Abstract
A field experiment was conducted at CCSHAU, Hisar to determine the effect of seed priming, biofertilizer inoculations and nitrogen levels on late sown wheat. The experiment comprised of 5 seed priming treatments i.e. no seed priming, seed priming with water, seed priming with water + Azotobacter, seed priming with water + AM fungi, seed priming with water + Biomix in main plot and 4 nitrogen levels viz. 120, 135, 150 and 165 kg ha-1 in sub plot was carried out in split plot design with three replications. Seed priming with water along with either of biofertilizer inoculations i.e., Azotobacter, AM fungi and Biomix significantly improved grain yield, straw yield and yield attributes except 1000 - grain weight as compared to non primed-uninoculated treatment. However, harvest index was not significantly influenced by seed priming as well as inoculation treatments. The net returns (Rs.44041 ha-1 ha) and B:C ratio (2.07) were highest under the treatment water primed seeds inoculated with biomix closely followed by water primed seeds inoculated with AM fungi with returns of Rs. 43471 ha-1 and B:C of 2.06. Application of 150 kg N ha-1 significantly improved yield attributes except 1000 grain weight; yields and economic returns over both 120 and 135 kg N ha-1 levels, however, it was at par to 165 kg N ha-1 dose. Integrated use of 135 kg N ha-1and water primed seed inoculated with biomix gave yield and economic returns comparable to highest dose of 165kg N ha-1 alone.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 11
Claim · model-written summary
Water priming with Azotobacter significantly improved grain and straw yield and other yield attributes.
- Taxon
- wheat
Triticum aestivumt0 - Treatment
- Seed priming with water along with either of biofertilizer inoculationse0
- Interactor
- Azotobacter
Azotobactere0symbiont - Outcome
- grain yield, straw yield and yield attributese0
- Direction
- improvede0
- Comparator
- non primed-uninoculated treatmente0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Seed priming with water along with either of biofertilizer inoculations i.e., Azotobacter, AM fungi and Biomix significantly improved grain yield, straw yield and yield attributes except 1000 - grain weight as compared to non primed-uninoculated treatment.”
t0“wheat”
Claim · model-written summary
Water priming with AM fungi significantly improved grain and straw yield and other yield attributes.
- Taxon
- wheatTriticum aestivumt0
- Treatment
- Seed priming with water along with either of biofertilizer inoculationse0
- Interactor
- AM fungiGlomeromycotae0symbiont
- Outcome
- grain yield, straw yield and yield attributese0
- Direction
- improvede0
- Comparator
- non primed-uninoculated treatmente0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Seed priming with water along with either of biofertilizer inoculations i.e., Azotobacter, AM fungi and Biomix significantly improved grain yield, straw yield and yield attributes except 1000 - grain weight as compared to non primed-uninoculated treatment.”
t0“wheat”
Claim · model-written summary
Water priming with Biomix significantly improved grain and straw yield and other yield attributes.
- Taxon
- wheatTriticum aestivumt0
- Treatment
- Seed priming with water along with either of biofertilizer inoculationse0
- Interactor
- Biomixe0symbiont
- Outcome
- grain yield, straw yield and yield attributese0
- Direction
- improvede0
- Comparator
- non primed-uninoculated treatmente0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Seed priming with water along with either of biofertilizer inoculations i.e., Azotobacter, AM fungi and Biomix significantly improved grain yield, straw yield and yield attributes except 1000 - grain weight as compared to non primed-uninoculated treatment.”
t0“wheat”
Claim · model-written summary
Seed priming and inoculation did not significantly influence harvest index.
- Taxon
- wheatTriticum aestivumt0
- Treatment
- seed priming as well as inoculation treatmentse0
- Outcome
- harvest indexe0
Not reportedComparatorDirection
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“However, harvest index was not significantly influenced by seed priming as well as inoculation treatments.”
t0“wheat”
Claim · model-written summary
net returns was Rs.44041 ha-1 ha under water priming with biofertilizer.
- Taxon
- wheatTriticum aestivumt0
- Outcome
- net returnse0
- Direction
- higheste0
- Value
- Rs.44041 ha-1 hae0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“The net returns (Rs.44041 ha-1 ha) and B:C ratio (2.07) were highest under the treatment water primed seeds inoculated with biomix closely followed by water primed seeds inoculated with AM fungi with returns of Rs. 43471 ha-1 and B:C of 2.06.”
t0“wheat”
Claim · model-written summary
B:C ratio was 2.07 under water priming with biofertilizer.
