Claim · model-written summary
Fertilizer treatments did not significantly differ in shoot trace element concentration.
- Taxon
- WHEAT
Triticum aestivumt0 - Treatment
- fertilizerse0
- Outcome
- concentration of trace elements in the shoote0
- Direction
- not significantly differente0
Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleComparatorSettingValueQualifier
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Among the fertilizers the concentration of trace elements in the shoot was also not significantly different.”
t0“WHEAT”
Title
WHEAT RESPONSE TO NITROGEN SOURCE UNDER SALINE CONDITIONS
M. Irshad; T. Honna; A. E. Eneji; et al. Journal of Plant Nutrition 2002. doi:10.1081/pln-120015525
Other claims from this paper (13)
- Intervention effect Increasing salinity decreased shoot dry matter.
- Intervention effect Increasing salinity decreased root dry matter.
- Intervention effect N application increased growth at all salinity levels.
- Intervention effect Combined nitrogen sources yielded more total dry biomass than single sources.
- Intervention effect Shoot nutrient concentrations generally increased with salinity.
- Intervention effect Nitrate treatment gave higher cation concentration than other nitrogen forms.
- Intervention effect Ammonium nitrogen inhibited cation uptake relative to nitrate under salinity.
- Intervention effect Urea nitrogen inhibited cation uptake relative to nitrate under salinity.
- Observation Shoot phosphorus and chloride concentration followed a trend opposite cations.
- Mechanism N uptake appeared influenced by soil–plant cation–anion balance.
- Intervention effect All forms of N enhanced shoot N concentration in the stated rank order.
- Observation Salinity–fertilizer interactions on Fe, Mn and Zn were inconsistent.
- Recommendation Authors suggest mixed ammoniacal and nitrate N could favor growth in saline soils.