Abstract
The growth and yield response of spring wheat to inoculation with foreign and local rhizobacteria of Erzurum (Turkey) origin was studied. At the first stage of the research, a greenhouse experiment was carried out with wheat cv. Kirik using 75 local bacterial strains isolated from the soil with 6 foreign bacteria, and a control. According to results of the greenhouse experiment 9 local strains were identified. At the second stage, the response of wheat cv. Kirik to 20 treatments (9 local strains, 6 foreign bacteria, 4 levels of N, and a control) was investigated in Erzurum field conditions. Seventeen strains had significant positive effects on tiller number per plant, 47 strains on plant height, one strain on dry matter yield, and 28 strains on plant protein content in the greenhouse experiment. Inoculation with certain rhizobacteria clearly benefited growth and increased the grain and N-yield of field grown wheat. The effects of local strains were observed to be in general superior to those of foreign strains. Inoculation with the local Strain No. 19, 73, and 82 increased total biomass by 18.7, 18.1, and 19.9%; grain yield by 18.6, 17.7, and 18.0%; total N-yield by 27.5, 24.3 and 26.0%, respectively, as compared to control. In conclusion, Strain No. 19, 73, and 82 can be a suitable biofertilizer for spring wheat cultivation in areas with similar conditions as in Erzurum. Inoculation with these strains may lead both to increases in wheat yield and savings of nitrogen fertilizer.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by-nc. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 16
Claim · model-written summary
47 strains had significant positive effects on plant height in the greenhouse.
- Taxon
- spring wheat
Triticum aestivumt0 - Outcome
- plant heighte0
- Value
- 47e0
Not reportedSetting
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“spring wheat (Triticum aestivum L.)”
e0“47 strains on plant height”
Claim · model-written summary
1 strains had significant positive effects on dry matter yield in the greenhouse.
- Taxon
- spring wheatTriticum aestivumt0
- Outcome
- dry matter yielde0
Not reportedSettingValue
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“spring wheat (Triticum aestivum L.)”
e0“one strain on dry matter yield”
Claim · model-written summary
28 strains had significant positive effects on plant protein content in the greenhouse.
- Taxon
- spring wheatTriticum aestivumt0
- Outcome
- plant protein contente0
- Value
- 28e0
Not reportedSetting
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“spring wheat (Triticum aestivum L.)”
e0“28 strains on plant protein content”
Claim · model-written summary
Rhizobacterial inoculation increased field wheat grain and nitrogen yield.
- Taxon
- spring wheatTriticum aestivumt0
- Treatment
- Inoculatione0
- Interactor
- rhizobacteriaHyphomicrobialese0symbiont
- Outcome
- grain and N-yielde0
- Direction
- increasede0
Not reportedMaterialComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“spring wheat (Triticum aestivum L.)”
e0“Inoculation with certain rhizobacteria clearly benefited growth and increased the grain and N-yield of field grown wheat”
Claim · model-written summary
Local strains generally outperformed foreign strains.
- Taxon
- spring wheatTriticum aestivumt0
- Outcome
- effects of local strainse0
- Direction
- superiore0
- Comparator
- foreign strainse0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“spring wheat (Triticum aestivum L.)”
e0“The effects of local strains were observed to be in general superior to those of foreign strains.”
Claim · model-written summary
Local Strain No. 19 increased total biomass by 18.7% compared with control.
- Taxon
- spring wheatTriticum aestivumt0
- Treatment
- Inoculation with the local Strain No. 19, 73, and 82e0
- Interactor
- Strain No. 19, 73, and 82e0symbiont
- Outcome
- total biomasse0
- Direction
- increasede0
- Value
- 18.7e0
- Comparator
- controle0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“spring wheat (Triticum aestivum L.)”
e0“Inoculation with the local Strain No. 19, 73, and 82 increased total biomass by 18.7, 18.1, and 19.9%; grain yield by 18.6, 17.7, and 18.0%; total N-yield by 27.5, 24.3 and 26.0%, respectively, as compared to control.”
Claim · model-written summary
Local Strain No. 19 increased grain yield by 18.6% compared with control.
- Taxon
- spring wheatTriticum aestivumt0
- Treatment
- Inoculation with the local Strain No. 19, 73, and 82e0
- Interactor
- Strain No. 19, 73, and 82e0symbiont
- Outcome
- grain yielde0
- Direction
- increasede0
- Value
- 18.6e0
- Comparator
- controle0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“spring wheat (Triticum aestivum L.)”
e0“Inoculation with the local Strain No. 19, 73, and 82 increased total biomass by 18.7, 18.1, and 19.9%; grain yield by 18.6, 17.7, and 18.0%; total N-yield by 27.5, 24.3 and 26.0%, respectively, as compared to control.”
Claim · model-written summary
Local Strain No. 19 increased total N-yield by 27.5% compared with control.
- Taxon
- spring wheatTriticum aestivumt0
- Treatment
- Inoculation with the local Strain No. 19, 73, and 82e0
- Interactor
- Strain No. 19, 73, and 82e0symbiont
- Outcome
- total N-yielde0
- Direction
- increasede0
- Value
- 27.5e0
- Comparator
- controle0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“spring wheat (Triticum aestivum L.)”
e0“Inoculation with the local Strain No. 19, 73, and 82 increased total biomass by 18.7, 18.1, and 19.9%; grain yield by 18.6, 17.7, and 18.0%; total N-yield by 27.5, 24.3 and 26.0%, respectively, as compared to control.”
Claim · model-written summary
Local Strain No. 73 increased total biomass by 18.1% compared with control.
