Paper · 2017 · International Journal of Current Microbiology and Applied Sciences

Successive Application Impact of Some Organic Amendments Combined with Acid Producing Bacteria on Soil Properties, NPK Availability and Uptake by Some Plants

Abo baker Abd Elmoniem Abo baker

3
claims
3
verbatim quotes
20
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by-nc-sa

Abstract

Three pot experiments were conducted during three successive seasons (winter 2010/2011, summer season 2011 and winter 2011/2012) in the screen house of Agricultural Experimental Farm of Department of Soils and Water, Faculty of Agricultural, South Valley University, Qena governorate, Egypt to investigate the effects of successive seasonal applications of two organic amendments (filter mud cake FYM and farmyard manure FYM) at a level of 10 ton/fed, in a combination with adding acid producing bacteria (APB) and molasses on sandy soil properties and NPK, availability, as well as growth and NPK uptakes of wheat and sorghum plants along three successive seasons. The results showed that, the successive additions of FMC and FYM to the soil combined with molasses and APB exhibited improvements in of soil chemical properties and fertility status which an increase in the soil nutrient (NPK) power supply of the soil occurred with the available N, P and K in the soil. Thus, increase in the plants dry matter yield as well as N, P and K uptakes of the wheat plants were fulfilled in the third season compared to those of the first season. More studies are needed to investigate the long term effect of successive additions of such organic treatments on soil properties and available nutrients as well as plant growth and nutrients uptake under field conditions.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by-nc-sa. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 3

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Combined successive amendments increased soil N, P, and K availability.

Treatment
successive additions of FMC and FYM to the soil combined with molasses and APBe0
Outcome
available N, P and K in the soile0
Direction
increasee0

Not reportedTaxonComparator

Verbatim

e0

“successive additions of FMC and FYM to the soil combined with molasses and APB exhibited improvements in of soil chemical properties and fertility status which an increase in the soil nutrient (NPK) power supply of the soil occurred with the available N, P and K in the soil”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 695–969 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Wheat dry matter yield was higher in the third season than the first season.

Treatment
third seasone0
Outcome
plants dry matter yielde0
Direction
increasee0
Comparator
first seasone0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“increase in the plants dry matter yield as well as N, P and K uptakes of the wheat plants were fulfilled in the third season compared to those of the first season”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 977–1139 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Wheat N, P, and K uptake was higher in the third season than the first season.

Treatment
third seasone0
Outcome
N, P and K uptakese0
Direction
increasee0
Comparator
first seasone0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“increase in the plants dry matter yield as well as N, P and K uptakes of the wheat plants were fulfilled in the third season compared to those of the first season”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 977–1139 · show in text ↑

climate site · nutrient: content · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

15 papers: 7 positive, 8 negative or no effect

6 papers in the same direction as this paper · 8 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

11 papers more in this group

See all 15 papers →

climate site · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

154 papers: 72 positive, 82 negative or no effect

71 papers in the same direction as this paper · 79 in the opposite direction · 3 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

150 papers more in this group

See all 154 papers →

inoculation · nutrient: content · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

277 papers: 263 positive, 14 negative or no effect

262 papers in the same direction as this paper · 13 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. negative

273 papers more in this group

See all 277 papers →

fertilization · nutrient: content · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

959 papers: 854 positive, 105 negative or no effect

853 papers in the same direction as this paper · 95 in the opposite direction · 10 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

955 papers more in this group

See all 959 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.