Paper · 2021 · Plants

Exploring the Impacts of Genotype-Management-Environment Interactions on Wheat Productivity, Water Use Efficiency, and Nitrogen Use Efficiency under Rainfed Conditions

Raheel Osman; Muhammad Naveed Tahir; Syed Tahir Ata-Ul-Karim; et al.

12
claims
23
verbatim quotes
35
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

Wheat production under rainfed conditions is restrained by water scarcity, elevated temperatures, and lower nutrient uptake due to possible drought. The complex genotype, management, and environment (G × M × E) interactions can obstruct the selection of suitable high yielding wheat cultivars and nitrogen (N) management practices prerequisite to ensure food security and environmental sustainability in arid regions. The agronomic traits, water use efficiency (WUE), and N use efficiencies were evaluated under favorable and unfavorable weather conditions to explore the impacts of G × M × E on wheat growth and productivity. The multi-N rate (0, 70, 140, 210, and 280 kg N ha−1) field experiment was conducted under two weather conditions (favorable and unfavorable) using three wheat cultivars (AUR-809, CHK-50, and FSD-2008) in the Pothowar region of Pakistan. The experiments were laid out in randomized complete block design (RCBD), with split plot arrangements having cultivars in the main plot and N levels in the subplot. The results revealed a significant decrease in aboveground biomass, grain yield, crop N-uptake, WUE, and N use efficiency (NUE) by 15%, 22%, 21%, 18%, and 8%, respectively in the unfavorable growing season (2014–2015) as compared to favorable growing season (2013–2014) as a consequence of less rainfall and heat stress during the vegetative and reproductive growth phases, respectively. FSD-2008 showed a significantly higher aboveground biomass, grain yield, crop N-uptake, WUE, and NUE as compared to other wheat cultivars in both years. Besides, N140 appeared as the most suitable dose for wheat cultivars during the favorable growing season. However, any further increase in N application rates beyond N140 showed a non-significant effect on yield and yield components. Conversely, the wheat yield increased significantly up to 74% from N0 to N70 during the unfavorable growing season, and there was no substantial difference between N70–N280. The findings provide opportunities for maximizing yield while avoiding excessive N loss by selecting suitable cultivars and N application rates for rainfed areas of Pothowar Plateau by using meteorological forecasting, amount of summer rainfall, and initial soil moisture content.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 12

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Aboveground biomass decreased by 15% in the unfavorable growing season compared with the favorable one.

Treatment
unfavorable growing seasone1
Outcome
aboveground biomasse1
Direction
decreasee1
Value
15%e1
Comparator
favorable growing seasone1
Setting
Pothowar region of Pakistane0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“using three wheat cultivars (AUR-809, CHK-50, and FSD-2008) in the Pothowar region of Pakistan”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 769–863 · show in text ↑
e1

“a significant decrease in aboveground biomass, grain yield, crop N-uptake, WUE, and N use efficiency (NUE) by 15%, 22%, 21%, 18%, and 8%, respectively in the unfavorable growing season (2014–2015) as compared to favorable growing season”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1052–1288 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Grain yield decreased by 22% in the unfavorable growing season compared with the favorable one.

Treatment
unfavorable growing seasone1
Outcome
grain yielde1
Direction
decreasee1
Value
22%e1
Comparator
favorable growing seasone1
Setting
Pothowar region of Pakistane0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“using three wheat cultivars (AUR-809, CHK-50, and FSD-2008) in the Pothowar region of Pakistan”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 769–863 · show in text ↑
e1

“a significant decrease in aboveground biomass, grain yield, crop N-uptake, WUE, and N use efficiency (NUE) by 15%, 22%, 21%, 18%, and 8%, respectively in the unfavorable growing season (2014–2015) as compared to favorable growing season”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1052–1288 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Crop N-uptake decreased by 21% in the unfavorable growing season compared with the favorable one.

Treatment
unfavorable growing seasone1
Outcome
crop N-uptakee1
Direction
decreasee1
Value
21%e1
Comparator
favorable growing seasone1
Setting
Pothowar region of Pakistane0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“using three wheat cultivars (AUR-809, CHK-50, and FSD-2008) in the Pothowar region of Pakistan”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 769–863 · show in text ↑
e1

“a significant decrease in aboveground biomass, grain yield, crop N-uptake, WUE, and N use efficiency (NUE) by 15%, 22%, 21%, 18%, and 8%, respectively in the unfavorable growing season (2014–2015) as compared to favorable growing season”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1052–1288 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

WUE decreased by 18% in the unfavorable growing season compared with the favorable one.

Treatment
unfavorable growing seasone1
Outcome
WUEe1
Direction
decreasee1
Value
18%e1
Comparator
favorable growing seasone1
Setting
Pothowar region of Pakistane0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“using three wheat cultivars (AUR-809, CHK-50, and FSD-2008) in the Pothowar region of Pakistan”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 769–863 · show in text ↑
e1

“a significant decrease in aboveground biomass, grain yield, crop N-uptake, WUE, and N use efficiency (NUE) by 15%, 22%, 21%, 18%, and 8%, respectively in the unfavorable growing season (2014–2015) as compared to favorable growing season”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1052–1288 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

N use efficiency decreased by 8% in the unfavorable growing season compared with the favorable one.

