Abstract

Cadmium (Cd) contamination in soil adversely affects crop productivity, grain quality, and human health. Applications of boron (B) and biochar are known to impart tolerance to crops against abiotic stresses. A pot experiment was performed to assess the effects of the sole and combined application of B and biochar on growth, physiological and antioxidant defense mechanisms, yield, and grain quality of wheat under Cd toxicity-induced stress. The treatments included control (0 mg kg−1 and 0 g kg−1), only Cd (15 mg kg−1), only B (5 g kg−1), only biochar (50 g kg−1), B plus biochar, Cd plus B, Cd plus biochar, and Cd plus B plus biochar, which were applied at the time of sowing and were arranged using completely randomized design (CRD) with five replications. The individual Cd toxicity (15 mg kg−1) significantly reduced chl a, chl b, and chl a+b, as well as primary metabolites (soluble protein, amino acids, total soluble sugar, and phenolic contents), while it increased the activities of enzymatic antioxidants like superoxide dismutase (SOD), peroxidase (POD), catalase (CAT), and ascorbate peroxidase (APX) in the leaves of wheat. In addition, Cd stress (15 mg kg−1) increased lipid peroxidation in the form of malondialdehyde (MDA), and it enhanced the hydrogen peroxide (H2O2) content, electrolyte leakage (EL), and proline contents in the leaves. Furthermore, Cd (15 mg kg−1) contamination reduced the grain yield and yield-related attributes relative to respective no-Cd treatments. Soil-applied B and biochar improved wheat grain yield by triggering the activities of enzymatic antioxidants. Individual or combined B and biochar applications improved proline contents and reduced H2O2 and MDA contents in plants. The combined application of B and biochar enhanced soluble sugars and total phenolic as compared to the control and Cd-contaminated plants. In conclusion, the combined application of B and biochar was found to be the best soil amendment strategy to improve the yield of wheat under Cd-contaminated soil.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 15

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Cadmium reduced wheat leaf chlorophyll a, b and total chlorophyll.

Treatment
Cd toxicity (15 mg kg−1)e0
Outcome
chl a, chl b, and chl a+be0
Direction
reducede0

Not reportedOrgan / stageComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The individual Cd toxicity (15 mg kg−1) significantly reduced chl a, chl b, and chl a+b”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 765–852 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 33–38 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Cadmium reduced soluble protein, amino acids and total soluble sugar in wheat leaves.

Treatment
Cd toxicity (15 mg kg−1)e0
Outcome
soluble protein, amino acids, total soluble sugare0
Direction
reducede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The individual Cd toxicity (15 mg kg−1) significantly reduced chl a, chl b, and chl a+b, as well as primary metabolites (soluble protein, amino acids, total soluble sugar, and phenolic contents)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 765–959 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 33–38 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Cadmium reduced wheat leaf phenolic contents.

Treatment
Cd toxicity (15 mg kg−1)e0
Outcome
phenolic contentse0
Direction
reducede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The individual Cd toxicity (15 mg kg−1) significantly reduced chl a, chl b, and chl a+b, as well as primary metabolites (soluble protein, amino acids, total soluble sugar, and phenolic contents)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 765–959 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 33–38 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Cadmium increased wheat leaf SOD, POD and CAT activities.

Treatment
Cadmiumt0
Outcome
superoxide dismutase (SOD), peroxidase (POD), catalase (CAT)e0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“it increased the activities of enzymatic antioxidants like superoxide dismutase (SOD), peroxidase (POD), catalase (CAT), and ascorbate peroxidase (APX) in the leaves of wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 967–1141 · show in text ↑
t0

“Cadmium”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 15–22 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Cadmium increased APX activity in wheat leaves.

Treatment
Cadmiumt0
Outcome
ascorbate peroxidase (APX)e0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“it increased the activities of enzymatic antioxidants like superoxide dismutase (SOD), peroxidase (POD), catalase (CAT), and ascorbate peroxidase (APX) in the leaves of wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 967–1141 · show in text ↑
t0

“Cadmium”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 15–22 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Cadmium increased malondialdehyde in wheat leaves.

Treatment
Cd stress (15 mg kg−1)e0
Outcome
malondialdehyde (MDA)e0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Cd stress (15 mg kg−1) increased lipid peroxidation in the form of malondialdehyde (MDA)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1156–1244 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 33–38 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Cadmium enhanced hydrogen peroxide and electrolyte leakage in wheat leaves.

