Paper · 2016 · Planta Daninha

Identifying Optimum Herbicide Mixtures to Manage and Avoid Fenoxaprop-p-Ethyl Resistant Phalaris minor in Wheat

T. ABBAS; M.A. NADEEM; A. TANVEER; et al.

8
claims
12
verbatim quotes
16
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by-nc

Abstract

ABSTRACT Use of herbicide mixtures has been advocated as most effective strategy for avoidance and management of herbicide resistant weeds. Effect of twelve selected treatments of four herbicides (clodinafop-propargil, metribuzin, pinoxaden and sulfosulfuron) two-way mixtures at different doses was investigated against fenoxaprop-p-ethyl resistant and susceptible populations of P. minor grown along the wheat plants. In repeated experiment, herbicides mixtures were applied at 3 to 4 leaf stage of P. minor under greenhouse conditions. All the herbicide mixtures were effective to control resistant as well as susceptible P. minor. Mixtures having 75% lethal dose of each mixture component provided best control against P. minor. Mixtures with 50% lethal dose of each herbicide also provided more than 80% control of P. minor. Surviving P. minor plants after exposure to herbicide mixtures showed reduced growth and seed production potential. No mixture combination produced phytotoxic effects on wheat plant up to 75% of lethal dose of each mixture component. Mixtures including clodinafop-propargil + metribuzin, pinoxaden + sulfosulfuron and pinoxaden + metribuzin at 100% dose of each mixture component produced minor phytotoxic effects on wheat plants and caused no reduction in terms of ultimate growth and grain yield. However, mixture of sulfosulfuron + clodinafop-propargil at 100% dose of each component was phytotoxic to wheat and caused significant reduction in term of growth and grain yield. So, farmers can use these mixtures even at 75% of recommended dose of mixture component to control susceptible and resistant P. minor in wheat.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by-nc. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 8

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

All mixtures controlled resistant and susceptible P. minor.

Treatment
herbicide mixturese0
Interactor
P. minorPhalaris minore0weed
Outcome
control resistant as well as susceptible P. minore0
Direction
effectivee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Phalaris minor
Phalaris minor · Interactor · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryMatt Lavin from Bozeman, Montana, USA · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“All the herbicide mixtures were effective to control resistant as well as susceptible P. minor”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 539–633 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 106–111 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Mixtures with 75% lethal dose of each component gave the best weed control.

Treatment
Mixtures having 75% lethal dose of each mixture componente0
Interactor
P. minorPhalaris minore0weed
Outcome
control against P. minore0
Direction
beste0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Phalaris minor
Phalaris minor · Interactor · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryMatt Lavin from Bozeman, Montana, USA · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Mixtures having 75% lethal dose of each mixture component provided best control against P. minor”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 635–731 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 106–111 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Mixtures with 50% lethal dose gave over 80% weed control.

Treatment
Mixtures with 50% lethal dose of each herbicidee0
Interactor
P. minorPhalaris minore0weed
Outcome
control of P. minore0
Direction
more thane0
Value
80%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Phalaris minor
Phalaris minor · Interactor · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryMatt Lavin from Bozeman, Montana, USA · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Mixtures with 50% lethal dose of each herbicide also provided more than 80% control of P. minor”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 733–828 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 106–111 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Surviving P. minor showed reduced growth and seed production.

Treatment
herbicide mixturese0
Interactor
P. minorPhalaris minore0weed
Outcome
P. minor plants after exposure to herbicide mixtures showed reduced growth and seed production potentiale0
Direction
reducede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Phalaris minor
Phalaris minor · Interactor · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryMatt Lavin from Bozeman, Montana, USA · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Surviving P. minor plants after exposure to herbicide mixtures showed reduced growth and seed production potential”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 830–944 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 106–111 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Mixtures up to 75% lethal dose caused no wheat phytotoxicity.

Treatment
mixture combinatione0
Outcome
phytotoxic effectse0
Direction
Noe0
Qualifier
up to 75% of lethal dose of each mixture componente0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“No mixture combination produced phytotoxic effects on wheat plant up to 75% of lethal dose of each mixture component”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 946–1062 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmixedmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Three full-dose mixtures caused minor phytotoxicity without reduced wheat growth or grain yield.

Treatment
clodinafop-propargil + metribuzine0
Outcome
minor phytotoxic effectse0
Direction
minore0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Mixtures including clodinafop-propargil + metribuzin, pinoxaden + sulfosulfuron and pinoxaden + metribuzin at 100% dose of each mixture component produced minor phytotoxic effects on wheat plants and caused no reduction in terms of ultimate growth and grain yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1064–1327 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Full-dose sulfosulfuron plus clodinafop-propargil reduced wheat growth and grain yield.

Treatment
sulfosulfuron + clodinafop-propargil at 100% dose of each componente0
Outcome
growth and grain yielde0
Direction
reductione0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“mixture of sulfosulfuron + clodinafop-propargil at 100% dose of each component was phytotoxic to wheat and caused significant reduction in term of growth and grain yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1338–1507 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

Authors recommend mixtures at 75% recommended dose for weed control in wheat.

Interactor
P. minorPhalaris minore0weed
Outcome
use these mixtures even at 75% of recommended dose of mixture componente0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Phalaris minor
Phalaris minor · Interactor · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryMatt Lavin from Bozeman, Montana, USA · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“farmers can use these mixtures even at 75% of recommended dose of mixture component to control susceptible and resistant P. minor in wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1513–1651 · show in text ↑

herbicide · Phalaris minor · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

39 papers: 37 positive, 2 negative or no effect

36 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. positive

35 papers more in this group

See all 39 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.