Abstract
Cadmium (Cd) is a nonessential and toxic element because it inhibits the growth and development of plants and is dangerous for end consumer. It enters in the human food chain through food crops. Application of plant nutrients such as zinc (Zn) and gypsum is a viable and cheap strategy to minimize its accumulation in edible plant portions. Therefore, this investigation was conducted to determine the effectiveness of Zn and gypsum against Cd accumulation in wheat. The results showed that Cd toxicity considerably decreased the plant growth, physiological activities, and yield attributes and increased the Cd accumulation in root, shoot, and grain, while application of Zn and gypsum remarkably increased the growth and yield and decreased the Cd accumulation in plant parts in Cd-contaminated soil. The results also depicted that application of Zn showed better results as compared to gypsum. In conclusion, we can say that application of Zn and gypsum remarkably ameliorated the Cd toxicity and decreased its accumulation in wheat, grown in Cd-contaminated soil.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 5
Claim · model-written summary
Cadmium toxicity decreased wheat plant growth, physiological activities and yield attributes.
- Taxon
- Wheat
Triticum aestivumt0 - Treatment
- Cd toxicitye0
- Outcome
- plant growth, physiological activities, and yield attributese0
- Direction
- decreasede0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
t0“Wheat (Triticum aestivum L.)”
e0“Cd toxicity considerably decreased the plant growth, physiological activities, and yield attributes”
Claim · model-written summary
Cadmium toxicity increased Cd accumulation in wheat root, shoot and grain.
- Taxon
- Wheat
Triticum aestivumt0 - Treatment
- Cd toxicitye0
- Outcome
- Cd accumulation in root, shoot, and graine1
- Direction
- increasede1
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
t0“Wheat (Triticum aestivum L.)”
e0“Cd toxicity considerably decreased the plant growth, physiological activities, and yield attributes”
e1“increased the Cd accumulation in root, shoot, and grain”
Claim · model-written summary
Zinc and gypsum application increased wheat growth and yield in Cd-contaminated soil.
- Taxon
- Wheat
Triticum aestivumt0 - Treatment
- application of Zn and gypsume2
- Outcome
- growth and yielde2
- Direction
- increasede2
- Qualifier
- in Cd-contaminated soile2
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
t0“Wheat (Triticum aestivum L.)”
e2“application of Zn and gypsum remarkably increased the growth and yield and decreased the Cd accumulation in plant parts in Cd-contaminated soil”
Claim · model-written summary
Zinc and gypsum application decreased Cd accumulation in wheat plant parts in Cd-contaminated soil.
- Taxon
- Wheat
Triticum aestivumt0 - Treatment
- application of Zn and gypsume2
- Outcome
- Cd accumulation in plant partse2
- Direction
- decreasede2
- Qualifier
- in Cd-contaminated soile2
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
t0“Wheat (Triticum aestivum L.)”
e2“application of Zn and gypsum remarkably increased the growth and yield and decreased the Cd accumulation in plant parts in Cd-contaminated soil”
Claim · model-written summary
Zinc application gave better wheat results than gypsum application.
- Taxon
- Wheat
Triticum aestivumt0 - Treatment
- application of Zne3
- Outcome
- better resultse3
- Direction
- bettere3
- Comparator
- gypsume3
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
t0“Wheat (Triticum aestivum L.)”
e3“application of Zn showed better results as compared to gypsum”
The same questions in other papers
cadmium atom · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results differ
20 papers in the same direction as this paper · 5 in the opposite direction
- positive
- positive
- positive
22 papers more in this group
See all 26 papers →cadmium atom · nutrient: content · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results differ
34 papers in the same direction as this paper · 6 in the opposite direction
- positive
- positive
- positive
37 papers more in this group
See all 41 papers →zinc atom · nutrient: content · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results differ
346 papers in the same direction as this paper · 33 in the opposite direction
- positive
- positive
- positive
376 papers more in this group
See all 380 papers →zinc atom · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results differ
455 papers in the same direction as this paper · 49 in the opposite direction · 6 reporting no difference from an alternative
- positive
- no effect
- negative
507 papers more in this group
See all 511 papers →heavy metal · nutrient: content · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results
13 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction
- positive
- positive
- positive
13 papers more in this group
See all 17 papers →heavy metal · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results
16 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction
- positive
- positive
- positive
16 papers more in this group
See all 20 papers →lime · nutrient: content · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results
45 papers in the same direction as this paper · 9 in the opposite direction
- negative
- no effect
- negative
51 papers more in this group
See all 55 papers →lime · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results
139 papers in the same direction as this paper · 31 in the opposite direction · 2 reporting no difference from an alternative
- no effect
- negative
- no effect
169 papers more in this group
See all 173 papers →Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.