Claim · model-written summary
S omission caused wheat grain yield penalties within the reported 0.54–9% range versus All-Blend.
- Taxon
- wheat
Triticum aestivumt0 - Treatment
- Se0
- Outcome
- grain yielde0
- Direction
- penaltiese0
- Value
- 0.54–9%e0
- Comparator
- All-Blende0
Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleSettingQualifier
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“The grain yield penalties due to K, S, Zn, and B omission were 0.54–9% over landscape positions and rainfall regimes compared to applying All-Blend”
t0“wheat”
Title
Getachew Agegnehu; Gizaw Desta; Tadele Amare; et al. Journal of Plant Nutrition 2025. doi:10.1080/01904167.2025.2490037
Other claims from this paper (10)
- Intervention effect Applying 150% of All-Blend gave the highest wheat yield across landscape positions and rainfall regimes.
- Intervention effect Under foot slope and high rainfall conditions, 150% All-Blend improved wheat grain yield by 109.5% (2.54 t ha−1) versus control.
- Intervention effect Under low rainfall, wheat yield improved by 72.5% with 150% All-Blend.
- Intervention effect Control wheat grain yield was 27–70% lower across landscape positions and rainfall regimes.
- Intervention effect K omission caused wheat grain yield penalties within the reported 0.54–9% range versus All-Blend.
- Intervention effect Zn omission caused wheat grain yield penalties within the reported 0.54–9% range versus All-Blend.
- Intervention effect B omission caused wheat grain yield penalties within the reported 0.54–9% range versus All-Blend.
- Observation The authors interpret K, S, Zn and B as not yield-limiting for wheat in the study areas.
- Recommendation The authors recommend considering landscape strata and rainfall regimes to optimize wheat NP rates.
- Recommendation Further study of nutrient application forms is recommended because the evidence is inadequate to conclude.