Paper · 2001 · Indian Journal of Agronomy

Integrated weed management in zero-till direct-seeded rice (Oryza sativa) - wheat (Triticum aestivum) cropping system

J.S. MISHRA; V.P. SlNGH

8
claims
10
verbatim quotes
14
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

A field experiment was conducted during 2004-05 and 2005-06 on clay-loam soil at Jabalpur in Madhya Pradesh to find out the effect of integrated weed-management practices on weeds and yield of zero-till direct- seeded rice (Oryza sativa L.). Different methods of crop establishment were evaluated for getting higher produc- tivity and profitability of irrigated rice-wheat cropping system. For rice there were four methods, viz. direct seeding by zero-till drill, direct drilling in friable soil by seed drill, direct seeding of sprouted seeds in puddled soil, and transplanting; and for the succeeding wheat (Triticum aestivum L. emend. Fiori & Paol.) there were two methods, viz. sowing with zero-till drill and conventional sowing. Echinochloa colona and Commelina spp. were the major weeds in zero-till, direct-seeded rice, which reduced the grain yield by 27.4%. Pre-emergence application of pretilachlor at 750 glha or pendimethalin at 1.0 kglha each, followed by one hand-weeding at 30 days after sow- ing was on a par with hand-weeding twice, giving significantly higher grain yield (5.20 and 3.50 tlha) compared with the weedy check (3.98 and 2.25 tlha). Zero-till, direct-seeded rice with proper weed management resulted in significantly higher yield than transplanted rice. In the succeeding wheat crop, population of dominant weeds, viz. Chenopodium album and Medicago hispida, was found to be reduced when wheat was grown after zero-till, direct-seeded rice compared with other methods of rice establishment. The wheat sown after zero-till, direct- seeded rice yielded significantly higher (3.76 and 3.61 tlha) than when sown after other methods of rice estab- lishment. Zero tillage in direct-seeded rice-wheat system reduced the weed problem and increased the system productivity as well as profitability.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 8

Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Major weeds in zero till direct seeded rice reduced grain yield by 27.4%.

Interactor
Echinochloa colonaEchinochloa colonae0weed
Second interactor
Commelina spp.Commelinae0weed
Outcome
grain yielde0
Direction
reducede0
Value
27.4%e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Echinochloa colona
Echinochloa colona · InteractorTauʻolunga · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Commelina
Commelina · Second interactor · picture of the genus (one of its species)Kropsoq · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Echinochloa colona and Commelina spp. were the major weeds in zero-till, direct-seeded rice, which reduced the grain yield by 27.4%.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 735–867 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Pretilachlor followed by hand weeding gave significantly higher rice grain yield than the weedy check.

Treatment
pretilachlor at 750 glhae0
Outcome
grain yielde0
Direction
highere0
Value
5.20e0
Comparator
weedy checke0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Pre-emergence application of pretilachlor at 750 glha or pendimethalin at 1.0 kglha each, followed by one hand-weeding at 30 days after sow- ing was on a par with hand-weeding twice, giving significantly higher grain yield (5.20 and 3.50 tlha) compared with the weedy check (3.98 and 2.25 tlha).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 868–1163 · show in text ↑
t0

“rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 54–58 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Pendimethalin followed by hand weeding gave significantly higher rice grain yield than the weedy check.

Treatment
pendimethalin at 1.0 kglhae0
Outcome
grain yielde0
Direction
highere0
Value
3.50 tlhae0
Comparator
weedy checke0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Pre-emergence application of pretilachlor at 750 glha or pendimethalin at 1.0 kglha each, followed by one hand-weeding at 30 days after sow- ing was on a par with hand-weeding twice, giving significantly higher grain yield (5.20 and 3.50 tlha) compared with the weedy check (3.98 and 2.25 tlha).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 868–1163 · show in text ↑
t0

“rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 54–58 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Managed zero till direct seeded rice outyielded transplanted rice.

Treatment
Zero-till, direct-seeded rice with proper weed managemente0
Outcome
yielde0
Direction
highere0
Comparator
transplanted ricee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Zero-till, direct-seeded rice with proper weed management resulted in significantly higher yield than transplanted rice.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1164–1284 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Wheat following zero till direct seeded rice had reduced populations of dominant weeds.

Treatment
after zero-till, direct-seeded ricee0
Interactor
Chenopodium albumChenopodium albume0weed
Second interactor
Medicago hispidae0weed
Outcome
population of dominant weedse0
Direction
reducede0
Comparator
other methods of rice establishmente0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Chenopodium album
Chenopodium album · InteractorOlivier Pichard · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“population of dominant weeds, viz. Chenopodium album and Medicago hispida, was found to be reduced when wheat was grown after zero-till, direct-seeded rice compared with other methods of rice establishment.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1315–1521 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Wheat sown after zero till direct seeded rice had significantly higher yield.

Treatment
after zero-till, direct- seeded ricee0
Outcome
yieldede0
Direction
highere0
Value
3.76 and 3.61 tlhae0
Comparator
other methods of rice estab- lishmente0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The wheat sown after zero-till, direct- seeded rice yielded significantly higher (3.76 and 3.61 tlha) than when sown after other methods of rice estab- lishment.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1522–1683 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Zero tillage reduced weeds in the rice wheat system.

Taxon
rice-wheate0
Treatment
Zero tillagee0
Outcome
weed probleme0
Direction
reducede0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“Zero tillage in direct-seeded rice-wheat system reduced the weed problem and increased the system productivity as well as profitability.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1684–1820 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Zero tillage increased rice wheat system productivity and profitability.

Taxon
rice-wheate0
Treatment
Zero tillagee0
Outcome
system productivity as well as profitabilitye0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“Zero tillage in direct-seeded rice-wheat system reduced the weed problem and increased the system productivity as well as profitability.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1684–1820 · show in text ↑

Pretilachlor · yield · Oryza sativa (rice)Results differ

141 papers: 133 positive, 8 negative or no effect

132 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction · 5 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. negative
  3. negative

137 papers more in this group

See all 141 papers →

pendimethalin · yield · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

135 papers: 126 positive, 9 negative or no effect

125 papers in the same direction as this paper · 5 in the opposite direction · 4 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. negative

131 papers more in this group

See all 135 papers →

Oryza sativa · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

154 papers: 128 positive, 26 negative or no effect

127 papers in the same direction as this paper · 23 in the opposite direction · 3 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

150 papers more in this group

See all 154 papers →

transplanting · Chenopodium album · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect

1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
See all 2 papers →

tillage · Chenopodium album · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

8 papers: 6 positive, 2 negative or no effect

5 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. positive

4 papers more in this group

See all 8 papers →

tillage · yield · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

729 papers: 587 positive, 142 negative or no effect

586 papers in the same direction as this paper · 115 in the opposite direction · 27 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. negative

725 papers more in this group

See all 729 papers →

herbicide · yield · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

802 papers: 725 positive, 77 negative or no effect

724 papers in the same direction as this paper · 57 in the opposite direction · 20 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

798 papers more in this group

See all 802 papers →

transplanting · yield · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

1,078 papers: 922 positive, 156 negative or no effect

921 papers in the same direction as this paper · 132 in the opposite direction · 24 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

1,074 papers more in this group

See all 1,078 papers →

8 of 9 groups shown: named compounds and organisms first, then groups whose results differ (checked claim by claim), then those with positive and negative results, then the smaller groups.

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.