Paper · 1996 · Arid Soil Research and Rehabilitation

Response of field‐grown wheat to inoculation withAzospirillum brasilenseandbacillus polymyxain the semiarid region of Argentina

E. A. Rodríguez Cáceres; G.González Anta; J. R. López; et al.

15
claims
27
verbatim quotes
36
citations
3
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Abstract Field experiments were carried out at the INTA Bordenave Agriculture Experiment Station to determine the effect of Azospirillum brasilense and Bacillus polymyxa on the yield of wheat. Seeds were inoculated with different strains of A. brasilense and a strain of B. polymyxa. Sowing was performed with 100 kg seed ha‐1 at the beginning of winter for the period 1987–1991. Azospirillum brasilense strain Az 39 increased yields of the Cochicó INTA wheat cultivar by 13.4% in 1988–1989; 24.3% in 1990–1991, and 15.5% in 1991–1992. Yields of cultivar Buck Poncho increased by 21.6%, and of Prointa Pigüé by 20.8% and 33.3% during the latter two periods. In one out of two cropping cycles, A. brasilense strain Cd increased yield of the Cochicó INTA cultivar by 25.7%. Other strains did not affect yields significantly. Strain Az 39 increased wheat yields in an unfertilized soil but not if the soil was amended with 19 kg N ha‐1 as urea. Inoculation of Cochicó INTA seeds with B. polymyxa Bp 4317 increased yield by 13.6% and 19.5% in two different years. When the bacterium was co‐inoculated with A. brasilense Cd, no synergistic effect on yield was observed. However, it increased yield of cultivar Prointa Pigüé by 20.1%. Grain protein content was not influenced by inoculation. The results suggest that wheat growing in semiarid regions of Argentina (about 2 million ha) could benefit from seed inoculation if bacterial strains and wheat cultivars are carefully selected and soil conditions are appropriate. Key words: Azospirillum brasilense Bacillus polymyxa seed inoculationsemiarid conditionswheat yield

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 15

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Az 39 increased Cochicó INTA wheat yield by 13.4% in 1988–1989.

Material
Cochicó INTAe0
Treatment
Azospirillum brasilense strain Az 39e0
Interactor
Azospirillum brasilenseAzospirillum brasilensee0symbiont
Outcome
yieldse0
Direction
increasede0
Value
13.4%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Azospirillum brasilense
Azospirillum brasilense · InteractorCristiane Colodel · CC BY 4.0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Azospirillum brasilense strain Az 39 increased yields of the Cochicó INTA wheat cultivar by 13.4% in 1988–1989”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 380–490 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Az 39 increased Cochicó INTA wheat yield by 24.3% in 1990–1991.

Material
Cochicó INTAe0
Treatment
Azospirillum brasilense strain Az 39e0
Interactor
Azospirillum brasilenseAzospirillum brasilensee0symbiont
Outcome
yieldse0
Direction
increasede0
Value
24.3%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Azospirillum brasilense
Azospirillum brasilense · InteractorCristiane Colodel · CC BY 4.0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Azospirillum brasilense strain Az 39 increased yields of the Cochicó INTA wheat cultivar by 13.4% in 1988–1989; 24.3% in 1990–1991”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 380–510 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Az 39 increased Cochicó INTA wheat yield by 15.5% in 1991–1992.

Material
Cochicó INTAe0
Treatment
Azospirillum brasilense strain Az 39e0
Interactor
Azospirillum brasilenseAzospirillum brasilensee0symbiont
Outcome
yieldse0
Direction
increasede0
Value
15.5%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Azospirillum brasilense
Azospirillum brasilense · InteractorCristiane Colodel · CC BY 4.0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Azospirillum brasilense strain Az 39 increased yields of the Cochicó INTA wheat cultivar by 13.4% in 1988–1989; 24.3% in 1990–1991, and 15.5% in 1991–1992”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 380–534 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Buck Poncho yield increased by 21.6% with Az 39.

Material
Buck Ponchoe0
Treatment
Azospirillum brasilense strain Az 39e1
Interactor
Azospirillum brasilenseAzospirillum brasilenset0symbiont
Outcome
Yieldse0
Direction
increasede0
Value
21.6%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Azospirillum brasilense
Azospirillum brasilense · InteractorCristiane Colodel · CC BY 4.0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Yields of cultivar Buck Poncho increased by 21.6%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 536–585 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat to inoculation withAzospirillum brasilense”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 24–72 · show in text ↑
e1

“Azospirillum brasilense strain Az 39 increased yields of the Cochicó INTA wheat cultivar by 13.4% in 1988–1989”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 380–490 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Prointa Pigüé yield increased by 20.8% with Az 39.

Material
Prointa Pigüée0
Treatment
Azospirillum brasilenset0
Interactor
Azospirillum brasilenseAzospirillum brasilenset0symbiont
Outcome
Yieldse0
Direction
increasede0
Value
20.8%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Azospirillum brasilense
Azospirillum brasilense · InteractorCristiane Colodel · CC BY 4.0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Yields of cultivar Buck Poncho increased by 21.6%, and of Prointa Pigüé by 20.8% and 33.3% during the latter two periods”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 536–656 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat to inoculation withAzospirillum brasilense”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 24–72 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Prointa Pigüé yield increased by 33.3% with Az 39.

