Paper · 2024 · European Journal of Soil Science

Release, availability and geochemical interaction of Fe in soil after long‐term integrated nutrient management in wheat

Diksha Saroha; Narender Yadav; Dev Raj; et al.

6
claims
11
verbatim quotes
5
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Abstract Wheat contributes to about one‐fifth of the total calories and protein consumption by humans but is found lower in total iron (Fe) concentration than the targeted nutritional requirement, leading to increasing cases of anaemia and malnutrition in humans, especially in the developing countries. Therefore, it is the need of the hour to understand the dynamics of Fe in soil and its supply in relation to wheat productivity and grain quality. The objectives of this study were to examine the impact of long‐term (54 years) annual and biannual application of different doses of farmyard manure (FYM) (0, 5, 10 and 15 Mg ha −1 ) and nitrogen (0, 60 and 120 kg ha −1 ) under integrated nutrient management on the dynamics of Fe in soil along with its relationship with total Fe uptake in wheat. Additionally, the release pattern of native soil Fe and risk of Fe toxicity were evaluated. The highest grain yield of wheat (6.08 Mg ha −1 ) was observed under biannual application of FYM and nitrogen at 10 Mg ha −1 and 120 kg ha −1 , respectively, which was approximately 155% higher than the control plot (F 0 N 0 ). Under the dual season application of 15 Mg ha −1 FYM and 120 kg ha −1 nitrogen, the total Fe content (48.48 mg kg −1 ) and its uptake (270.52 g ha −1 ) in wheat grains were found at maximum. The soil incubation study revealed that the rate of release of Fe increased up to 30 days of incubation followed by constant rates indicating the establishment of dynamic equilibrium among the different Fe fractions. Thus, the present study was conducted for the first time to improve the understanding of changes in Fe concentration and rate of release in soil, which directly influence the Fe uptake in wheat grain under the long‐term integrated nutrient management practices.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 6

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The highest wheat grain yield (6.08 Mg ha −1) was observed under biannual application of FYM and nitrogen.

Treatment
biannual application of FYM and nitrogen at 10 Mg ha −1 and 120 kg ha −1e1
Outcome
grain yielde1
Direction
higheste1
Value
6.08 Mg ha −1e1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“The highest grain yield of wheat (6.08 Mg ha −1 ) was observed under biannual application of FYM and nitrogen at 10 Mg ha −1 and 120 kg ha −1”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 892–1033 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Grain yield under biannual FYM and nitrogen application was about 155% higher than the control plot.

Treatment
biannual application of FYM and nitrogen at 10 Mg ha −1 and 120 kg ha −1e1
Outcome
grain yielde1
Direction
highere2
Value
155%e2
Comparator
control plote2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“The highest grain yield of wheat (6.08 Mg ha −1 ) was observed under biannual application of FYM and nitrogen at 10 Mg ha −1 and 120 kg ha −1”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 892–1033 · show in text ↑
e2

“which was approximately 155% higher than the control plot (F 0 N 0 )”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1050–1118 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Total Fe content in wheat grains was at maximum (48.48 mg kg −1) under the dual season application of 15 Mg ha −1 FYM and 120 kg ha −1 nitrogen.

Organ / stage
wheat grainse4
Treatment
dual season application of 15 Mg ha −1 FYM and 120 kg ha −1 nitrogene4
Outcome
total Fe contente4
Direction
maximume4
Value
48.48 mg kg −1e4

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“integrated nutrient management in wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 80–119 · show in text ↑
e4

“Under the dual season application of 15 Mg ha −1 FYM and 120 kg ha −1 nitrogen, the total Fe content (48.48 mg kg −1 ) and its uptake (270.52 g ha −1 ) in wheat grains were found at maximum”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1120–1309 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Uptake of Fe in wheat grains was at maximum (270.52 g ha −1) under the dual season application of 15 Mg ha −1 FYM and 120 kg ha −1 nitrogen.

Organ / stage
wheat grainse4
Treatment
dual season application of 15 Mg ha −1 FYM and 120 kg ha −1 nitrogene4
Outcome
its uptakee4
Direction
maximume4
Value
270.52 g ha −1e4

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“integrated nutrient management in wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 80–119 · show in text ↑
e4

“Under the dual season application of 15 Mg ha −1 FYM and 120 kg ha −1 nitrogen, the total Fe content (48.48 mg kg −1 ) and its uptake (270.52 g ha −1 ) in wheat grains were found at maximum”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1120–1309 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The rate of release of soil Fe increased up to 30 days of incubation and then stayed constant.

Outcome
rate of release of Fee5
Direction
increasede5
Qualifier
up to 30 days of incubatione5

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“integrated nutrient management in wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 80–119 · show in text ↑
e5

“the rate of release of Fe increased up to 30 days of incubation followed by constant rates”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1351–1441 · show in text ↑
Observationauthor interpretationoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The soil Fe release indicated the establishment of dynamic equilibrium among the different Fe fractions.

Outcome
dynamic equilibrium among the different Fe fractionse6

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“integrated nutrient management in wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 80–119 · show in text ↑
e6

“indicating the establishment of dynamic equilibrium among the different Fe fractions”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1442–1526 · show in text ↑

climate site · nutrient: content · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

15 papers: 7 positive, 8 negative or no effect

6 papers in the same direction as this paper · 8 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

11 papers more in this group

See all 15 papers →

nitrogen · nutrient: content · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

479 papers: 410 positive, 69 negative or no effect

409 papers in the same direction as this paper · 64 in the opposite direction · 5 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. no effect

475 papers more in this group

See all 479 papers →

fertilization · nutrient: content · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

959 papers: 854 positive, 105 negative or no effect

853 papers in the same direction as this paper · 95 in the opposite direction · 10 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

955 papers more in this group

See all 959 papers →

nitrogen · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

2,061 papers: 1,737 positive, 324 negative or no effect

1,736 papers in the same direction as this paper · 285 in the opposite direction · 39 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

2,057 papers more in this group

See all 2,061 papers →

fertilization · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

3,438 papers: 3,115 positive, 323 negative or no effect

3,114 papers in the same direction as this paper · 284 in the opposite direction · 39 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. negative

3,434 papers more in this group

See all 3,438 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.