Paper · 2002 · Indian Journal of Agronomy

Effect of atrazine, metribuzin, sulfosulfuron and tralkoxydim on weeds and yield of wheat (Triticum aestivum)

Jitendra Pandey; Arvind Verma

14
claims
28
verbatim quotes
7
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

An experiment was conducted during the winter seasons of 1997–98 and 1998–99 to find out the effect of 4 herbicides on weeds and yield of wheat (Triticum aestivum L. emend. Fiori & Paol.) Of the herbicides, metribuzin being most potent killer of weeds, eliminated Chenopodium album L. and gave excellent control of all other weeds. Only this herbicide paralysed severely the growth of Convolvulus arvensis L. till harvest of the crop. The next best treatment was atrazine. Its effect on C. album was similar to that of metribuzin. It gave remarkable control of Phalaris minor Retz. but its effect on Avena ludoviciana was inconspicuous while vividly vivid on all other weed species. Isoproturon gave good control of P. minor and C. album and satisfactory control of all other weed species except C. arvensis. Sulfosulfuron proved more effective than tralkoxydim in controlling A. ludoviciana. Both the herbicides were effective against P. minor. Weed population and weed dry weight were significantly lower under weed-control treatments. The lowest was in metribuzin and it proved significantly superior to all other treatments in arresting both weed population and weed dry matter. The next best treatments were hand-weeding and atrazine. Weed competition resulted in significant decrease in wheat plant height, productive tillers/m row length, grains/panicle and 1,000 grain weight and lowered crop yield by 27.2%. All the weed control treatments caused significant increase in yield attributes and yield in both the years. Hand-weeding affected maximum increase in grain yield which proved significantly superior to all other treatments except metribuzin. (150 g/ha). No significant difference existed between atrazine (100 g/ha) and metribuzin.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 14

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Metribuzin was the most potent weed killer and eliminated Chenopodium album.

Treatment
metribuzine1
Interactor
Chenopodium albumChenopodium albume1weed
Outcome
killer of weedse1
Direction
most potente1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Chenopodium album
Chenopodium album · InteractorOlivier Pichard · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“effect of 4 herbicides on weeds and yield of wheat (Triticum aestivum L. emend. Fiori & Paol.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 93–187 · show in text ↑
e1

“metribuzin being most potent killer of weeds, eliminated Chenopodium album L.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 207–284 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Weed population and weed dry weight were significantly lower under weed-control treatments.

Treatment
weed-control treatmentse2
Interactor
weedse0weed
Outcome
Weed population and weed dry weighte2
Direction
lowere2

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“effect of 4 herbicides on weeds and yield of wheat (Triticum aestivum L. emend. Fiori & Paol.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 93–187 · show in text ↑
e2

“Weed population and weed dry weight were significantly lower under weed-control treatments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 946–1036 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Metribuzin gave the lowest weed population and weed dry matter, significantly superior to all other treatments.

Treatment
metribuzine3
Interactor
weedse0weed
Outcome
weed population and weed dry mattere3
Direction
loweste3
Comparator
all other treatmentse3

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“effect of 4 herbicides on weeds and yield of wheat (Triticum aestivum L. emend. Fiori & Paol.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 93–187 · show in text ↑
e3

“The lowest was in metribuzin and it proved significantly superior to all other treatments in arresting both weed population and weed dry matter”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1038–1181 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Weed competition lowered wheat crop yield by 27.2%.

Treatment
Weed competitione4
Interactor
weedse0weed
Outcome
crop yielde4
Direction
lowerede4
Value
27.2%e4

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“effect of 4 herbicides on weeds and yield of wheat (Triticum aestivum L. emend. Fiori & Paol.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 93–187 · show in text ↑
e4

“Weed competition resulted in significant decrease in wheat plant height, productive tillers/m row length, grains/panicle and 1,000 grain weight and lowered crop yield by 27.2%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1240–1415 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Weed competition significantly decreased wheat plant height, productive tillers and grains per panicle.

Treatment
Weed competitione4
Interactor
weedse0weed
Outcome
plant height, productive tillers/m row length, grains/paniclee4
Direction
decreasee4

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“effect of 4 herbicides on weeds and yield of wheat (Triticum aestivum L. emend. Fiori & Paol.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 93–187 · show in text ↑
e4

“Weed competition resulted in significant decrease in wheat plant height, productive tillers/m row length, grains/panicle and 1,000 grain weight and lowered crop yield by 27.2%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1240–1415 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Weed competition significantly decreased 1,000 grain weight of wheat.

Treatment
Weed competitione4
Interactor
weedse0weed
Outcome
1,000 grain weighte4
Direction
decreasee4

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“effect of 4 herbicides on weeds and yield of wheat (Triticum aestivum L. emend. Fiori & Paol.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 93–187 · show in text ↑
e4

“Weed competition resulted in significant decrease in wheat plant height, productive tillers/m row length, grains/panicle and 1,000 grain weight and lowered crop yield by 27.2%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1240–1415 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

All weed-control treatments significantly increased yield attributes and yield of wheat.

Treatment
weed control treatmentse5
Outcome
yield attributes and yielde5
Direction
increasee5

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“effect of 4 herbicides on weeds and yield of wheat (Triticum aestivum L. emend. Fiori & Paol.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 93–187 · show in text ↑
e5

“All the weed control treatments caused significant increase in yield attributes and yield in both the years”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1417–1524 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Hand-weeding gave the maximum increase in grain yield, significantly superior to all other treatments except metribuzin.

