Paper · 2020 · Renewable Agriculture and Food Systems

Landscape positions dictating crop fertilizer responses in wheat-based farming systems of East African Highlands

Tilahun Amede; Tadesse Gashaw; Gizachew Legesse; et al.

15
claims
29
verbatim quotes
58
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

Abstract Improving fertilizer use efficiency has remained a challenge, particularly for small-scale farming in undulating ‘abnormal’ landscapes of East Africa. Milne's 1930s concept on ‘Catena’ was considered as a breakthrough in understanding soil variability and its implication on productivity in East African highlands. However, there is limited information on how the ‘Catena’ features could be used for fine tuning fertilizer recommendations. We initiated multiple on-farm replicated experiments in three wheat-growing districts (Endamohoni, Lemo and Worreilu) in the Ethiopian highlands in 2014, 2015 and 2016 to assess landscape positions affecting crop-nutrient responses, identify yield limiting nutrients across the ‘Catena’ (N, P, K, S and Zn) and quantify effects of landscape positions on resources use efficiency. We clustered farmlands across the ‘Catena’ (Hillslopes, Midslopes and Footslopes) based on land scape positions in the respective locations. Wheat yield was more strongly and significantly affected by landscape positions ( P < 0.001) than by nutrient sources or rates. The crop response to fertilizers was 50 to 300% higher in foot slopes than in hillslopes, depending on locations and inputs levels. With increasing slope, there was a decrease in a crop fertilizer response due to a significant decrease in soil organic carbon, clay content and soil water content, with r 2 of 0.95, 0.86 and 0.96, respectively. The difference in the crop response between landscape positions was significantly higher ( P < 0.05) with higher rates of nutrient applications (>N92 P46) while differences between landscape positions diminish at lower rates. Yield benefits due to application of K was significant only in the dry years ( P < 0.05), while there was hardly any yield benefit from the application of zinc and sulfur. The crop nitrogen recovery fraction and crop water productivity decreased with an increasing slope regardless of nutrient combinations. The results indicated that the landscape position could be considered as a proxy indicator for targeted fertilizer application, particularly in farms with undulating topographic features. Hillslopes are better served by the application of organic fertilizers along with conservation measures as applying higher rates of mineral fertilizer in hillslopes would rather increase the risk of downstream nutrient movement.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 15

Associationobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Landscape position affected wheat yield more than nutrient sources or rates.

Outcome
yielde0
Direction
more stronglye0
Comparator
nutrient sources or ratese0
Setting
landscape positionse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Wheat yield was more strongly and significantly affected by landscape positions ( P < 0.001) than by nutrient sources or rates”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 970–1096 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Fertilizer response was 50 to 300% higher on footslopes than hillslopes.

Outcome
crop response to fertilizerse0
Direction
highere0
Value
50 to 300%e0
Comparator
hillslopese0
Setting
foot slopese0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“crop response to fertilizers was 50 to 300% higher in foot slopes than in hillslopes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1102–1186 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 59–64 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Crop fertilizer response decreased as slope increased.

Outcome
crop fertilizer responsee0
Direction
decreasee0
Setting
increasing slopee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“With increasing slope, there was a decrease in a crop fertilizer response”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1230–1303 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 59–64 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Soil organic carbon decreased with increasing slope.

Outcome
soil organic carbone0
Direction
decreasee0
Value
0.95e0
Setting
increasing slopee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“With increasing slope, there was a decrease in a crop fertilizer response due to a significant decrease in soil organic carbon, clay content and soil water content, with r 2 of 0.95, 0.86 and 0.96, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1230–1440 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 59–64 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Soil clay content decreased with increasing slope.

Outcome
clay contente0
Direction
decreasee0
Value
0.86e0
Setting
increasing slopee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“With increasing slope, there was a decrease in a crop fertilizer response due to a significant decrease in soil organic carbon, clay content and soil water content, with r 2 of 0.95, 0.86 and 0.96, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1230–1440 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 59–64 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Soil water content decreased with increasing slope.

Outcome
soil water contente0
Direction
decreasee0
Value
0.96e0
Setting
increasing slopee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“With increasing slope, there was a decrease in a crop fertilizer response due to a significant decrease in soil organic carbon, clay content and soil water content, with r 2 of 0.95, 0.86 and 0.96, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1230–1440 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 59–64 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Higher nutrient application rates increased differences between landscape positions.

Treatment
higher rates of nutrient applications (>N92 P46)e0
Outcome
difference in the crop response between landscape positionse0
Direction
highere0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“difference in the crop response between landscape positions was significantly higher ( P < 0.05) with higher rates of nutrient applications (>N92 P46)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1446–1596 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 59–64 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Differences between landscape positions diminished at lower nutrient rates.

Treatment
lower ratese0
Outcome
differences between landscape positionse0
Direction
diminishe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“differences between landscape positions diminish at lower rates”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1603–1666 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 59–64 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Potassium application increased yield only in dry years.

Treatment
application of Ke0
Outcome
Yield benefitse0
Direction
benefitse0
Qualifier
dry yearse0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Yield benefits due to application of K was significant only in the dry years ( P < 0.05)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1668–1756 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 59–64 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Zinc application yielded hardly any benefit.

Treatment
application of zince0
Outcome
yield benefite0
Direction
hardly anye0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“there was hardly any yield benefit from the application of zinc and sulfur”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1764–1838 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 59–64 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Sulfur application yielded hardly any benefit.

Treatment
application of zinc and sulfure0
Outcome
yield benefite0
Direction
hardly anye0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“there was hardly any yield benefit from the application of zinc and sulfur”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1764–1838 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 59–64 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Nitrogen recovery fraction decreased with increasing slope.

Outcome
crop nitrogen recovery fractione0
Direction
decreasede0
Setting
increasing slopee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“crop nitrogen recovery fraction and crop water productivity decreased with an increasing slope”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1844–1938 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 59–64 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Crop water productivity decreased with increasing slope.

Outcome
crop water productivitye0
Direction
decreasede0
Setting
increasing slopee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“crop nitrogen recovery fraction and crop water productivity decreased with an increasing slope”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1844–1938 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 59–64 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

Landscape position can guide targeted fertilizer application.

Outcome
targeted fertilizer applicatione0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“landscape position could be considered as a proxy indicator for targeted fertilizer application”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2007–2102 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 59–64 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors recommend organic fertilizers and conservation measures on hillslopes.

Outcome
application of organic fertilizers along with conservation measurese0
Setting
Hillslopese0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Hillslopes are better served by the application of organic fertilizers along with conservation measures”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2164–2267 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 59–64 · show in text ↑

sulfur atom · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results differ

148 papers: 124 positive, 24 negative or no effect

23 papers in the same direction as this paper · 124 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

144 papers more in this group

See all 148 papers →

zinc atom · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results differ

511 papers: 456 positive, 55 negative or no effect

54 papers in the same direction as this paper · 456 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

507 papers more in this group

See all 511 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.