Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Boron did not significantly influence wheat growth and yield.

A claim from Effect of sulphur and micronutrients on growth, nutrient content and yield of wheat (Triticum aestivum L.). · 2000

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Boron did not significantly influence wheat growth and yield.

Treatment
borone0
Outcome
growth and yielde0
Direction
did not influencee0

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleComparatorSettingValueQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Iron and boron did not influence the growth and yield of wheat significantly.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 416–493

Title

Effect of sulphur and micronutrients on growth, nutrient content and yield of wheat (Triticum aestivum L.).

Sudhir Shukla; A. S. Warsi Indian Journal of Agricultural Research 2000

Other claims from this paper (11)

Record rev-93e5ef5eed75fa37bcd7c4d1b70919f3b231cebfa4b5d9189f4360cc0a77a8e1 · schema claims-v0.9 · position 10 in the model’s answer

boron atom · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results differ

76 papers: 62 positive, 14 negative or no effect

13 papers in the same direction as this claim · 62 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
  4. positive
  5. positive
  6. positive
  7. positive
  8. positive

67 papers more in this group

See all 76 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.