Paper · 2022 · International Journal of Plant & Soil Science

Bio-efficacy of Herbicides with Different Water Volumes and Spray Timing under Zero Tillage Rice Residue Retention Scenario against Phalaris minor in Wheat

Ankur Chaudhary; Dharam Bir Yadav; Samunder Singh; et al.

2
claims
2
verbatim quotes
3
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

Background: Continuous use of the similar modes of action-based herbicides leads to the development of herbicide resistance in wheat-associated weeds in north-west India. Accelerated development of multiple resistance against most of the available post-emergence herbicides emphasize the use of pre-emergence herbicides. But, the efficacy of pre-emergence herbicide is a matter of concern as surface retained stubbles and/or straw alter herbicide efficacy associated with a direct interception of herbicide. Methods: A field study was conducted for two rabi seasons (2018-19 and 2019-20) to optimize spray volume and time of application for improving the bio-efficacy of pre-emergence herbicides under zero tillage full rice residue scenario. The herbicidal treatments (g/ha) included pendimethalin + pyroxasulfone (1000.0+127.5) as pre-emergence (PE), pyroxasulfone (127.5) as PE, pyroxasulfone (127.5) as early post emergence (EPoE), aclonifen+diflufenican (1002+200) EPoE, halauxifen methyl+ fluroxypyr (7.3+233.4) as EPoE, flumioxazin (100) as PE with two different water volumes 500 and 1000 liter/ha along with pendimethalin fb pinoxaden (1500+50) in 500 l/ha water volume, pendimethalin (1500) as PE in 375 l/ha water volume, weed free and weedy check. Results: The present study showed that pendimethalin + pyroxasulfone as PE with a higher spray volume of 1000 l/ha and alone application of pyroxasulfone as EPoE produced similar Phalaris minor control as with pendimethalin fb pinoxaden (PE fb Post) under full rice residue scenario in zero-till wheat.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 2

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Pre-emergence pendimethalin plus pyroxasulfone at 1000 l/ha gave similar Phalaris minor control to pendimethalin followed by pinoxaden.

Treatment
pendimethalin + pyroxasulfone as PE with a higher spray volume of 1000 l/hae0
Interactor
Phalaris minorPhalaris minore0weed
Outcome
Phalaris minor controle0
Direction
similare0
Comparator
pendimethalin fb pinoxadene0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Phalaris minor
Phalaris minor · Interactor · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryMatt Lavin from Bozeman, Montana, USA · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“pendimethalin + pyroxasulfone as PE with a higher spray volume of 1000 l/ha and alone application of pyroxasulfone as EPoE produced similar Phalaris minor control as with pendimethalin fb pinoxaden (PE fb Post) under full rice residue scenario in zero-till wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1299–1561 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Early post-emergence pyroxasulfone gave similar Phalaris minor control to pendimethalin followed by pinoxaden.

Treatment
pyroxasulfone as EPoEe0
Interactor
Phalaris minorPhalaris minore0weed
Outcome
Phalaris minor controle0
Direction
similare0
Comparator
pendimethalin fb pinoxadene0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Phalaris minor
Phalaris minor · Interactor · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryMatt Lavin from Bozeman, Montana, USA · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“alone application of pyroxasulfone as EPoE produced similar Phalaris minor control as with pendimethalin fb pinoxaden (PE fb Post) under full rice residue scenario in zero-till wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1379–1561 · show in text ↑

pendimethalin · Phalaris minor · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

19 papers: 18 positive, 1 negative or no effect

17 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. no effect
  3. positive

15 papers more in this group

See all 19 papers →

pyroxasulfone · Phalaris minor · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results agree

10 papers: 10 positive, 0 negative or no effect

9 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

6 papers more in this group

See all 10 papers →

herbicide · Phalaris minor · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

39 papers: 37 positive, 2 negative or no effect

36 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. positive

35 papers more in this group

See all 39 papers →

application · Phalaris minor · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results agree

5 papers: 5 positive, 0 negative or no effect

4 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

1 paper more in this group

See all 5 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.