Material
Prointa Pigüée0
Treatment
Azospirillum brasilenset0
Interactor
Azospirillum brasilenseAzospirillum brasilenset0symbiont
Outcome
Yieldse0
Direction
increasede0
Value
33.3%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Azospirillum brasilense
Azospirillum brasilense · InteractorCristiane Colodel · CC BY 4.0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Yields of cultivar Buck Poncho increased by 21.6%, and of Prointa Pigüé by 20.8% and 33.3% during the latter two periods”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 536–656 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat to inoculation withAzospirillum brasilense”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 24–72 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Strain Cd increased Cochicó INTA yield by 25.7% in one of two cycles.

Material
Cochicó INTAe0
Treatment
A. brasilense strain Cde0
Interactor
A. brasilenseAzospirillum brasilensee0symbiont
Outcome
yielde0
Direction
increasede0
Value
25.7%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Azospirillum brasilense
Azospirillum brasilense · InteractorCristiane Colodel · CC BY 4.0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“A. brasilense strain Cd increased yield of the Cochicó INTA cultivar by 25.7%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 693–770 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 24–29 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Other inoculant strains did not significantly affect yield.

Treatment
Other strainse0
Outcome
yieldse0
Direction
did not affecte0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Other strains did not affect yields significantly”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 772–821 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 24–29 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Az 39 increased wheat yield in unfertilized soil.

Treatment
Strain Az 39e0
Interactor
Azospirillum brasilenseAzospirillum brasilenset0symbiont
Outcome
yieldse0
Direction
increasede0
Setting
unfertilized soile0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Azospirillum brasilense
Azospirillum brasilense · InteractorCristiane Colodel · CC BY 4.0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Strain Az 39 increased wheat yields in an unfertilized soil”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 823–882 · show in text ↑
t0

“Azospirillum brasilense”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 49–72 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Az 39 did not increase yield when soil received urea.

Treatment
Strain Az 39e0
Outcome
yieldse0
Direction
note0
Qualifier
19 kg N ha‐1 as ureae0
Setting
soile0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Strain Az 39 increased wheat yields in an unfertilized soil but not if the soil was amended with 19 kg N ha‐1 as urea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 823–940 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Bp 4317 increased Cochicó INTA yield by 13.6% in one year.

Material
Cochicó INTAe0
Treatment
Inoculation of Cochicó INTA seeds with B. polymyxa Bp 4317e0
Interactor
B. polymyxaPaenibacillus polymyxae0symbiont
Outcome
yielde0
Direction
increasede0
Value
13.6%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Paenibacillus polymyxa
Paenibacillus polymyxa · InteractorDr. W.A. Clark · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Inoculation of Cochicó INTA seeds with B. polymyxa Bp 4317 increased yield by 13.6% and 19.5% in two different years”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 942–1058 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 24–29 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Bp 4317 increased Cochicó INTA yield by 19.5% in another year.

Material
Cochicó INTAe0
Treatment
Inoculation of Cochicó INTA seeds with B. polymyxa Bp 4317e0
Interactor
B. polymyxaPaenibacillus polymyxae0symbiont
Outcome
yielde0
Direction
increasede0
Value
19.5%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Paenibacillus polymyxa
Paenibacillus polymyxa · InteractorDr. W.A. Clark · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Inoculation of Cochicó INTA seeds with B. polymyxa Bp 4317 increased yield by 13.6% and 19.5% in two different years”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 942–1058 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 24–29 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Co-inoculation of Bp 4317 and Cd showed no synergistic yield effect.

Treatment
co‐inoculated with A. brasilense Cde0
Interactor
A. brasilenseAzospirillum brasilensee0symbiont
Outcome
synergistic effect on yielde0
Direction
noe0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Azospirillum brasilense
Azospirillum brasilense · InteractorCristiane Colodel · CC BY 4.0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“When the bacterium was co‐inoculated with A. brasilense Cd, no synergistic effect on yield was observed”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1060–1163 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 24–29 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The bacterial treatment increased Prointa Pigüé yield by 20.1%.

Material
Prointa Pigüée0
Treatment
bacillus polymyxat0
Interactor
bacillus polymyxaPaenibacillus polymyxat0symbiont
Outcome
yielde0
Direction
increasede0
Value
20.1%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Paenibacillus polymyxa
Paenibacillus polymyxa · InteractorDr. W.A. Clark · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“However, it increased yield of cultivar Prointa Pigüé by 20.1%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1165–1227 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat to inoculation withAzospirillum brasilenseandbacillus polymyxa”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 24–92 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Inoculation did not influence grain protein content.

Treatment
inoculatione0
Outcome
Grain protein contente0
Direction
not influencede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Grain protein content was not influenced by inoculation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1229–1284 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 24–29 · show in text ↑

cadmium atom · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results differ

26 papers: 5 positive, 21 negative or no effect

4 papers in the same direction as this paper · 20 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

22 papers more in this group

See all 26 papers →

Azospirillum brasilense · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results differ

36 papers: 32 positive, 4 negative or no effect

31 papers in the same direction as this paper · 4 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

32 papers more in this group

See all 36 papers →

Paenibacillus polymyxa · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results agree

3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

inoculation · quality: protein · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

65 papers: 57 positive, 8 negative or no effect

7 papers in the same direction as this paper · 57 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

61 papers more in this group

See all 65 papers →

inoculation · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

614 papers: 549 positive, 65 negative or no effect

548 papers in the same direction as this paper · 60 in the opposite direction · 5 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

610 papers more in this group

See all 614 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.