Abstract
Wheat seeds inoculated with two isolates each of Azotobacter and Pseudomonas were sown in the field receiving fertilizer input of NPK @ 120-75-50 kg ha-1, respectively. Control was treated with sterilized inocula. Inoculation with Azotobacter significantly increased the grain yield (upto 19.3%), straw yield (upto 19.5%), plant height (upto 5.2%), number of tillers (upto 16.4%), spikelets (upto 7.0%) and total N-uptake (upto 58.6%) over uninoculated control. Similarly, inoculation with Pseudomonas promoted grain and straw yield, plant height, number of tillers, spikelets and total N-uptake upto 20.4, 14.2, 4.3, 16.8, 4.2 and 65.5%, respectively over uninoculated control. The effects of inoculation treatments on spike length and 1000-grain weight were non-significant.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 13
Claim · model-written summary
Azotobacter inoculation increased wheat grain yield by up to 19.3% over uninoculated control.
- Taxon
- Wheat
Triticum aestivume0 - Treatment
- Inoculation with Azotobactere1
- Interactor
- Azotobacter
Azotobactere1symbiont - Outcome
- grain yielde1
- Direction
- increasede1
- Value
- 19.3%e1
- Comparator
- uninoculated controle1
- Setting
- fielde0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Wheat seeds inoculated with two isolates each of Azotobacter and Pseudomonas were sown in the field receiving fertilizer input of NPK @ 120-75-50 kg ha-1”
e1“Inoculation with Azotobacter significantly increased the grain yield (upto 19.3%), straw yield (upto 19.5%), plant height (upto 5.2%), number of tillers (upto 16.4%), spikelets (upto 7.0%) and total N-uptake (upto 58.6%) over uninoculated control”
Claim · model-written summary
Azotobacter inoculation increased wheat straw yield by up to 19.5% over uninoculated control.
- Taxon
- WheatTriticum aestivume0
- Treatment
- Inoculation with Azotobactere1
- Interactor
- AzotobacterAzotobactere1symbiont
- Outcome
- straw yielde1
- Direction
- increasede1
- Value
- 19.5%e1
- Comparator
- uninoculated controle1
- Setting
- fielde0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Wheat seeds inoculated with two isolates each of Azotobacter and Pseudomonas were sown in the field receiving fertilizer input of NPK @ 120-75-50 kg ha-1”
e1“Inoculation with Azotobacter significantly increased the grain yield (upto 19.3%), straw yield (upto 19.5%), plant height (upto 5.2%), number of tillers (upto 16.4%), spikelets (upto 7.0%) and total N-uptake (upto 58.6%) over uninoculated control”
Claim · model-written summary
Azotobacter inoculation increased wheat plant height by up to 5.2% over uninoculated control.
- Taxon
- WheatTriticum aestivume0
- Treatment
- Inoculation with Azotobactere1
- Interactor
- AzotobacterAzotobactere1symbiont
- Outcome
- plant heighte1
- Direction
- increasede1
- Value
- 5.2%e1
- Comparator
- uninoculated controle1
- Setting
- fielde0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Wheat seeds inoculated with two isolates each of Azotobacter and Pseudomonas were sown in the field receiving fertilizer input of NPK @ 120-75-50 kg ha-1”
e1“Inoculation with Azotobacter significantly increased the grain yield (upto 19.3%), straw yield (upto 19.5%), plant height (upto 5.2%), number of tillers (upto 16.4%), spikelets (upto 7.0%) and total N-uptake (upto 58.6%) over uninoculated control”
Claim · model-written summary
Azotobacter inoculation increased the number of wheat tillers by up to 16.4% over uninoculated control.
- Taxon
- WheatTriticum aestivume0
- Treatment
- Inoculation with Azotobactere1
- Interactor
- AzotobacterAzotobactere1symbiont
- Outcome
- number of tillerse1
- Direction
- increasede1
- Value
- 16.4%e1
- Comparator
- uninoculated controle1
- Setting
- fielde0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Wheat seeds inoculated with two isolates each of Azotobacter and Pseudomonas were sown in the field receiving fertilizer input of NPK @ 120-75-50 kg ha-1”
e1“Inoculation with Azotobacter significantly increased the grain yield (upto 19.3%), straw yield (upto 19.5%), plant height (upto 5.2%), number of tillers (upto 16.4%), spikelets (upto 7.0%) and total N-uptake (upto 58.6%) over uninoculated control”
Claim · model-written summary
Azotobacter inoculation increased the number of wheat spikelets by up to 7.0% over uninoculated control.
