Paper · 2000 · Indian Journal of Agricultural Research

Effect of sulphur and micronutrients on growth, nutrient content and yield of wheat (Triticum aestivum L.).

Sudhir Shukla; A. S. Warsi

12
claims
22
verbatim quotes
11
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

All the growth characters (LAI, LAR, NAR, RGR and dry matter accumulation) were higher at high fertility (120, 60, 60 kg NPK/ha). Maximum LAI was observed at 75 DAS (5.36), LAR at 30 DAS (163 74 cm/g), NAR at 60–75 DAS (8.31 g/m/day) and RGR at 30–45 (80.65 mg) g/day) crop growth periods. Among micronutrients, zinc application increased the different growth parametres and yield followed by sulphur and manganese. Iron and boron did not influence the growth and yield of wheat significantly. Zinc, manganese and boron content was higher in grain than straw whereas iron and sulphur content was higher in straw.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 12

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

High fertility increased all stated wheat growth characters.

Treatment
high fertility (120, 60, 60 kg NPK/ha)e0
Outcome
growth characters (LAI, LAR, NAR, RGR and dry matter accumulation)e0
Direction
highere0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“All the growth characters (LAI, LAR, NAR, RGR and dry matter accumulation) were higher at high fertility (120, 60, 60 kg NPK/ha).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–129 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 78–83 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Leaf area index reached a maximum of 5.36 at 75 days after sowing.

Organ / stage
75 DASe0
Outcome
LAIe0
Direction
Maximume0
Value
5.36e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Maximum LAI was observed at 75 DAS (5.36)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 130–171 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 78–83 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Leaf area ratio reached its maximum at 30 days after sowing.

Organ / stage
30 DASe0
Outcome
LARe0
Value
163 74 cm/ge0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“LAR at 30 DAS (163 74 cm/g)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 173–200 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 78–83 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Net assimilation rate reached its maximum at 60–75 days after sowing.

Organ / stage
60–75 DASe0
Outcome
NARe0
Value
8.31 g/m/daye0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“NAR at 60–75 DAS (8.31 g/m/day)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 202–233 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 78–83 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Relative growth rate reached its maximum during the 30–45 crop growth period.

Organ / stage
30–45e0
Outcome
RGRe0
Value
80.65 mg) g/daye0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“RGR at 30–45 (80.65 mg) g/day) crop growth periods”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 238–288 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 78–83 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Zinc application increased wheat growth parameters and yield.

Treatment
zinc applicatione0
Outcome
growth parametres and yielde0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“zinc application increased the different growth parametres and yield followed by sulphur and manganese”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 312–414 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 78–83 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Sulphur ranked after zinc for wheat growth and yield response.

Outcome
followed by sulphure0
Direction
followed by sulphure0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“zinc application increased the different growth parametres and yield followed by sulphur and manganese”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 312–414 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 78–83 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Manganese ranked after sulphur for wheat growth and yield response.

Outcome
followed by sulphur and manganesee0
Direction
followed by sulphur and manganesee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“zinc application increased the different growth parametres and yield followed by sulphur and manganese”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 312–414 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 78–83 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Iron did not significantly influence wheat growth and yield.

Treatment
Irone0
Outcome
growth and yielde0
Direction
did not influencee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Iron and boron did not influence the growth and yield of wheat significantly.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 416–493 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Boron did not significantly influence wheat growth and yield.

Treatment
borone0
Outcome
growth and yielde0
Direction
did not influencee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Iron and boron did not influence the growth and yield of wheat significantly.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 416–493 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Zinc, manganese and boron contents were higher in wheat grain than straw.

Organ / stage
graine0
Outcome
Zinc, manganese and boron contente0
Direction
highere0
Comparator
strawe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Zinc, manganese and boron content was higher in grain than straw”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 494–558 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 78–83 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Iron and sulphur contents were higher in wheat straw than grain.

Organ / stage
strawe0
Outcome
iron and sulphur contente0
Direction
highere0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“iron and sulphur content was higher in straw”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 567–611 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 78–83 · show in text ↑

boron atom · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results differ

76 papers: 62 positive, 14 negative or no effect

13 papers in the same direction as this paper · 62 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

72 papers more in this group

See all 76 papers →

iron atom · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results differ

99 papers: 92 positive, 7 negative or no effect

6 papers in the same direction as this paper · 92 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive

95 papers more in this group

See all 99 papers →

zinc atom · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results differ

511 papers: 456 positive, 55 negative or no effect

455 papers in the same direction as this paper · 49 in the opposite direction · 6 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. negative

507 papers more in this group

See all 511 papers →

fertilization · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

3,438 papers: 3,115 positive, 323 negative or no effect

3,114 papers in the same direction as this paper · 284 in the opposite direction · 39 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. negative

3,434 papers more in this group

See all 3,438 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.