Paper · 2012

Effects of Microbial Siderophores Produced by Native Azotobacter chroococcum Strains on Micronutrients Uptake by Wheat Plant

Leila Rahimi; Nasser Aliasgharzad; Shahin Oustan; et al.

4
claims
11
verbatim quotes
0
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

In this study, 14 strains of A. chroococcum isolated from wheat grown fields around the city of Tabriz, in northwest of Iran, were assayed for siderophore production using chrome azurol-S agar (CAS-agar) method under in-vitro conditions. Results showed that some strains had relatively higher ability in siderophore production. In a pot culture experiment with sterile soil, wheat plants (Triticum aestivum L.CV. Falat ) were inoculated with 14 bacterial strains. Positive control received nitrogen fertilizer without bacterial inoculation and negative control was left un-inoculated and without N- fertilizer. Totally, 16 treatments with four replications were arranged in completely randomized design. Concentartions and contents of Fe, Cu, Zn and Mn in shoot and root as well as translocations of these elements from root to the shoot were determined at the harvest time. Results showed that the inoculation with Azotobacter had significant effects on concentrations and contents of Fe, Zn and Cu in shoot and root. Translocations of Fe, Zn and Cu from root to the shoot were markedly increased in bacterial treatments compared to the positive and negative controls. Mn concentration and content as well as its translocation from root to the shoot were not significantly affected. In-vitro assessment of siderophore production revealed that the higher siderophore production in bacterial stains was in accordance with higher Fe in plant tissue and its translocation as well.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 4

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Azotobacter inoculation significantly affected iron, zinc and copper concentrations and contents in wheat shoots and roots.

Taxon
Triticum aestivumTriticum aestivume1
Treatment
inoculation with Azotobactere0
Interactor
AzotobacterAzotobactere0symbiont
Outcome
concentrations and contents of Fe, Zn and Cu in shoot and roote0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Azotobacter
Azotobacter · Interactor · picture of the genus (one of its species)DAN H. JONES · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the inoculation with Azotobacter had significant effects on concentrations and contents of Fe, Zn and Cu in shoot and root”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 895–1017 · show in text ↑
e1

“wheat plants (Triticum aestivum L.CV. Falat ) were inoculated with 14 bacterial strains”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 375–462 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Bacterial inoculation markedly increased iron, zinc and copper translocation from wheat roots to shoots relative to both controls.

Taxon
Triticum aestivumTriticum aestivume1
Treatment
bacterial treatmentse0
Interactor
AzotobacterAzotobactere2symbiont
Outcome
Translocations of Fe, Zn and Cu from root to the shoote0
Direction
markedly increasede0
Comparator
positive and negative controlse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Azotobacter
Azotobacter · Interactor · picture of the genus (one of its species)DAN H. JONES · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Translocations of Fe, Zn and Cu from root to the shoot were markedly increased in bacterial treatments compared to the positive and negative controls.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1019–1169 · show in text ↑
e1

“wheat plants (Triticum aestivum L.CV. Falat ) were inoculated with 14 bacterial strains”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 375–462 · show in text ↑
e2

“inoculation with Azotobacter”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 899–927 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Bacterial inoculation did not significantly affect manganese concentration, content or root-to-shoot translocation in wheat.

Taxon
Triticum aestivumTriticum aestivume1
Treatment
inoculation with Azotobactere2
Interactor
AzotobacterAzotobactere2symbiont
Outcome
Mn concentration and content as well as its translocation from root to the shoote0
Direction
not significantly affectede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Azotobacter
Azotobacter · Interactor · picture of the genus (one of its species)DAN H. JONES · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Mn concentration and content as well as its translocation from root to the shoot were not significantly affected.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1170–1283 · show in text ↑
e1

“wheat plants (Triticum aestivum L.CV. Falat ) were inoculated with 14 bacterial strains”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 375–462 · show in text ↑
e2

“inoculation with Azotobacter”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 899–927 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Higher bacterial siderophore production corresponded to higher iron in wheat tissue and greater iron translocation.

Taxon
Triticum aestivumTriticum aestivume1
Interactor
AzotobacterAzotobactere2symbiont
Outcome
Fe in plant tissue and its translocatione0
Direction
highere0
Qualifier
higher siderophore productione0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Azotobacter
Azotobacter · Interactor · picture of the genus (one of its species)DAN H. JONES · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the higher siderophore production in bacterial stains was in accordance with higher Fe in plant tissue and its translocation as well”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1344–1476 · show in text ↑
e1

“wheat plants (Triticum aestivum L.CV. Falat ) were inoculated with 14 bacterial strains”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 375–462 · show in text ↑
e2

“inoculation with Azotobacter”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 899–927 · show in text ↑

Azotobacter · nutrient: content · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

14 papers: 13 positive, 1 negative or no effect

13 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

10 papers more in this group

See all 14 papers →

inoculation · nutrient: content · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

277 papers: 263 positive, 14 negative or no effect

13 papers in the same direction as this paper · 263 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

273 papers more in this group

See all 277 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.