Paper · 2018 · Brazilian Journal of Microbiology

Plant growth promoting rhizobacteria reduce aphid population and enhance the productivity of bread wheat

Muhammad Naeem; Zubair Aslam; Abdul Khaliq; et al.

9
claims
24
verbatim quotes
56
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by-nc-nd

Abstract

Plant growth promoting rhizobacteria increase plant growth and give protection against insect pests and pathogens. Due to the negative impact of chemical pesticides on environment, alternatives to these chemicals are needed. In this scenario, the biological methods of pest control offer an eco-friendly and an attractive option. In this study, the effect of two plant growth promoting rhizobacterial strains (Bacillus sp. strain 6 and Pseudomonas sp. strain 6K) on aphid population and wheat productivity was evaluated in an aphid susceptible (Pasban-90) and resistant (Inqlab-91) wheat cultivar. The seeds were inoculated with each PGPR strain, separately or the combination of both. The lowest aphid population (2.1 tiller−1), and highest plant height (85.8 cm), number of spikelets per spike (18), grains per spike (44), productive tillers (320 m−2), straw yield (8.6 Mg ha−1), and grain yield (4.8 Mg ha−1) were achieved when seeds were inoculated with Bacillus sp. strain 6 + Pseudomonas sp. strain 6K. The grain yield of both varieties was enhanced by 35.5–38.9% with seed inoculation with both bacterial strains. Thus, the combine use of both PGPR strains viz. Bacillus sp. strain 6 + Pseudomonas sp. strain 6K offers an attractive option to reduce aphid population tied with better wheat productivity.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by-nc-nd. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 9

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Seeds inoculated with Bacillus sp. strain 6 + Pseudomonas sp. strain 6K had the lowest aphid population, 2.1 per tiller, in wheat.

Taxon
bread wheatTriticum aestivumt0
Treatment
inoculated with Bacillus sp. strain 6 + Pseudomonas sp. strain 6Ke2
Interactor
aphide1pest
Second interactor
Bacillus sp. strain 6e2biocontrol_agent
Outcome
aphid populatione1
Direction
loweste1
Value
2.1 tiller−1e1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“bread wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 93–104 · show in text ↑
e1

“The lowest aphid population (2.1 tiller−1)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 686–728 · show in text ↑
e2

“when seeds were inoculated with Bacillus sp. strain 6 + Pseudomonas sp. strain 6K”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 926–1007 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Seeds inoculated with both strains gave the highest plant height, 85.8 cm.

Taxon
bread wheatTriticum aestivumt0
Treatment
inoculated with Bacillus sp. strain 6 + Pseudomonas sp. strain 6Ke2
Interactor
Bacillus sp. strain 6e2symbiont
Second interactor
Pseudomonas sp. strain 6KPseudomonas sp.e2symbiont
Outcome
plant heighte1
Direction
higheste1
Value
85.8 cme1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Pseudomonas sp.
Pseudomonas sp. · Second interactor · picture of its genus (no picture of exactly this name)CDC · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“bread wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 93–104 · show in text ↑
e1

“highest plant height (85.8 cm)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 734–764 · show in text ↑
e2

“when seeds were inoculated with Bacillus sp. strain 6 + Pseudomonas sp. strain 6K”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 926–1007 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Seeds inoculated with both strains gave the highest number of spikelets per spike, 18.

Taxon
bread wheatTriticum aestivumt0
Treatment
inoculated with Bacillus sp. strain 6 + Pseudomonas sp. strain 6Ke2
Interactor
Bacillus sp. strain 6e2symbiont
Second interactor
Pseudomonas sp. strain 6KPseudomonas sp.e2symbiont
Outcome
number of spikelets per spikee1
Direction
higherinferrede1
Value
18e1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Pseudomonas sp.
Pseudomonas sp. · Second interactor · picture of its genus (no picture of exactly this name)CDC · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“bread wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 93–104 · show in text ↑
e1

“number of spikelets per spike (18)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 766–800 · show in text ↑
e2

“when seeds were inoculated with Bacillus sp. strain 6 + Pseudomonas sp. strain 6K”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 926–1007 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Seeds inoculated with both strains gave the highest number of grains per spike, 44.

Taxon
bread wheatTriticum aestivumt0
Treatment
inoculated with Bacillus sp. strain 6 + Pseudomonas sp. strain 6Ke2
Interactor
Bacillus sp. strain 6e2symbiont
Second interactor
Pseudomonas sp. strain 6KPseudomonas sp.e2symbiont
Outcome
grains per spikee1
Direction
higherinferrede1
Value
44e1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Pseudomonas sp.
Pseudomonas sp. · Second interactor · picture of its genus (no picture of exactly this name)CDC · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“bread wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 93–104 · show in text ↑
e1

“grains per spike (44)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 802–823 · show in text ↑
e2

“when seeds were inoculated with Bacillus sp. strain 6 + Pseudomonas sp. strain 6K”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 926–1007 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Seeds inoculated with both strains gave the highest number of productive tillers, 320 per m2.

