90.5%.

Treatment
+Si treatmente0
Outcome
content of Si in leaf tissuee0
Direction
increasede0
Value
90.5%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The content of Si in leaf tissue was significantly increased by 90.5% for the +Si treatment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 340–431 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–5 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Calcium content did not significantly differ between silicon treatments.

Treatment
Si treatmentse0
Outcome
calcium contente0
Direction
no significant differencee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“There was no significant difference between Si treatments for calcium content”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 433–510 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–5 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Silicon supply increased the incubation period by 40%.

Treatment
+Si treatmente0
Outcome
incubation periode0
Direction
increasede0
Value
40%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The incubation period was significantly increased by 40% for the +Si treatment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 601–679 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–5 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Silicon supply decreased the area under the spot blotch progress curve by 62%.

Treatment
+Si treatmente0
Outcome
area under spot blotch progress curvee0
Direction
decreasede0
Value
62e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The area under spot blotch progress curve, number of lesions per cm2 of leaf area, and real disease severity significantly decreased by 62, 36 and 43.5% in +Si treatment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 681–850 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–5 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Silicon supply decreased lesions per cm2 of leaf area by 36%.

Treatment
+Si treatmente0
Outcome
number of lesions per cm2 of leaf areae0
Direction
decreasede0
Value
36e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The area under spot blotch progress curve, number of lesions per cm2 of leaf area, and real disease severity significantly decreased by 62, 36 and 43.5% in +Si treatment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 681–850 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–5 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Silicon supply decreased real disease severity by 43.5%.

Treatment
+Si treatmente0
Outcome
real disease severitye0
Direction
decreasede0
Value
43.5%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The area under spot blotch progress curve, number of lesions per cm2 of leaf area, and real disease severity significantly decreased by 62, 36 and 43.5% in +Si treatment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 681–850 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–5 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Silicon had no significant effect on lesion size.

Treatment
Sie0
Outcome
lesion sizee0
Direction
no significant effecte0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“There was no significant effect of Si on lesion size”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 852–904 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–5 · show in text ↑
Associationauthor interpretationoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The role of soluble phenolics in silicon-associated resistance was unclear.

Treatment
Sie0
Outcome
increased resistance to spot blotche0
Qualifier
was not cleare0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The role played by total soluble phenolics in the increased resistance to spot blotch of plants from both cultivars supplied with Si was not clear”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 906–1052 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–5 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Silicon-supplied BR-18 plants had the highest lignin-thioglycolic acid derivative concentrations at advanced infection stages.

Material
BR-18e0
Treatment
Sie0
Outcome
concentration of lignin-thioglycolic acid derivativese0
Direction
higheste0
Qualifier
most advanced stages of fungus infectione0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Plants from cultivar BR-18 supplied with Si showed the highest values for concentration of lignin-thioglycolic acid derivatives during the most advanced stages of fungus infection”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1054–1233 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–5 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Chitinase activity was high in silicon-supplied leaves of both cultivars at advanced infection stages.

Organ / stage
leavese0
Treatment
Sie0
Gene
Chitinasee0
Outcome
Chitinase activitye0
Direction
highe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Chitinase activity was high at the most advanced stages of fungus infection on leaves from both cultivars supplied with Si”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1235–1357 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–5 · show in text ↑
Mechanismauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Chitinase may have affected fungal growth.

Gene
Chitinasee0
Outcome
fungus growthe0
Qualifier
may have had an effecte0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Chitinase activity was high at the most advanced stages of fungus infection on leaves from both cultivars supplied with Si and may have had an effect on fungus growth based on the reduction of the components of resistance evaluated”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1235–1466 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–5 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Peroxidase activity was high only 96 hours after inoculation in silicon-supplied plants.

Gene
Peroxidasee0
Outcome
Peroxidase activitye0
Direction
highe0
Qualifier
96 h after inoculatione0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Peroxidase activity was found to be high only at 96 h after inoculation of both cultivars supplied with Si”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1468–1574 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–5 · show in text ↑
Associationauthor interpretationoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Polyphenoloxidase activity had no apparent effect on resistance across silicon treatments.

Treatment
Si treatmentse0
Gene
Polyphenoloxidasee0
Outcome
resistancee0
Direction
no apparent effecte0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Polyphenoloxidase activity had no apparent effect on resistance regardless of Si treatments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1576–1667 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–5 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors concluded silicon supply can increase wheat resistance to spot blotch.

Outcome
supplying Si to wheat plants can increase resistance against spot blotche0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“supplying Si to wheat plants can increase resistance against spot blotch”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1691–1763 · show in text ↑

silicon atom · disease · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

19 papers: 16 positive, 3 negative or no effect

15 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. negative

15 papers more in this group

See all 19 papers →

silicon atom · molecular: metabolites · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

34 papers: 32 positive, 2 negative or no effect

31 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. positive

30 papers more in this group

See all 34 papers →

silicon atom · nutrient: content · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

61 papers: 58 positive, 3 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper · 58 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

57 papers more in this group

See all 61 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.