Intervention effectmodel-written summary

AM fungal inoculation increased root colonization in the three cereals.

A claim from Impact of Arbuscular-Mycorrhizal Fungi on Phosphorus Efficiency of Wheat, Rye, and Triticale · 2005

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

AM fungal inoculation increased root colonization in the three cereals.

Treatment
Inoculation with AM fungie0
Interactor
AM fungiGlomeromycotae0symbiont
Outcome
extent of root colonizatione0
Direction
increasee0
Value
70%e0
Comparator
without AMe0

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageSecond interactorSecond interactor roleSettingQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Inoculation with AM fungi showed a significant increase in extent of root colonization for all three cereals (average 70%) compared with their performance without AM (average 19.1%)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 551–732
t0

“Impact of Arbuscular-Mycorrhizal Fungi on Phosphorus Efficiency of Wheat, Rye, and Triticale”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–92

Title

Impact of Arbuscular-Mycorrhizal Fungi on Phosphorus Efficiency of Wheat, Rye, and Triticale

Renu Pandey; Bhupinder Singh; T. V. R. Nair Journal of Plant Nutrition 2005. doi:10.1080/01904160500251381

Record rev-bfcd502b708f4310b7e006d7c1da3f40dd43096e05cd24c0b39bcc6b3048ca7b · schema claims-v0.9 · position 1 in the model’s answer

inoculation · Glomeromycota · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results agree

7 papers: 7 positive, 0 negative or no effect

6 papers in the same direction as this claim

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
  4. positive
  5. positive
  6. positive
See all 7 papers →

mycorrhiza · Glomeromycota · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results agree

15 papers: 15 positive, 0 negative or no effect

14 papers in the same direction as this claim

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
  4. positive
  5. positive
  6. positive
  7. positive
  8. positive

6 papers more in this group

See all 15 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.