- Taxon
- spring wheatTriticum aestivumt0
- Treatment
- Inoculation with the local Strain No. 19, 73, and 82e0
- Interactor
- Strain No. 19, 73, and 82e0symbiont
- Outcome
- total biomasse0
- Direction
- increasede0
- Value
- 18.1e0
- Comparator
- controle0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“spring wheat (Triticum aestivum L.)”
e0“Inoculation with the local Strain No. 19, 73, and 82 increased total biomass by 18.7, 18.1, and 19.9%; grain yield by 18.6, 17.7, and 18.0%; total N-yield by 27.5, 24.3 and 26.0%, respectively, as compared to control.”
Claim · model-written summary
Local Strain No. 73 increased grain yield by 17.7% compared with control.
- Taxon
- spring wheatTriticum aestivumt0
- Treatment
- Inoculation with the local Strain No. 19, 73, and 82e0
- Interactor
- Strain No. 19, 73, and 82e0symbiont
- Outcome
- grain yielde0
- Direction
- increasede0
- Value
- 17.7e0
- Comparator
- controle0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“spring wheat (Triticum aestivum L.)”
e0“Inoculation with the local Strain No. 19, 73, and 82 increased total biomass by 18.7, 18.1, and 19.9%; grain yield by 18.6, 17.7, and 18.0%; total N-yield by 27.5, 24.3 and 26.0%, respectively, as compared to control.”
Claim · model-written summary
Local Strain No. 73 increased total N-yield by 24.3% compared with control.
- Taxon
- spring wheatTriticum aestivumt0
- Treatment
- Inoculation with the local Strain No. 19, 73, and 82e0
- Interactor
- Strain No. 19, 73, and 82e0symbiont
- Outcome
- total N-yielde0
- Direction
- increasede0
- Value
- 24.3e0
- Comparator
- controle0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“spring wheat (Triticum aestivum L.)”
e0“Inoculation with the local Strain No. 19, 73, and 82 increased total biomass by 18.7, 18.1, and 19.9%; grain yield by 18.6, 17.7, and 18.0%; total N-yield by 27.5, 24.3 and 26.0%, respectively, as compared to control.”
Claim · model-written summary
Local Strain No. 82 increased total biomass by 19.9% compared with control.
- Taxon
- spring wheatTriticum aestivumt0
- Treatment
- Inoculation with the local Strain No. 19, 73, and 82e0
- Interactor
- Strain No. 19, 73, and 82e0symbiont
- Outcome
- total biomasse0
- Direction
- increasede0
- Value
- 19.9e0
- Comparator
- controle0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“spring wheat (Triticum aestivum L.)”
e0“Inoculation with the local Strain No. 19, 73, and 82 increased total biomass by 18.7, 18.1, and 19.9%; grain yield by 18.6, 17.7, and 18.0%; total N-yield by 27.5, 24.3 and 26.0%, respectively, as compared to control.”
Claim · model-written summary
Local Strain No. 82 increased grain yield by 18.0% compared with control.
- Taxon
- spring wheatTriticum aestivumt0
- Treatment
- Inoculation with the local Strain No. 19, 73, and 82e0
- Interactor
- Strain No. 19, 73, and 82e0symbiont
- Outcome
- grain yielde0
- Direction
- increasede0
- Value
- 18.0e0
- Comparator
- controle0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“spring wheat (Triticum aestivum L.)”
e0“Inoculation with the local Strain No. 19, 73, and 82 increased total biomass by 18.7, 18.1, and 19.9%; grain yield by 18.6, 17.7, and 18.0%; total N-yield by 27.5, 24.3 and 26.0%, respectively, as compared to control.”
Claim · model-written summary
Local Strain No. 82 increased total N-yield by 26.0% compared with control.
- Taxon
- spring wheatTriticum aestivumt0
- Treatment
- Inoculation with the local Strain No. 19, 73, and 82e0
- Interactor
- Strain No. 19, 73, and 82e0symbiont
- Outcome
- total N-yielde0
- Direction
- increasede0
- Value
- 26.0e0
- Comparator
- controle0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“spring wheat (Triticum aestivum L.)”
e0“Inoculation with the local Strain No. 19, 73, and 82 increased total biomass by 18.7, 18.1, and 19.9%; grain yield by 18.6, 17.7, and 18.0%; total N-yield by 27.5, 24.3 and 26.0%, respectively, as compared to control.”
Claim · model-written summary
The authors consider local strains 19, 73, and 82 suitable biofertilizers for spring wheat under Erzurum-like conditions.
- Taxon
- spring wheatTriticum aestivumt0
- Outcome
- suitable biofertilizere0
- Setting
- Erzurume0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“spring wheat (Triticum aestivum L.)”
e0“Strain No. 19, 73, and 82 can be a suitable biofertilizer for spring wheat cultivation in areas with similar conditions as in Erzurum.”
Claim · model-written summary
The authors suggest inoculating with these strains could increase wheat yield and save nitrogen fertilizer.
- Taxon
- wheatTriticum aestivume0
- Outcome
- increases in wheat yield and savings of nitrogen fertilizere0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“spring wheat (Triticum aestivum L.)”
e0“Inoculation with these strains may lead both to increases in wheat yield and savings of nitrogen fertilizer.”
The same questions in other papers
inoculation · Hyphomicrobiales · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results
7 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction
- no effect
- positive
- positive
5 papers more in this group
See all 9 papers →inoculation · nutrient: content · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results
262 papers in the same direction as this paper · 13 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative
- positive
- positive
- no effect
273 papers more in this group
See all 277 papers →inoculation · growth · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results
475 papers in the same direction as this paper · 55 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative
- positive
- positive
- no effect
528 papers more in this group
See all 532 papers →inoculation · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results
548 papers in the same direction as this paper · 60 in the opposite direction · 5 reporting no difference from an alternative
- positive
- positive
- positive
610 papers more in this group
See all 614 papers →Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.