Paper · 2017 · PLoS ONE

Arbuscular mycorrhizal strategy for zinc mycoremediation and diminished translocation to shoots and grains in wheat

Abdelghafar M. Abu-Elsaoud; Nivien A. Nafady; Ahmed M. Abdel-Azeem

10
claims
18
verbatim quotes
56
citations
3
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

Mycoremediation is an on-site remediation strategy, which employs fungi to degrade or sequester contaminants from the environment. The present work focused on the bioremediation of soils contaminated with zinc by the use of a native mycorrhizal fungi (AM) called Funneliformis geosporum (Nicol. & Gerd.) Walker & Schüßler. Experiments were performed using Triticum aestivum L. cv. Gemmeza-10 at different concentrations of Zn (50, 100, 200 mg kg-1) and inoculated with or without F. geosporum. The results showed that the dry weight of mycorrhizal wheat increased at Zn stressed plants as compared to the non-Zn-stressed control plants. The concentrations of Zn also had an inhibitory effect on the yield of dry root and shoot of non-mycorrhizal wheat. The photosynthetic pigment fractions were significantly affected by Zn treatments and mycorrhizal inoculation, where in all treatments, the content of the photosynthetic pigment fractions decreased as the Zn concentration increased in the soil. However, the level of minerals of shoots, roots, and grains was greatly influenced by Zn-treatment and by inoculation with F. geosporum. Treatment with Zn in the soil increased Cu and Zn concentrations in the root, shoot and grains, however, other minerals (P, S, K, Ca and Fe) concentration was decreased. Inoculation of wheat with AM fungi significantly reduced the accumulation of Zn and depressed its translocation in shoots and grains of wheat. In conclusion, inoculation with a native F. geosporum-improves yields of wheat under higher levels of Zn and is possible to be applied for the improvement of zinc contaminated soil.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 10

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Zinc inhibited non mycorrhizal wheat root dry yield.

Treatment
Zne0
Outcome
yield of dry roote0
Direction
inhibitorye0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The concentrations of Zn also had an inhibitory effect on the yield of dry root and shoot of non-mycorrhizal wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 637–751 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Zinc inhibited non mycorrhizal wheat shoot dry yield.

Treatment
Zne0
Outcome
shoote0
Direction
inhibitorye0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The concentrations of Zn also had an inhibitory effect on the yield of dry root and shoot of non-mycorrhizal wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 637–751 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Photosynthetic pigments decreased as soil zinc increased.

Treatment
Zne0
Outcome
content of the photosynthetic pigment fractionse0
Direction
decreasede0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“in all treatments, the content of the photosynthetic pigment fractions decreased as the Zn concentration increased in the soil”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 870–996 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 110–115 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Zinc treatment increased copper concentrations in roots, shoots and grains.

Organ / stage
root, shoot and grainse0
Treatment
Zne0
Outcome
Cue0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Treatment with Zn in the soil increased Cu and Zn concentrations in the root, shoot and grains”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1135–1229 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 110–115 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Zinc treatment increased zinc concentrations in roots, shoots and grains.

Organ / stage
root, shoot and grainse0
Treatment
Zne0
Outcome
Zn concentrationse0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Treatment with Zn in the soil increased Cu and Zn concentrations in the root, shoot and grains”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1135–1229 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 110–115 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Zinc treatment decreased P, S and K concentrations.

Treatment
Treatment with Zne0
Outcome
P, S, Ke0
Direction
decreasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Treatment with Zn in the soil increased Cu and Zn concentrations in the root, shoot and grains, however, other minerals (P, S, K, Ca and Fe) concentration was decreased”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1135–1303 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 110–115 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Zinc treatment decreased Ca and Fe concentrations.

Treatment
Treatment with Zne0
Outcome
Ca and Fee0
Direction
decreasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Treatment with Zn in the soil increased Cu and Zn concentrations in the root, shoot and grains, however, other minerals (P, S, K, Ca and Fe) concentration was decreased”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1135–1303 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 110–115 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Mycorrhizal inoculation reduced zinc accumulation in wheat.

Treatment
Inoculation of wheat with AM fungie0
Interactor
AM fungiGlomeromycotae0symbiontt0
Outcome
accumulation of Zne0
Direction
reducede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Inoculation of wheat with AM fungi significantly reduced the accumulation of Zn and depressed its translocation in shoots and grains of wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1305–1446 · show in text ↑
t0

“Funneliformis geosporum (Nicol. & Gerd.) Walker & Schüßler”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 263–321 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Mycorrhizal inoculation depressed zinc translocation to wheat shoots and grains.

Treatment
Inoculation of wheat with AM fungie0
Interactor
AM fungiGlomeromycotae0symbiontt0
Outcome
translocation in shoots and grainse0
Direction
depressede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Inoculation of wheat with AM fungi significantly reduced the accumulation of Zn and depressed its translocation in shoots and grains of wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1305–1446 · show in text ↑
t0

“Funneliformis geosporum (Nicol. & Gerd.) Walker & Schüßler”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 263–321 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors recommend native F. geosporum inoculation to improve wheat yield under high zinc.

Interactor
F. geosporumFunneliformis geosporume0symbiontt0
Outcome
improves yieldse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“inoculation with a native F. geosporum-improves yields of wheat under higher levels of Zn”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1463–1552 · show in text ↑
t0

“Funneliformis geosporum (Nicol. & Gerd.) Walker & Schüßler”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 263–321 · show in text ↑

zinc atom · growth · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results differ

200 papers: 155 positive, 45 negative or no effect

44 papers in the same direction as this paper · 155 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. positive

196 papers more in this group

See all 200 papers →

zinc atom · nutrient: content · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results differ

380 papers: 347 positive, 33 negative or no effect

32 papers in the same direction as this paper · 347 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

376 papers more in this group

See all 380 papers →

zinc atom · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results differ

511 papers: 456 positive, 55 negative or no effect

54 papers in the same direction as this paper · 456 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive

507 papers more in this group

See all 511 papers →

inoculation · Glomeromycota · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results agree

7 papers: 7 positive, 0 negative or no effect

6 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

3 papers more in this group

See all 7 papers →

mycorrhiza · Glomeromycota · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results agree

15 papers: 15 positive, 0 negative or no effect

14 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

11 papers more in this group

See all 15 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.