Paper · 2017 · Communications in Soil Science and Plant Analysis

Effectiveness of Zinc and Gypsum Application Against Cadmium Toxicity and Accumulation in Wheat (Triticum aestivum L.)

M. S. Abbas; M. Akmal; Saif Ullah; et al.

5
claims
11
verbatim quotes
50
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Cadmium (Cd) is a nonessential and toxic element because it inhibits the growth and development of plants and is dangerous for end consumer. It enters in the human food chain through food crops. Application of plant nutrients such as zinc (Zn) and gypsum is a viable and cheap strategy to minimize its accumulation in edible plant portions. Therefore, this investigation was conducted to determine the effectiveness of Zn and gypsum against Cd accumulation in wheat. The results showed that Cd toxicity considerably decreased the plant growth, physiological activities, and yield attributes and increased the Cd accumulation in root, shoot, and grain, while application of Zn and gypsum remarkably increased the growth and yield and decreased the Cd accumulation in plant parts in Cd-contaminated soil. The results also depicted that application of Zn showed better results as compared to gypsum. In conclusion, we can say that application of Zn and gypsum remarkably ameliorated the Cd toxicity and decreased its accumulation in wheat, grown in Cd-contaminated soil.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 5

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Cadmium toxicity decreased wheat plant growth, physiological activities and yield attributes.

Treatment
Cd toxicitye0
Outcome
plant growth, physiological activities, and yield attributese0
Direction
decreasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Wheat (Triticum aestivum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 90–118 · show in text ↑
e0

“Cd toxicity considerably decreased the plant growth, physiological activities, and yield attributes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 491–590 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Cadmium toxicity increased Cd accumulation in wheat root, shoot and grain.

Treatment
Cd toxicitye0
Outcome
Cd accumulation in root, shoot, and graine1
Direction
increasede1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Wheat (Triticum aestivum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 90–118 · show in text ↑
e0

“Cd toxicity considerably decreased the plant growth, physiological activities, and yield attributes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 491–590 · show in text ↑
e1

“increased the Cd accumulation in root, shoot, and grain”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 595–650 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Zinc and gypsum application increased wheat growth and yield in Cd-contaminated soil.

Treatment
application of Zn and gypsume2
Outcome
growth and yielde2
Direction
increasede2
Qualifier
in Cd-contaminated soile2

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Wheat (Triticum aestivum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 90–118 · show in text ↑
e2

“application of Zn and gypsum remarkably increased the growth and yield and decreased the Cd accumulation in plant parts in Cd-contaminated soil”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 658–801 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Zinc and gypsum application decreased Cd accumulation in wheat plant parts in Cd-contaminated soil.

Treatment
application of Zn and gypsume2
Outcome
Cd accumulation in plant partse2
Direction
decreasede2
Qualifier
in Cd-contaminated soile2

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Wheat (Triticum aestivum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 90–118 · show in text ↑
e2

“application of Zn and gypsum remarkably increased the growth and yield and decreased the Cd accumulation in plant parts in Cd-contaminated soil”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 658–801 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Zinc application gave better wheat results than gypsum application.

Treatment
application of Zne3
Outcome
better resultse3
Direction
bettere3
Comparator
gypsume3

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Wheat (Triticum aestivum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 90–118 · show in text ↑
e3

“application of Zn showed better results as compared to gypsum”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 834–895 · show in text ↑

cadmium atom · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results differ

26 papers: 5 positive, 21 negative or no effect

20 papers in the same direction as this paper · 5 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

22 papers more in this group

See all 26 papers →

cadmium atom · nutrient: content · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results differ

41 papers: 6 positive, 35 negative or no effect

34 papers in the same direction as this paper · 6 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

37 papers more in this group

See all 41 papers →

zinc atom · nutrient: content · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results differ

380 papers: 347 positive, 33 negative or no effect

346 papers in the same direction as this paper · 33 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

376 papers more in this group

See all 380 papers →

zinc atom · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results differ

511 papers: 456 positive, 55 negative or no effect

455 papers in the same direction as this paper · 49 in the opposite direction · 6 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. no effect
  3. negative

507 papers more in this group

See all 511 papers →

heavy metal · nutrient: content · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

17 papers: 3 positive, 14 negative or no effect

13 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

13 papers more in this group

See all 17 papers →

heavy metal · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

20 papers: 3 positive, 17 negative or no effect

16 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

16 papers more in this group

See all 20 papers →

lime · nutrient: content · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

55 papers: 46 positive, 9 negative or no effect

45 papers in the same direction as this paper · 9 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. negative

51 papers more in this group

See all 55 papers →

lime · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

173 papers: 140 positive, 33 negative or no effect

139 papers in the same direction as this paper · 31 in the opposite direction · 2 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. no effect

169 papers more in this group

See all 173 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.