- Taxon
- wheatTriticum aestivumt0
- Outcome
- B:C ratioe0
- Direction
- higheste0
- Value
- 2.07e0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“The net returns (Rs.44041 ha-1 ha) and B:C ratio (2.07) were highest under the treatment water primed seeds inoculated with biomix closely followed by water primed seeds inoculated with AM fungi with returns of Rs. 43471 ha-1 and B:C of 2.06.”
t0“wheat”
Claim · model-written summary
returns was Rs. 43471 ha-1 under water priming with biofertilizer.
- Taxon
- wheatTriticum aestivumt0
- Outcome
- returnse0
- Direction
- closely followede0
- Value
- Rs. 43471 ha-1e0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“The net returns (Rs.44041 ha-1 ha) and B:C ratio (2.07) were highest under the treatment water primed seeds inoculated with biomix closely followed by water primed seeds inoculated with AM fungi with returns of Rs. 43471 ha-1 and B:C of 2.06.”
t0“wheat”
Claim · model-written summary
B:C was 2.06 under water priming with biofertilizer.
- Taxon
- wheatTriticum aestivumt0
- Outcome
- B:Ce0
- Direction
- closely followede0
- Value
- 2.06e0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“The net returns (Rs.44041 ha-1 ha) and B:C ratio (2.07) were highest under the treatment water primed seeds inoculated with biomix closely followed by water primed seeds inoculated with AM fungi with returns of Rs. 43471 ha-1 and B:C of 2.06.”
t0“wheat”
Claim · model-written summary
150 kg N ha-1 significantly improved yield attributes, yields and economic returns over 120 and 135 kg N ha-1.
- Taxon
- wheatTriticum aestivumt0
- Treatment
- 150 kg N ha-1e0
- Outcome
- yield attributes except 1000 grain weight; yields and economic returnse0
- Direction
- improvede0
- Comparator
- 120 and 135 kg N ha-1 levelse0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Application of 150 kg N ha-1 significantly improved yield attributes except 1000 grain weight; yields and economic returns over both 120 and 135 kg N ha-1 levels, however, it was at par to 165 kg N ha-1 dose.”
t0“wheat”
Claim · model-written summary
The 150 kg N ha-1 response was at par with 165 kg N ha-1.
- Taxon
- wheatTriticum aestivumt0
- Treatment
- 150 kg N ha-1e0
- Outcome
- yields and economic returnse0
- Direction
- at pare0
- Comparator
- 165 kg N ha-1 dosee0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Application of 150 kg N ha-1 significantly improved yield attributes except 1000 grain weight; yields and economic returns over both 120 and 135 kg N ha-1 levels, however, it was at par to 165 kg N ha-1 dose.”
t0“wheat”
Claim · model-written summary
135 kg N ha-1 with water priming and Biomix gave yields and returns comparable to 165 kg N ha-1 alone.
- Taxon
- wheatTriticum aestivumt0
- Treatment
- 135 kg N ha-1and water primed seed inoculated with biomixe0
- Interactor
- biomixe0symbiont
- Outcome
- yield and economic returnse0
- Direction
- comparablee0
- Comparator
- 165kg N ha-1 alonee0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Integrated use of 135 kg N ha-1and water primed seed inoculated with biomix gave yield and economic returns comparable to highest dose of 165kg N ha-1 alone.”
t0“wheat”
The same questions in other papers
seed treatment · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results
269 papers in the same direction as this paper · 31 in the opposite direction
- positive
- no effect
- no effect
297 papers more in this group
See all 301 papers →inoculation · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results
548 papers in the same direction as this paper · 60 in the opposite direction · 5 reporting no difference from an alternative
- negative
- negative
- negative
610 papers more in this group
See all 614 papers →nitrogen · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results
1,736 papers in the same direction as this paper · 285 in the opposite direction · 39 reporting no difference from an alternative
- negative
- negative
- negative
2,057 papers more in this group
See all 2,061 papers →inoculation · Glomeromycota · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results agree
6 papers in the same direction as this paper
- positive
- positive
- positive
3 papers more in this group
See all 7 papers →inoculation · Azotobacter · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results agree
10 papers in the same direction as this paper
- positive
- positive
- positive
7 papers more in this group
See all 11 papers →Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.