Paper · 2022 · Siberian Herald of Agricultural Science

Testing of macro- and micronutrient nanoparticles on grain crops

V. N. Timofeev; O. A. Vyushina

11
claims
22
verbatim quotes
2
citations
3
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

The studies were conducted in the northern forest-steppe of the Tyumen region. Under laboratory and field conditions, different forms and dosages of macro- and micronutrient nanoparticles and associated substances were tested in the treatment of seeds and plants of spring triticale and wheat. The preparations had a positive effect on seed germination, while higher rates reduced energy and germination. The germination energy and germination of triticale seeds increased by 4-10% with the application of preparations containing nanoparticles of copper, manganese, molybdenum, biogenic iron, Titan M. Treatment of daily seedlings with manganese, calcium, molybdenum, Titan M, biogenic iron, boron, potassium increased sprout length by 7.8-25% and sprout weight by 6-8% by day 7. Only already developing sprouts responded to the application of potassium. It was noted that the application of biogenic iron causes a 4-10% decrease in laboratory germination of seeds, but promotes the development of the main root. Its increase was 9-12% compared to the control. The inclusion of biogenic iron and silicon in the mixture to the chemical dressing reduced the effectiveness against root rot from 18% at the beginning of the growing season to 30% by the harvesting period. The application of biogenic iron increased the yield by 0,5-0,6 t/ha or 23% in the system of complex crop protection compared to the control and by 0,16-0,23 t/ha with the standard scheme of crop protection. A positive effect of biogenic iron in the treatment of plants during the earing phase as a separate element of the technology and in a tank mixture with fungicides was noted.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 11

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmixedmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Preparations improved seed germination, while higher rates reduced germination energy and germination.

Taxon
spring triticale and wheatTriticum aestivum×Triticosecalee1
Treatment
preparationse0
Outcome
seed germinatione0
Direction
positive effecte0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
x Triticosecale
×Triticosecale · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryMiquel Pujol Palol · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The preparations had a positive effect on seed germination, while higher rates reduced energy and germination.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 294–404 · show in text ↑
e1

“spring triticale and wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 266–292 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Nanoparticle preparations increased triticale germination energy and germination by 4-10%.

Taxon
triticale×Triticosecalee0
Treatment
preparations containing nanoparticles of copper, manganese, molybdenum, biogenic iron, Titan Me0
Outcome
germination energy and germinatione0
Direction
increasede0
Value
4-10%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

x Triticosecale
×Triticosecale · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryMiquel Pujol Palol · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The germination energy and germination of triticale seeds increased by 4-10% with the application of preparations containing nanoparticles of copper, manganese, molybdenum, biogenic iron, Titan M.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 405–601 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Seedling treatments increased sprout length by 7.8-25%.

Taxon
spring triticale and wheatTriticum aestivum×Triticosecalee1
Treatment
manganese, calcium, molybdenum, Titan M, biogenic iron, boron, potassiume0
Outcome
sprout lengthe0
Direction
increasede0
Value
7.8-25%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
x Triticosecale
×Triticosecale · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryMiquel Pujol Palol · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Treatment of daily seedlings with manganese, calcium, molybdenum, Titan M, biogenic iron, boron, potassium increased sprout length by 7.8-25% and sprout weight by 6-8% by day 7.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 602–779 · show in text ↑
e1

“spring triticale and wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 266–292 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Seedling treatments increased sprout weight by 6-8%.

Taxon
spring triticale and wheatTriticum aestivum×Triticosecalee1
Treatment
manganese, calcium, molybdenum, Titan M, biogenic iron, boron, potassiume0
Outcome
sprout weighte0
Direction
increasede0
Value
6-8%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
x Triticosecale
×Triticosecale · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryMiquel Pujol Palol · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Treatment of daily seedlings with manganese, calcium, molybdenum, Titan M, biogenic iron, boron, potassium increased sprout length by 7.8-25% and sprout weight by 6-8% by day 7.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 602–779 · show in text ↑
e1

“spring triticale and wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 266–292 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Only developing sprouts responded to potassium.

Taxon
spring triticale and wheatTriticum aestivum×Triticosecalee1
Organ / stage
already developing sproutse0
Treatment
application of potassiume0
Outcome
respondede0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
x Triticosecale
×Triticosecale · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryMiquel Pujol Palol · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Only already developing sprouts responded to the application of potassium.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 780–854 · show in text ↑
e1

“spring triticale and wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 266–292 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Biogenic iron decreased laboratory seed germination by 4-10%.