- Taxon
- WheatTriticum aestivume0
- Treatment
- Inoculation with Azotobactere1
- Interactor
- AzotobacterAzotobactere1symbiont
- Outcome
- spikeletse1
- Direction
- increasede1
- Value
- 7.0%e1
- Comparator
- uninoculated controle1
- Setting
- fielde0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Wheat seeds inoculated with two isolates each of Azotobacter and Pseudomonas were sown in the field receiving fertilizer input of NPK @ 120-75-50 kg ha-1”
e1“Inoculation with Azotobacter significantly increased the grain yield (upto 19.3%), straw yield (upto 19.5%), plant height (upto 5.2%), number of tillers (upto 16.4%), spikelets (upto 7.0%) and total N-uptake (upto 58.6%) over uninoculated control”
Claim · model-written summary
Azotobacter inoculation increased total N-uptake of wheat by up to 58.6% over uninoculated control.
- Taxon
- WheatTriticum aestivume0
- Treatment
- Inoculation with Azotobactere1
- Interactor
- AzotobacterAzotobactere1symbiont
- Outcome
- total N-uptakee1
- Direction
- increasede1
- Value
- 58.6%e1
- Comparator
- uninoculated controle1
- Setting
- fielde0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Wheat seeds inoculated with two isolates each of Azotobacter and Pseudomonas were sown in the field receiving fertilizer input of NPK @ 120-75-50 kg ha-1”
e1“Inoculation with Azotobacter significantly increased the grain yield (upto 19.3%), straw yield (upto 19.5%), plant height (upto 5.2%), number of tillers (upto 16.4%), spikelets (upto 7.0%) and total N-uptake (upto 58.6%) over uninoculated control”
Claim · model-written summary
Pseudomonas inoculation increased wheat grain yield by up to 20.4% over uninoculated control.
- Taxon
- WheatTriticum aestivume0
- Treatment
- inoculation with Pseudomonase2
- Interactor
- Pseudomonas
Pseudomonase2symbiont - Outcome
- graine2
- Direction
- promotede2
- Value
- 20.4e2
- Comparator
- uninoculated controle2
- Setting
- fielde0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Wheat seeds inoculated with two isolates each of Azotobacter and Pseudomonas were sown in the field receiving fertilizer input of NPK @ 120-75-50 kg ha-1”
e2“inoculation with Pseudomonas promoted grain and straw yield, plant height, number of tillers, spikelets and total N-uptake upto 20.4, 14.2, 4.3, 16.8, 4.2 and 65.5%, respectively over uninoculated control”
Claim · model-written summary
Pseudomonas inoculation increased wheat straw yield by up to 14.2% over uninoculated control.
- Taxon
- WheatTriticum aestivume0
- Treatment
- inoculation with Pseudomonase2
- Interactor
- PseudomonasPseudomonase2symbiont
- Outcome
- straw yielde2
- Direction
- promotede2
- Value
- 14.2e2
- Comparator
- uninoculated controle2
- Setting
- fielde0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Wheat seeds inoculated with two isolates each of Azotobacter and Pseudomonas were sown in the field receiving fertilizer input of NPK @ 120-75-50 kg ha-1”
e2“inoculation with Pseudomonas promoted grain and straw yield, plant height, number of tillers, spikelets and total N-uptake upto 20.4, 14.2, 4.3, 16.8, 4.2 and 65.5%, respectively over uninoculated control”
Claim · model-written summary
Pseudomonas inoculation increased wheat plant height by up to 4.3% over uninoculated control.
- Taxon
- WheatTriticum aestivume0
- Treatment
- inoculation with Pseudomonase2
- Interactor
- PseudomonasPseudomonase2symbiont
- Outcome
- plant heighte2
- Direction
- promotede2
- Value
- 4.3e2
- Comparator
- uninoculated controle2
- Setting
- fielde0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Wheat seeds inoculated with two isolates each of Azotobacter and Pseudomonas were sown in the field receiving fertilizer input of NPK @ 120-75-50 kg ha-1”
e2“inoculation with Pseudomonas promoted grain and straw yield, plant height, number of tillers, spikelets and total N-uptake upto 20.4, 14.2, 4.3, 16.8, 4.2 and 65.5%, respectively over uninoculated control”
Claim · model-written summary
Pseudomonas inoculation increased the number of wheat tillers by up to 16.8% over uninoculated control.