Taxon
bread wheatTriticum aestivumt0
Treatment
inoculated with Bacillus sp. strain 6 + Pseudomonas sp. strain 6Ke2
Interactor
Bacillus sp. strain 6e2symbiont
Second interactor
Pseudomonas sp. strain 6KPseudomonas sp.e2symbiont
Outcome
productive tillerse1
Direction
higherinferrede1
Value
320 m−2e1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Pseudomonas sp.
Pseudomonas sp. · Second interactor · picture of its genus (no picture of exactly this name)CDC · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“bread wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 93–104 · show in text ↑
e1

“productive tillers (320 m−2)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 825–853 · show in text ↑
e2

“when seeds were inoculated with Bacillus sp. strain 6 + Pseudomonas sp. strain 6K”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 926–1007 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Seeds inoculated with both strains gave the highest straw yield, 8.6 Mg per ha.

Taxon
bread wheatTriticum aestivumt0
Treatment
inoculated with Bacillus sp. strain 6 + Pseudomonas sp. strain 6Ke2
Interactor
Bacillus sp. strain 6e2symbiont
Second interactor
Pseudomonas sp. strain 6KPseudomonas sp.e2symbiont
Outcome
straw yielde1
Direction
higherinferrede1
Value
8.6 Mg ha−1e1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Pseudomonas sp.
Pseudomonas sp. · Second interactor · picture of its genus (no picture of exactly this name)CDC · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“bread wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 93–104 · show in text ↑
e1

“straw yield (8.6 Mg ha−1)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 855–880 · show in text ↑
e2

“when seeds were inoculated with Bacillus sp. strain 6 + Pseudomonas sp. strain 6K”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 926–1007 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Seeds inoculated with both strains gave the highest grain yield, 4.8 Mg per ha.

Taxon
bread wheatTriticum aestivumt0
Treatment
inoculated with Bacillus sp. strain 6 + Pseudomonas sp. strain 6Ke2
Interactor
Bacillus sp. strain 6e2symbiont
Second interactor
Pseudomonas sp. strain 6KPseudomonas sp.e2symbiont
Outcome
grain yielde1
Direction
higherinferrede1
Value
4.8 Mg ha−1e1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Pseudomonas sp.
Pseudomonas sp. · Second interactor · picture of its genus (no picture of exactly this name)CDC · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“bread wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 93–104 · show in text ↑
e1

“grain yield (4.8 Mg ha−1)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 886–911 · show in text ↑
e2

“when seeds were inoculated with Bacillus sp. strain 6 + Pseudomonas sp. strain 6K”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 926–1007 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Seed inoculation with both bacterial strains enhanced grain yield of both wheat varieties by 35.5-38.9%.

Taxon
bread wheatTriticum aestivumt0
Material
both varietiese1
Treatment
seed inoculation with both bacterial strainse1
Interactor
bacterial strainse1symbiont
Outcome
grain yielde1
Direction
enhancede1
Value
35.5–38.9%e1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“bread wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 93–104 · show in text ↑
e1

“The grain yield of both varieties was enhanced by 35.5–38.9% with seed inoculation with both bacterial strains”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1009–1119 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors conclude that combined use of Bacillus sp. strain 6 and Pseudomonas sp. strain 6K is an attractive option to reduce aphid population together with better wheat productivity.

Outcome
reduce aphid population tied with better wheat productivitye1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“the combine use of both PGPR strains viz. Bacillus sp. strain 6 + Pseudomonas sp. strain 6K offers an attractive option to reduce aphid population tied with better wheat productivity”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1127–1309 · show in text ↑

Pseudomonas · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results differ

24 papers: 23 positive, 1 negative or no effect

22 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive

20 papers more in this group

See all 24 papers →

Pseudomonas · growth · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

27 papers: 25 positive, 2 negative or no effect

24 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. positive

23 papers more in this group

See all 27 papers →

Pseudomonas · pest · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

inoculation · pest · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

24 papers: 22 positive, 2 negative or no effect

21 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. positive

20 papers more in this group

See all 24 papers →

inoculation · growth · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

532 papers: 476 positive, 56 negative or no effect

475 papers in the same direction as this paper · 55 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. no effect

528 papers more in this group

See all 532 papers →

inoculation · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

614 papers: 549 positive, 65 negative or no effect

548 papers in the same direction as this paper · 60 in the opposite direction · 5 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

610 papers more in this group

See all 614 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.