Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Bp 4317 increased Cochicó INTA yield by 13.6% in one year.

A claim from Response of field‐grown wheat to inoculation withAzospirillum brasilenseandbacillus polymyxain the semiarid region of Argentina · 1996

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Bp 4317 increased Cochicó INTA yield by 13.6% in one year.

Material
Cochicó INTAe0
Treatment
Inoculation of Cochicó INTA seeds with B. polymyxa Bp 4317e0
Interactor
B. polymyxaPaenibacillus polymyxae0symbiont
Outcome
yielde0
Direction
increasede0
Value
13.6%e0

Not reportedGeneCompoundOrgan / stageSecond interactorSecond interactor roleComparatorSettingQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Paenibacillus polymyxa
Paenibacillus polymyxa · InteractorDr. W.A. Clark · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Inoculation of Cochicó INTA seeds with B. polymyxa Bp 4317 increased yield by 13.6% and 19.5% in two different years”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 942–1058
t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 24–29

Title

Response of field‐grown wheat to inoculation withAzospirillum brasilenseandbacillus polymyxain the semiarid region of Argentina

E. A. Rodríguez Cáceres; G.González Anta; J. R. López; et al. Arid Soil Research and Rehabilitation 1996. doi:10.1080/15324989609381416

Other claims from this paper (14)

Record rev-32f7cd89c2579aebae952c3519a9e6768807c3f51e4171246891c5708c269563 · schema claims-v0.9 · position 11 in the model’s answer

Paenibacillus polymyxa · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results agree

3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this claim

  1. positive
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

inoculation · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

614 papers: 549 positive, 65 negative or no effect

548 papers in the same direction as this claim · 60 in the opposite direction · 5 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
  4. positive
  5. negative
  6. negative
  7. negative
  8. no effect

605 papers more in this group

See all 614 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.