Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Pseudomonas colonized roots best without affecting growth.

A claim from Enhanced Growth of Wheat and Soybean Plants Inoculated with Azospirillum brasilense Is Not Necessarily Due to General Enhancement of Mineral Uptake · 1990

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Pseudomonas colonized roots best without affecting growth.

Taxon
wheat and soybeanGlycine maxTriticum aestivumt0
Treatment
Pseudomonas sp.e0
Interactor
Pseudomonas sp.Pseudomonase0symbiont
Outcome
plant growthe0
Direction
no effecte0

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageSecond interactorSecond interactor roleComparatorSettingValueQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Glycine max
Glycine max · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Pseudomonas
Pseudomonas · Interactor · picture of the genus (one of its species)CDC · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the best root colonizer, Pseudomonas sp., had no effect on plant growth”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 670–741
t0

“Wheat and Soybean”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 19–36

Title

Enhanced Growth of Wheat and Soybean Plants Inoculated with Azospirillum brasilense Is Not Necessarily Due to General Enhancement of Mineral Uptake

Yoav Bashan; S. Kent Harrison; Robert E. Whitmoyer Applied and Environmental Microbiology 1990. doi:10.1128/aem.56.3.769-775.1990

Other claims from this paper (11)

Record rev-dac2baaabc628a97787148b7880019324c3e1bc06b73966e2a44a17d07f23ed5 · schema claims-v0.9 · position 5 in the model’s answer

Pseudomonas · growth · Glycine max (soybean)Positive and negative results

8 papers: 5 positive, 3 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this claim · 5 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
  4. positive
  5. positive
  6. no effect
  7. no effect
See all 8 papers →

Pseudomonas · growth · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

27 papers: 25 positive, 2 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this claim · 25 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
  4. positive
  5. positive
  6. positive
  7. positive
  8. positive

18 papers more in this group

See all 27 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.