Treatment
Cadmiumt0
Outcome
hydrogen peroxide (H2O2) content, electrolyte leakage (EL)e0
Direction
enhancede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“it enhanced the hydrogen peroxide (H2O2) content, electrolyte leakage (EL), and proline contents in the leaves”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1250–1360 · show in text ↑
t0

“Alleviation of Cadmium Stress in Wheat through the Combined Application of Boron and Biochar via Regulating Morpho-Physiological and Antioxidant Defense Mechanisms”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–163 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Cadmium enhanced proline in wheat leaves.

Treatment
Cadmiumt0
Outcome
proline contentse0
Direction
enhancede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“it enhanced the hydrogen peroxide (H2O2) content, electrolyte leakage (EL), and proline contents in the leaves”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1250–1360 · show in text ↑
t0

“Alleviation of Cadmium Stress in Wheat through the Combined Application of Boron and Biochar via Regulating Morpho-Physiological and Antioxidant Defense Mechanisms”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–163 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Cadmium reduced grain yield and yield attributes versus no cadmium.

Treatment
Cd (15 mg kg−1) contaminatione0
Outcome
grain yield and yield-related attributese0
Direction
reducede0
Comparator
no-Cd treatmentse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Cd (15 mg kg−1) contamination reduced the grain yield and yield-related attributes relative to respective no-Cd treatments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1375–1497 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 33–38 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Soil boron improved wheat grain yield.

Treatment
Be0
Outcome
grain yielde0
Direction
improvede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Soil-applied B and biochar improved wheat grain yield by triggering the activities of enzymatic antioxidants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1499–1607 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Soil biochar improved wheat grain yield.

Treatment
biochare0
Outcome
grain yielde0
Direction
improvede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Soil-applied B and biochar improved wheat grain yield by triggering the activities of enzymatic antioxidants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1499–1607 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Boron or biochar increased proline and reduced hydrogen peroxide and malondialdehyde.

Treatment
B and biochar applicationse0
Outcome
proline contentse0
Direction
improvede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Individual or combined B and biochar applications improved proline contents and reduced H2O2 and MDA contents in plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1609–1728 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 33–38 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Boron and biochar applications reduced wheat H2O2 and MDA.

Treatment
B and biochar applicationse0
Outcome
H2O2 and MDA contentse0
Direction
reducede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Individual or combined B and biochar applications improved proline contents and reduced H2O2 and MDA contents in plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1609–1728 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 33–38 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Combined boron and biochar raised soluble sugars and total phenolics versus controls and cadmium.

Treatment
combined application of B and biochare0
Outcome
soluble sugars and total phenolice0
Direction
enhancede0
Comparator
the control and Cd-contaminated plantse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The combined application of B and biochar enhanced soluble sugars and total phenolic as compared to the control and Cd-contaminated plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1730–1868 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 33–38 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors recommend combined boron and biochar for wheat yield on cadmium contaminated soil.

Outcome
combined application of B and biochare0
Qualifier
under Cd-contaminated soile0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the combined application of B and biochar was found to be the best soil amendment strategy to improve the yield of wheat under Cd-contaminated soil”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1885–2032 · show in text ↑

cadmium atom · physiology: osmolytes · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results differ

10 papers: 4 positive, 6 negative or no effect

5 papers in the same direction as this paper · 4 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

6 papers more in this group

See all 10 papers →

cadmium atom · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results differ

26 papers: 5 positive, 21 negative or no effect

20 papers in the same direction as this paper · 5 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

22 papers more in this group

See all 26 papers →

cadmium atom · physiology: oxidative · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results differ

47 papers: 4 positive, 43 negative or no effect

42 papers in the same direction as this paper · 4 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. negative
  3. positive

43 papers more in this group

See all 47 papers →

boron atom · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results differ

76 papers: 62 positive, 14 negative or no effect

61 papers in the same direction as this paper · 12 in the opposite direction · 2 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. no effect

72 papers more in this group

See all 76 papers →

cadmium atom · quality: phytochemicals · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

4 papers: 1 positive, 3 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. negative
  3. negative
See all 4 papers →

biochar · physiology: osmolytes · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results differ

6 papers: 6 positive, 0 negative or no effect

5 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

2 papers more in this group

See all 6 papers →

heavy metal · quality: phytochemicals · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

4 papers: 2 positive, 2 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. negative
See all 4 papers →

heavy metal · physiology: osmolytes · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

9 papers: 1 positive, 8 negative or no effect

7 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. negative
  3. negative

5 papers more in this group

See all 9 papers →

8 of 11 groups shown: named compounds and organisms first, then groups whose results differ (checked claim by claim), then those with positive and negative results, then the smaller groups.

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.