- Taxon
- WheatTriticum aestivume0
- Treatment
- inoculation with Pseudomonase2
- Interactor
- PseudomonasPseudomonase2symbiont
- Outcome
- number of tillerse2
- Direction
- promotede2
- Value
- 16.8e2
- Comparator
- uninoculated controle2
- Setting
- fielde0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Wheat seeds inoculated with two isolates each of Azotobacter and Pseudomonas were sown in the field receiving fertilizer input of NPK @ 120-75-50 kg ha-1”
e2“inoculation with Pseudomonas promoted grain and straw yield, plant height, number of tillers, spikelets and total N-uptake upto 20.4, 14.2, 4.3, 16.8, 4.2 and 65.5%, respectively over uninoculated control”
Claim · model-written summary
Pseudomonas inoculation increased the number of wheat spikelets by up to 4.2% over uninoculated control.
- Taxon
- WheatTriticum aestivume0
- Treatment
- inoculation with Pseudomonase2
- Interactor
- PseudomonasPseudomonase2symbiont
- Outcome
- spikeletse2
- Direction
- promotede2
- Value
- 4.2e2
- Comparator
- uninoculated controle2
- Setting
- fielde0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Wheat seeds inoculated with two isolates each of Azotobacter and Pseudomonas were sown in the field receiving fertilizer input of NPK @ 120-75-50 kg ha-1”
e2“inoculation with Pseudomonas promoted grain and straw yield, plant height, number of tillers, spikelets and total N-uptake upto 20.4, 14.2, 4.3, 16.8, 4.2 and 65.5%, respectively over uninoculated control”
Claim · model-written summary
Pseudomonas inoculation increased total N-uptake of wheat by up to 65.5% over uninoculated control.
- Taxon
- WheatTriticum aestivume0
- Treatment
- inoculation with Pseudomonase2
- Interactor
- PseudomonasPseudomonase2symbiont
- Outcome
- total N-uptakee2
- Direction
- promotede2
- Value
- 65.5%e2
- Comparator
- uninoculated controle2
- Setting
- fielde0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Wheat seeds inoculated with two isolates each of Azotobacter and Pseudomonas were sown in the field receiving fertilizer input of NPK @ 120-75-50 kg ha-1”
e2“inoculation with Pseudomonas promoted grain and straw yield, plant height, number of tillers, spikelets and total N-uptake upto 20.4, 14.2, 4.3, 16.8, 4.2 and 65.5%, respectively over uninoculated control”
Claim · model-written summary
Inoculation treatments did not significantly change wheat spike length or 1000-grain weight relative to sterilized inocula.
- Taxon
- WheatTriticum aestivume0
- Treatment
- inoculation treatmentse4
- Outcome
- spike length and 1000-grain weighte4
- Direction
- no_changeinferrede4
- Comparator
- sterilized inoculae3
- Setting
- fielde0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Wheat seeds inoculated with two isolates each of Azotobacter and Pseudomonas were sown in the field receiving fertilizer input of NPK @ 120-75-50 kg ha-1”
e3“Control was treated with sterilized inocula”
e4“The effects of inoculation treatments on spike length and 1000-grain weight were non-significant”
The same questions in other papers
Pseudomonas · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results differ
22 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction
- no effect
- positive
- positive
20 papers more in this group
See all 24 papers →Azotobacter · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results differ
86 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction
- positive
- negative
- positive
84 papers more in this group
See all 88 papers →Azotobacter · nutrient: content · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results
12 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction
- positive
- no effect
- positive
10 papers more in this group
See all 14 papers →Pseudomonas · growth · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results
24 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction
- no effect
- no effect
- positive
23 papers more in this group
See all 27 papers →Pseudomonas · nutrient: content · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results agree
10 papers in the same direction as this paper
- positive
- positive
- positive
7 papers more in this group
See all 11 papers →Azotobacter · growth · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results agree
28 papers in the same direction as this paper
- positive
- positive
- positive
25 papers more in this group
See all 29 papers →inoculation · nutrient: content · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results
262 papers in the same direction as this paper · 13 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative
- no effect
- no effect
- negative
273 papers more in this group
See all 277 papers →inoculation · growth · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results
475 papers in the same direction as this paper · 55 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative
- no effect
- no effect
- no effect
528 papers more in this group
See all 532 papers →8 of 9 groups shown: named compounds and organisms first, then groups whose results differ (checked claim by claim), then those with positive and negative results, then the smaller groups.
Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.