Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Delaying clodinafop application from 35 to 60 DAS reduced Phalaris minor control from 60 to 40% versus the unsprayed check.

A claim from Efficacy of different clodinafop-propargyl formulations against littleseed canarygrass in wheat · 2016

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Delaying clodinafop application from 35 to 60 DAS reduced Phalaris minor control from 60 to 40% versus the unsprayed check.

Treatment
delay in application time of clodinafop from 35 to 60 DASe0
Interactor
Phalaris minorPhalaris minore0weed
Outcome
Per cent control of Phalaris minore0
Direction
reducede0
Value
60 to 40%e0
Comparator
unsprayed checke0

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageSecond interactorSecond interactor roleSettingQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Phalaris minor
Phalaris minor · Interactor · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryMatt Lavin from Bozeman, Montana, USA · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 90–95
e0

“Per cent control of Phalaris minor was found to be reduced from 60 to 40% over unsprayed check with delay in application time of clodinafop from 35 to 60 DAS.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 747–905

Title

Efficacy of different clodinafop-propargyl formulations against littleseed canarygrass in wheat

Simerjeet Kaur; Tarundeep Kaur; M.S. Bhullar Indian Journal of Weed Science 2016. doi:10.5958/0974-8164.2016.00041.1

Other claims from this paper (5)

Record rev-e7fadcef936267d81aed5a4e051e54e9e7975197e90cb399953e92e67509cc67 · schema claims-v0.9 · position 6 in the model’s answer

clodinafop · Phalaris minor · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

25 papers: 23 positive, 2 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this claim · 23 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
  4. positive
  5. positive
  6. positive
  7. positive
  8. positive

16 papers more in this group

See all 25 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.