Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Use of these herbicides increased wheat grain yield by 200% or more compared with the weedy check.

A claim from Isoproturon-Resistant Littleseed Canarygrass (Phalaris minor) and its Response to Alternate Herbicides1 · 2002

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Use of these herbicides increased wheat grain yield by 200% or more compared with the weedy check.

Treatment
use of these herbicidese7
Interactor
littleseed canarygrassPhalaris minore6weed
Outcome
grain yielde7
Direction
increasede7
Value
200% or moree7
Comparator
weedy checke7

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageSecond interactorSecond interactor roleSettingQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Phalaris minor
Phalaris minor · Interactor · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryMatt Lavin from Bozeman, Montana, USA · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e6

“The herbicides observed to be effective in wheat against isoproturon-resistant littleseed canarygrass were CGA 184927 (50 to 60 g ai/ha), fenoxaprop-p-ethyl (100 to 120 g/ha), ICIA 0604 (350 g ai/ha), and MON 37503 (25 g ai/ha)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1164–1391
e7

“The use of these herbicides increased the grain yield by 200% or more when compared with the weedy check”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1393–1497

Title

Isoproturon-Resistant Littleseed Canarygrass (Phalaris minor) and its Response to Alternate Herbicides1

R. S. CHHOKAR; R. K. MALIK Weed Technology 2002. doi:10.1614/0890-037x(2002)016[0116:irlcpm]2.0.co;2

Other claims from this paper (14)

Record rev-b0aa923c87939a2e284691ca85cc3b589550694baeb762e281c79d5ece7b2a4d · schema claims-v0.9 · position 11 in the model’s answer

herbicide · Phalaris minor · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

39 papers: 37 positive, 2 negative or no effect

36 papers in the same direction as this claim · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. negative
  4. no effect
  5. positive
  6. positive
  7. positive
  8. positive

30 papers more in this group

See all 39 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.