Treatment
unfavorable growing seasone1
Outcome
N use efficiency (NUE)e1
Direction
decreasee1
Value
8%e1
Comparator
favorable growing seasone1
Setting
Pothowar region of Pakistane0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“using three wheat cultivars (AUR-809, CHK-50, and FSD-2008) in the Pothowar region of Pakistan”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 769–863 · show in text ↑
e1

“a significant decrease in aboveground biomass, grain yield, crop N-uptake, WUE, and N use efficiency (NUE) by 15%, 22%, 21%, 18%, and 8%, respectively in the unfavorable growing season (2014–2015) as compared to favorable growing season”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1052–1288 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

FSD-2008 had higher aboveground biomass, grain yield and crop N-uptake than the other wheat cultivars in both years.

Material
FSD-2008e2
Outcome
aboveground biomass, grain yield, crop N-uptakee2
Direction
highere2
Comparator
other wheat cultivarse2
Setting
Pothowar region of Pakistane0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“using three wheat cultivars (AUR-809, CHK-50, and FSD-2008) in the Pothowar region of Pakistan”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 769–863 · show in text ↑
e2

“FSD-2008 showed a significantly higher aboveground biomass, grain yield, crop N-uptake, WUE, and NUE as compared to other wheat cultivars in both years”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1419–1570 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

FSD-2008 had higher WUE and NUE than the other wheat cultivars in both years.

Material
FSD-2008e2
Outcome
WUE, and NUEe2
Direction
highere2
Comparator
other wheat cultivarse2
Setting
Pothowar region of Pakistane0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“using three wheat cultivars (AUR-809, CHK-50, and FSD-2008) in the Pothowar region of Pakistan”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 769–863 · show in text ↑
e2

“FSD-2008 showed a significantly higher aboveground biomass, grain yield, crop N-uptake, WUE, and NUE as compared to other wheat cultivars in both years”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1419–1570 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

N140 is the most suitable nitrogen dose for wheat cultivars in the favorable growing season.

Treatment
N140e3
Outcome
most suitable dosee3

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e3

“N140 appeared as the most suitable dose for wheat cultivars during the favorable growing season”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1581–1676 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Further increases in N application beyond N140 had no significant effect on yield and yield components.

Treatment
further increase in N application rates beyond N140e4
Outcome
yield and yield componentse4
Direction
no_changeinferrede4
Comparator
N140e4
Setting
Pothowar region of Pakistane0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“using three wheat cultivars (AUR-809, CHK-50, and FSD-2008) in the Pothowar region of Pakistan”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 769–863 · show in text ↑
e4

“any further increase in N application rates beyond N140 showed a non-significant effect on yield and yield components”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1687–1804 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Wheat yield increased by up to 74% from N0 to N70 in the unfavorable growing season.

Treatment
N70e5
Outcome
wheat yielde5
Direction
increasede5
Value
74%e5
Comparator
N0e5
Setting
Pothowar region of Pakistane0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“using three wheat cultivars (AUR-809, CHK-50, and FSD-2008) in the Pothowar region of Pakistan”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 769–863 · show in text ↑
e5

“Conversely, the wheat yield increased significantly up to 74% from N0 to N70 during the unfavorable growing season, and there was no substantial difference between N70–N280”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1806–1978 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Wheat yield did not differ substantially between N70 and N280.

Treatment
N70–N280e5
Outcome
wheat yielde5
Direction
no_changeinferrede5
Comparator
N70e5
Setting
Pothowar region of Pakistane0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“using three wheat cultivars (AUR-809, CHK-50, and FSD-2008) in the Pothowar region of Pakistan”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 769–863 · show in text ↑
e5

“Conversely, the wheat yield increased significantly up to 74% from N0 to N70 during the unfavorable growing season, and there was no substantial difference between N70–N280”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1806–1978 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

Selecting suitable cultivars and N application rates may maximize yield while avoiding excessive N loss in rainfed areas.

Outcome
maximizing yield while avoiding excessive N loss by selecting suitable cultivars and N application ratese6
Qualifier
rainfed areas of Pothowar Plateaue6

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“using three wheat cultivars (AUR-809, CHK-50, and FSD-2008) in the Pothowar region of Pakistan”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 769–863 · show in text ↑
e6

“The findings provide opportunities for maximizing yield while avoiding excessive N loss by selecting suitable cultivars and N application rates for rainfed areas of Pothowar Plateau”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1980–2161 · show in text ↑

climate site · nutrient: efficiency · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect

1 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

climate site · physiology: water · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

8 papers: 4 positive, 4 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper · 4 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. positive

4 papers more in this group

See all 8 papers →

climate site · nutrient: content · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

15 papers: 7 positive, 8 negative or no effect

7 papers in the same direction as this paper · 7 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

11 papers more in this group

See all 15 papers →

climate site · growth · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

31 papers: 13 positive, 18 negative or no effect

17 papers in the same direction as this paper · 13 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

27 papers more in this group

See all 31 papers →

climate site · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

154 papers: 72 positive, 82 negative or no effect

81 papers in the same direction as this paper · 72 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. positive

150 papers more in this group

See all 154 papers →

nitrogen · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

2,061 papers: 1,737 positive, 324 negative or no effect

323 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1,737 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

2,057 papers more in this group

See all 2,061 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.