Paper · 2019 · Indian Journal of Weed Science

Control of herbicide resistant Phalaris minor by pyroxasulfone in wheat

Tarundeep Kaur; M.S. Bhullar; Simerjeet Kaur

4
claims
8
verbatim quotes
15
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

Evolution of multiple herbicide resistance in Phalaris minor in wheat has resulted from the repeated use of herbicides with a similar mode of action which could threaten the sustainability of the rice-wheat cropping system in North-West India. In this context, field studies were conducted at Research Farm, Department of Agronomy, Punjab Agricultural University, Ludhiana during 2011–12, 2012–13 and 2013–14 in randomized block design replicated four times and at farmer's field during 2016–17 and 2017–18 with the objective to evaluate the efficacy of herbicide with alternative mechanism of action for the control of resistant P. minor in wheat. The treatments included pyroxasulfone 85, 102, 127.5 g/ha, pendimethalin 750 g/ha as pre-emergence (PE), sulfosulfuron 25 g/ha, clodinafop 60 g/ha as postemergence (PoE) and unsprayed control. However, the treatments during 2013–14 included pyroxasulfone 85, 102, 127.5 g/ha, pendimethalin 750 g/ha and unsprayed control with pendimethalin 1125 g/ha as PE at farmers’ field instead of pendimethalin 750 g/ha. The results indicated that pyroxasulfone at 127.5 g/ha recorded effective control of P. minor and its biomass and gave the highest wheat grain yield (4.87, 4.80 and 5.43 t/ha) during 2011–12, 2012–13 and 2013–14, respectively At farmer's field, pyroxasulfone 127.5 g/ha has been found effective against the resistant populations of Phalaris with 5.37 and 5.42 t/ha grain yield. The current study demonstrated that PE application of pyroxasulfone at 127.5 g/ha would be a suitable option for the control of resistant populations of Phalaris in wheat in Punjab.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 4

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Pyroxasulfone at 127.5 g/ha effectively controlled P. minor and its biomass.

Treatment
pyroxasulfone at 127.5 g/hae0
Interactor
P. minorPhalaris minore0weed
Outcome
control of P. minor and its biomasse0
Direction
effective controle0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Phalaris minor
Phalaris minor · Interactor · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryMatt Lavin from Bozeman, Montana, USA · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 66–71 · show in text ↑
e0

“pyroxasulfone at 127.5 g/ha recorded effective control of P. minor and its biomass”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1085–1167 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Pyroxasulfone at 127.5 g/ha gave the highest wheat grain yields of 4.87, 4.80 and 5.43 t/ha in the three research farm seasons.

Outcome
wheat grain yielde0
Direction
higheste0
Value
4.87, 4.80 and 5.43 t/hae0
Qualifier
2011–12, 2012–13 and 2013–14e0

Not reportedTreatmentComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 66–71 · show in text ↑
e0

“gave the highest wheat grain yield (4.87, 4.80 and 5.43 t/ha) during 2011–12, 2012–13 and 2013–14”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1172–1269 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

At farmers’ fields, pyroxasulfone at 127.5 g/ha controlled resistant Phalaris populations and yielded 5.37 and 5.42 t/ha grain.

Treatment
pyroxasulfone 127.5 g/hae0
Interactor
PhalarisPhalarise0weed
Outcome
grain yielde0
Value
5.37 and 5.42 t/hae0
Setting
farmer's fielde0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Phalaris
Phalaris · Interactor · picture of the genus (one of its species)Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 66–71 · show in text ↑
e0

“At farmer's field, pyroxasulfone 127.5 g/ha has been found effective against the resistant populations of Phalaris with 5.37 and 5.42 t/ha grain yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1284–1434 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors recommend pre-emergence pyroxasulfone at 127.5 g/ha to control resistant Phalaris in Punjab wheat.

Treatment
PE application of pyroxasulfone at 127.5 g/hae0
Interactor
PhalarisPhalarise0weed
Outcome
control of resistant populations of Phalarise0
Setting
Punjabe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Phalaris
Phalaris · Interactor · picture of the genus (one of its species)Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 66–71 · show in text ↑
e0

“PE application of pyroxasulfone at 127.5 g/ha would be a suitable option for the control of resistant populations of Phalaris in wheat in Punjab”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1472–1616 · show in text ↑

pyroxasulfone · Phalaris minor · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results agree

10 papers: 10 positive, 0 negative or no effect

9 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

6 papers more in this group

See all 10 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.