Taxon
spring triticale and wheatTriticum aestivum×Triticosecalee1
Treatment
application of biogenic irone0
Outcome
laboratory germination of seedse0
Direction
decreasee0
Value
4-10%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
x Triticosecale
×Triticosecale · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryMiquel Pujol Palol · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the application of biogenic iron causes a 4-10% decrease in laboratory germination of seeds”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 873–964 · show in text ↑
e1

“spring triticale and wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 266–292 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Biogenic iron increased main root growth by 9-12% versus control.

Taxon
spring triticale and wheatTriticum aestivum×Triticosecalee2
Treatment
application of biogenic irone1
Outcome
development of the main roote0
Direction
increasee0
Value
9-12%e0
Comparator
controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
x Triticosecale
×Triticosecale · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryMiquel Pujol Palol · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“promotes the development of the main root. Its increase was 9-12% compared to the control.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 970–1060 · show in text ↑
e1

“application of biogenic iron causes a 4-10% decrease in laboratory germination of seeds”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 877–964 · show in text ↑
e2

“spring triticale and wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 266–292 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Biogenic iron and silicon reduced chemical dressing effectiveness against root rot.

Taxon
spring triticale and wheatTriticum aestivum×Triticosecalee1
Treatment
inclusion of biogenic iron and silicon in the mixture to the chemical dressinge0
Outcome
effectiveness against root rote0
Direction
reducede0
Value
18%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
x Triticosecale
×Triticosecale · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryMiquel Pujol Palol · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The inclusion of biogenic iron and silicon in the mixture to the chemical dressing reduced the effectiveness against root rot from 18% at the beginning of the growing season to 30% by the harvesting period.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1061–1267 · show in text ↑
e1

“spring triticale and wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 266–292 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Biogenic iron increased yield by 0,5-0,6 t/ha or 23% under complex crop protection versus control.

Taxon
spring triticale and wheatTriticum aestivum×Triticosecalee1
Treatment
application of biogenic irone0
Outcome
yielde0
Direction
increasede0
Value
0,5-0,6 t/hae0
Qualifier
system of complex crop protectione0
Comparator
controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
x Triticosecale
×Triticosecale · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryMiquel Pujol Palol · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The application of biogenic iron increased the yield by 0,5-0,6 t/ha or 23% in the system of complex crop protection compared to the control and by 0,16-0,23 t/ha with the standard scheme of crop protection.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1268–1475 · show in text ↑
e1

“spring triticale and wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 266–292 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Biogenic iron increased yield by 0,16-0,23 t/ha under standard crop protection.

Taxon
spring triticale and wheatTriticum aestivum×Triticosecalee1
Treatment
application of biogenic irone0
Outcome
yielde0
Direction
increasede0
Value
0,16-0,23 t/hae0
Qualifier
standard scheme of crop protectione0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
x Triticosecale
×Triticosecale · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryMiquel Pujol Palol · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The application of biogenic iron increased the yield by 0,5-0,6 t/ha or 23% in the system of complex crop protection compared to the control and by 0,16-0,23 t/ha with the standard scheme of crop protection.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1268–1475 · show in text ↑
e1

“spring triticale and wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 266–292 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Biogenic iron had a positive effect when applied at earing alone or with fungicides.

Taxon
spring triticale and wheatTriticum aestivum×Triticosecalee1
Organ / stage
earing phasee0
Treatment
biogenic irone0
Outcome
positive effecte0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
x Triticosecale
×Triticosecale · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryMiquel Pujol Palol · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“A positive effect of biogenic iron in the treatment of plants during the earing phase as a separate element of the technology and in a tank mixture with fungicides was noted.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1476–1650 · show in text ↑
e1

“spring triticale and wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 266–292 · show in text ↑

iron atom · growth · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results differ

54 papers: 41 positive, 13 negative or no effect

40 papers in the same direction as this paper · 12 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

50 papers more in this group

See all 54 papers →

iron atom · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results differ

99 papers: 92 positive, 7 negative or no effect

91 papers in the same direction as this paper · 7 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

95 papers more in this group

See all 99 papers →

manganese atom · growth · x Triticosecale (triticale)Positive and negative results

5 papers: 4 positive, 1 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. positive

1 paper more in this group

See all 5 papers →

iron atom · disease · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

6 papers: 3 positive, 3 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

2 papers more in this group

See all 6 papers →

silicon atom · disease · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

19 papers: 16 positive, 3 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper · 16 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

15 papers more in this group

See all 19 papers →

molybdenum atom · growth · x Triticosecale (triticale)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

iron atom · growth · x Triticosecale (triticale)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

titanium atom · growth · x Triticosecale (triticale)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

8 of 10 groups shown: named compounds and organisms first, then groups whose results differ (checked claim by claim), then those with positive and negative results, then the smaller groups.

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.