Treatment
Hand-weedinge6
Outcome
grain yielde6
Direction
maximum increasee6
Comparator
all other treatments except metribuzine6

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“effect of 4 herbicides on weeds and yield of wheat (Triticum aestivum L. emend. Fiori & Paol.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 93–187 · show in text ↑
e6

“Hand-weeding affected maximum increase in grain yield which proved significantly superior to all other treatments except metribuzin”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1526–1657 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Atrazine at 100 g/ha did not differ significantly from metribuzin.

Treatment
atrazine (100 g/ha)e7
Direction
No significant differencee7
Comparator
metribuzine7

Not reportedOutcome

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“effect of 4 herbicides on weeds and yield of wheat (Triticum aestivum L. emend. Fiori & Paol.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 93–187 · show in text ↑
e7

“No significant difference existed between atrazine (100 g/ha) and metribuzin”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1671–1747 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Sulfosulfuron was more effective than tralkoxydim in controlling Avena ludoviciana.

Treatment
Sulfosulfurone1
Interactor
A. ludovicianaAvena sterilis subsp. ludovicianae1weed
Outcome
controlling A. ludovicianae1
Direction
more effectivee1
Comparator
tralkoxydime1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Avena sterilis subsp. ludoviciana
Avena sterilis subsp. ludoviciana · InteractorMarie PORTAS · CC BY-SA 2.0 fr · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“effect of 4 herbicides on weeds and yield of wheat (Triticum aestivum L. emend. Fiori & Paol.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 93–187 · show in text ↑
e1

“Sulfosulfuron proved more effective than tralkoxydim in controlling A. ludoviciana”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 809–891 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Metribuzin severely paralysed the growth of Convolvulus arvensis.

Treatment
metribuzine1
Interactor
Convolvulus arvensis L.Convolvulus arvensise1weed
Outcome
growth of Convolvulus arvensis L.e1
Direction
paralysed severelye1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Convolvulus arvensis
Convolvulus arvensis · InteractorW. Bulach · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“effect of 4 herbicides on weeds and yield of wheat (Triticum aestivum L. emend. Fiori & Paol.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 93–187 · show in text ↑
e1

“metribuzin being most potent killer of weeds, eliminated Chenopodium album L. and gave excellent control of all other weeds. Only this herbicide paralysed severely the growth of Convolvulus arvensis L.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 207–408 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Atrazine gave remarkable control of Phalaris minor.

Treatment
atrazinee2
Interactor
Phalaris minor RetzPhalaris minore2weed
Outcome
controle2
Direction
remarkablee2

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Phalaris minor
Phalaris minor · Interactor · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryMatt Lavin from Bozeman, Montana, USA · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“effect of 4 herbicides on weeds and yield of wheat (Triticum aestivum L. emend. Fiori & Paol.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 93–187 · show in text ↑
e2

“The next best treatment was atrazine. Its effect on C. album was similar to that of metribuzin. It gave remarkable control of Phalaris minor Retz”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 435–580 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Isoproturon gave good control of Phalaris minor and Chenopodium album.

Treatment
Isoproturone1
Interactor
P. minorPhalaris minore1weed
Second interactor
C. albumChenopodium albume1weed
Outcome
controle1
Direction
goode1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Phalaris minor
Phalaris minor · Interactor · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryMatt Lavin from Bozeman, Montana, USA · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Chenopodium album
Chenopodium album · Second interactorOlivier Pichard · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“effect of 4 herbicides on weeds and yield of wheat (Triticum aestivum L. emend. Fiori & Paol.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 93–187 · show in text ↑
e1

“Isoproturon gave good control of P. minor and C. album”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 683–737 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Sulfosulfuron and tralkoxydim were both effective against Phalaris minor.

Treatment
Both the herbicidese1
Interactor
P. minorPhalaris minore1weed
Outcome
effective against P. minore1
Direction
effectivee1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Phalaris minor
Phalaris minor · Interactor · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryMatt Lavin from Bozeman, Montana, USA · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“effect of 4 herbicides on weeds and yield of wheat (Triticum aestivum L. emend. Fiori & Paol.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 93–187 · show in text ↑
e1

“Both the herbicides were effective against P. minor”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 893–944 · show in text ↑

isoproturon · Phalaris minor · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

24 papers: 18 positive, 6 negative or no effect

17 papers in the same direction as this paper · 6 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

20 papers more in this group

See all 24 papers →

metribuzin · weed · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

63 papers: 60 positive, 3 negative or no effect

59 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. negative

59 papers more in this group

See all 63 papers →

metribuzin · Chenopodium album · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results agree

3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

atrazine · Phalaris minor · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results agree

3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

competition · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results differ

35 papers: 3 positive, 32 negative or no effect

31 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

31 papers more in this group

See all 35 papers →

herbicide · Phalaris minor · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

39 papers: 37 positive, 2 negative or no effect

36 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. positive

35 papers more in this group

See all 39 papers →

herbicide · weed · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

401 papers: 362 positive, 39 negative or no effect

361 papers in the same direction as this paper · 34 in the opposite direction · 5 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. negative

397 papers more in this group

See all 401 papers →

herbicide · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

563 papers: 466 positive, 97 negative or no effect

465 papers in the same direction as this paper · 87 in the opposite direction · 10 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

559 papers more in this group

See all 563 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.