Paper · 2022 · Frontiers in Microbiology

Climate-smart agricultural practices influence the fungal communities and soil properties under major agri-food systems

Madhu Choudhary; Hanuman S. Jat; Mangi L. Jat; et al.

11
claims
20
verbatim quotes
13
citations
1
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

Fungal communities in agricultural soils are assumed to be affected by climate, weather, and anthropogenic activities, and magnitude of their effect depends on the agricultural activities. Therefore, a study was conducted to investigate the impact of the portfolio of management practices on fungal communities and soil physical-chemical properties. The study comprised different climate-smart agriculture (CSA)-based management scenarios (Sc) established on the principles of conservation agriculture (CA), namely, ScI is conventional tillage-based rice-wheat rotation, ScII is partial CA-based rice-wheat-mungbean, ScIII is partial CSA-based rice-wheat-mungbean, ScIV is partial CSA-based maize-wheat-mungbean, and ScV and ScVI are CSA-based scenarios and similar to ScIII and ScIV, respectively, except for fertigation method. All the scenarios were flood irrigated except the ScV and ScVI where water and nitrogen were given through subsurface drip irrigation. Soils of these scenarios were collected from 0 to 15 cm depth and analyzed by Illumina paired-end sequencing of Internal Transcribed Spacer regions (ITS1 and ITS2) for the study of fungal community composition. Analysis of 5 million processed sequences showed a higher Shannon diversity index of 1.47 times and a Simpson index of 1.12 times in maize-based CSA scenarios (ScIV and ScVI) compared with rice-based CSA scenarios (ScIII and ScV). Seven phyla were present in all the scenarios, where Ascomycota was the most abundant phyla and it was followed by Basidiomycota and Zygomycota. Ascomycota was found more abundant in rice-based CSA scenarios as compared to maize-based CSA scenarios. Soil organic carbon and nitrogen were found to be 1.62 and 1.25 times higher in CSA scenarios compared with other scenarios. Bulk density was found highest in farmers' practice (Sc1); however, mean weight diameter and water-stable aggregates were found lowest in ScI. Soil physical, chemical, and biological properties were found better under CSA-based practices, which also increased the wheat grain yield by 12.5% and system yield by 18.8%. These results indicate that bundling/layering of smart agricultural practices over farmers' practices has tremendous effects on soil properties, and hence play an important role in sustaining soil quality/health.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 11

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Maize based scenarios had 1.47 times higher soil fungal Shannon diversity than rice based scenarios.

Taxon
maizeZea mayse1
Treatment
maize-based CSA scenarios (ScIV and ScVI)e0
Outcome
Shannon diversity indexe0
Direction
highere0
Value
1.47 timese0
Comparator
rice-based CSA scenarios (ScIII and ScV)e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“higher Shannon diversity index of 1.47 times and a Simpson index of 1.12 times in maize-based CSA scenarios (ScIV and ScVI) compared with rice-based CSA scenarios (ScIII and ScV)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1227–1405 · show in text ↑
e1

“maize-wheat-mungbean”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 691–711 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Maize based scenarios had 1.12 times higher soil fungal Simpson diversity than rice based scenarios.

Taxon
maizeZea mayse1
Treatment
maize-based CSA scenarios (ScIV and ScVI)e0
Outcome
Simpson indexe0
Direction
highere0
Value
1.12 timese0
Comparator
rice-based CSA scenarios (ScIII and ScV)e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“higher Shannon diversity index of 1.47 times and a Simpson index of 1.12 times in maize-based CSA scenarios (ScIV and ScVI) compared with rice-based CSA scenarios (ScIII and ScV)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1227–1405 · show in text ↑
e1

“maize-wheat-mungbean”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 691–711 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Ascomycota was the most abundant soil fungal phylum across scenarios.

Outcome
most abundant phylae0
Qualifier
Ascomycotae0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Ascomycota was the most abundant phyla and it was followed by Basidiomycota and Zygomycota”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1460–1550 · show in text ↑
e1

“rice-wheat rotation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 550–569 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Ascomycota was more abundant in rice based than maize based CSA scenarios.

Treatment
rice-based CSA scenariose0
Outcome
Ascomycotae0
Direction
more abundante0
Comparator
maize-based CSA scenariose0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Ascomycota was found more abundant in rice-based CSA scenarios as compared to maize-based CSA scenarios.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1552–1656 · show in text ↑
e1

“ScIII is partial CSA-based rice-wheat-mungbean”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 617–663 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Soil organic carbon was 1.62 times higher in CSA than other scenarios.

Treatment
CSA scenariose0
Outcome
Soil organic carbone0
Direction
highere0
Value
1.62e0
Comparator
other scenariose0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Soil organic carbon and nitrogen were found to be 1.62 and 1.25 times higher in CSA scenarios compared with other scenarios.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1657–1781 · show in text ↑
e1

“ScIII is partial CSA-based rice-wheat-mungbean”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 617–663 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Soil nitrogen was 1.25 times higher in CSA than other scenarios.

Treatment
CSA scenariose0
Outcome
nitrogene0
Direction
highere0
Value
1.25 timese0
Comparator
other scenariose0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Soil organic carbon and nitrogen were found to be 1.62 and 1.25 times higher in CSA scenarios compared with other scenarios.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1657–1781 · show in text ↑
e1

“ScIII is partial CSA-based rice-wheat-mungbean”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 617–663 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Soil bulk density was highest in the farmer practice scenario.

Treatment
farmers' practice (Sc1)e0
Outcome
Bulk densitye0
Direction
higheste0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Bulk density was found highest in farmers' practice (Sc1)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1782–1839 · show in text ↑
e1

“rice-wheat rotation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 550–569 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Mean weight diameter was lowest in scenario ScI.

Treatment
ScIe0
Outcome
mean weight diametere0
Direction
loweste0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“mean weight diameter and water-stable aggregates were found lowest in ScI”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1850–1923 · show in text ↑
e1

“rice-wheat rotation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 550–569 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Water stable aggregates were lowest in scenario ScI.

Treatment
ScIe0
Outcome
water-stable aggregatese0
Direction
loweste0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“mean weight diameter and water-stable aggregates were found lowest in ScI”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1850–1923 · show in text ↑
e1

“rice-wheat rotation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 550–569 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

CSA practices increased wheat grain yield by 12.5%.

Treatment
CSA-based practicese0
Outcome
wheat grain yielde0
Direction
increasede0
Value
12.5%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Soil physical, chemical, and biological properties were found better under CSA-based practices, which also increased the wheat grain yield by 12.5% and system yield by 18.8%.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1925–2099 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

CSA practices increased system yield by 18.8%.

Treatment
CSA-based practicese0
Outcome
system yielde0
Direction
increasede0
Value
18.8%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Soil physical, chemical, and biological properties were found better under CSA-based practices, which also increased the wheat grain yield by 12.5% and system yield by 18.8%.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1925–2099 · show in text ↑

climate site · nutrient: content · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

15 papers: 7 positive, 8 negative or no effect

6 papers in the same direction as this paper · 8 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

11 papers more in this group

See all 15 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.