Abstract
A field experiment was conducted at CCS Haryana Agricultural University Regional Research Station, Karnal during rabi 2006–07 and 2007–08 to evaluate the efficacy of tank-mix combinations of different herbicides against Phalaris minor in wheat. The experimental field was dominated mainly by grassy weed P. minor Retz. The major weeds among broad-leaved weeds (BLW) were Coronopus didymus L., Anagallis arvensis L., Melilotus indica All. Fl. Ped., Medicago denticulata L., Rumex dentatus L., Vicia sativa L. and Lathyrus aphaca L. Intra-group combinations of herbicides viz., ACCase inhibitor (clodinafop/fenoxaprop/pinoxaden) with ACCase inhibitor and ALS inhibitor (sulfosulfuron/mesosulfuron+iodosulfuron) with ALS inhibitor were compatible and resulted in very effective control of P. minor and consequently yields of wheat (5552–5861 kg/ha in 2006–07 and 5510–5897 kg/ha in 2007–08) were comparable to weed free checks (5909 kg/ha in 2006–07 and 5850 kg/ha in 2007–08). While inter-group combinations (clodinafop/fenoxaprop/pinoxaden with sulfosulfuron/mesosulfuron+iodosulfuron) were not found compatible and resulted in lower control of P. minor with lower yields (5054–5239 kg/ha in 2006–07 and 4285–4976 kg/ha in 2007–08). Alone application and all combinations having sulfosulfuron or mesosulfuron + iodosulfuron provided good control of BLW even under inter-group combinations. There was no phyto-toxicity of any of the herbicidal treatments on wheat, except some recoverable symptoms under treatments having mesosulfuron+iodosulfuron during 2007–08.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 8
Claim · model-written summary
Intra-group tank-mix combinations (ACCase with ACCase inhibitors, ALS with ALS inhibitors) were compatible and gave very effective control of Phalaris minor in wheat.
- Taxon
- wheat
Triticum aestivumt0 - Treatment
- ACCase inhibitor (clodinafop/fenoxaprop/pinoxaden) with ACCase inhibitor and ALS inhibitor (sulfosulfuron/mesosulfuron+iodosulfuron) with ALS inhibitore1
- Interactor
- Phalaris minor
.jpg?width=60)
Phalaris minort0weed - Outcome
- very effective control of P. minore1
- Setting
- CCS Haryana Agricultural University Regional Research Station, Karnale0
Not reportedComparatorDirection
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
.jpg?width=500)
Verbatim
t0“control of Phalaris minor in wheat”
e0“CCS Haryana Agricultural University Regional Research Station, Karnal”
e1“Intra-group combinations of herbicides viz., ACCase inhibitor (clodinafop/fenoxaprop/pinoxaden) with ACCase inhibitor and ALS inhibitor (sulfosulfuron/mesosulfuron+iodosulfuron) with ALS inhibitor were compatible and resulted in very effective control of P. minor”
Claim · model-written summary
With intra-group combinations, wheat yield in 2006-07 was 5552–5861 kg/ha, comparable to weed free checks (5909 kg/ha).
- Taxon
- wheatTriticum aestivumt0
- Outcome
- yields of wheate1
- Direction
- comparablee1
- Value
- 5552–5861 kg/ha in 2006–07e1
- Qualifier
- 5909 kg/ha in 2006–07e1
- Comparator
- weed free checkse1
- Setting
- CCS Haryana Agricultural University Regional Research Station, Karnale0
Not reportedTreatment
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“control of Phalaris minor in wheat”
e0“CCS Haryana Agricultural University Regional Research Station, Karnal”
e1“yields of wheat (5552–5861 kg/ha in 2006–07 and 5510–5897 kg/ha in 2007–08) were comparable to weed free checks (5909 kg/ha in 2006–07 and 5850 kg/ha in 2007–08)”
Claim · model-written summary
With intra-group combinations, wheat yield in 2007-08 was 5510–5897 kg/ha, comparable to weed free checks (5850 kg/ha).
- Taxon
- wheatTriticum aestivumt0
- Outcome
- yields of wheate1
- Direction
- comparablee1
- Value
- 5510–5897 kg/ha in 2007–08e1
- Qualifier
- 5850 kg/ha in 2007–08e1
- Comparator
- weed free checkse1
- Setting
- CCS Haryana Agricultural University Regional Research Station, Karnale0
Not reportedTreatment
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“control of Phalaris minor in wheat”
e0“CCS Haryana Agricultural University Regional Research Station, Karnal”
e1“yields of wheat (5552–5861 kg/ha in 2006–07 and 5510–5897 kg/ha in 2007–08) were comparable to weed free checks (5909 kg/ha in 2006–07 and 5850 kg/ha in 2007–08)”
Claim · model-written summary
Inter-group combinations were not compatible and gave lower control of Phalaris minor.
- Taxon
- wheatTriticum aestivumt0
- Treatment
- inter-group combinations (clodinafop/fenoxaprop/pinoxaden with sulfosulfuron/mesosulfuron+iodosulfuron)e1
- Interactor
- Phalaris minorPhalaris minort0weed
- Outcome
- control of P. minore1
- Direction
- lowere1
- Setting
- CCS Haryana Agricultural University Regional Research Station, Karnale0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“control of Phalaris minor in wheat”
e0“CCS Haryana Agricultural University Regional Research Station, Karnal”
e1“inter-group combinations (clodinafop/fenoxaprop/pinoxaden with sulfosulfuron/mesosulfuron+iodosulfuron) were not found compatible and resulted in lower control of P. minor with lower yields (5054–5239 kg/ha in 2006–07 and 4285–4976 kg/ha in 2007–08)”
Claim · model-written summary
With inter-group combinations wheat yield in 2006-07 was lower, 5054–5239 kg/ha.
- Taxon
- wheatTriticum aestivumt0
- Treatment
- inter-group combinations (clodinafop/fenoxaprop/pinoxaden with sulfosulfuron/mesosulfuron+iodosulfuron)e1
- Outcome
- yieldse1
- Direction
- lowere1
- Value
- 5054–5239 kg/ha in 2006–07e1
- Setting
- CCS Haryana Agricultural University Regional Research Station, Karnale0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“control of Phalaris minor in wheat”
e0“CCS Haryana Agricultural University Regional Research Station, Karnal”
e1“inter-group combinations (clodinafop/fenoxaprop/pinoxaden with sulfosulfuron/mesosulfuron+iodosulfuron) were not found compatible and resulted in lower control of P. minor with lower yields (5054–5239 kg/ha in 2006–07 and 4285–4976 kg/ha in 2007–08)”
Claim · model-written summary
With inter-group combinations wheat yield in 2007-08 was lower, 4285–4976 kg/ha.
- Taxon
- wheatTriticum aestivumt0
- Treatment
- inter-group combinations (clodinafop/fenoxaprop/pinoxaden with sulfosulfuron/mesosulfuron+iodosulfuron)e1
- Outcome
- yieldse1
- Direction
- lowere1
- Value
- 4285–4976 kg/ha in 2007–08e1
- Setting
- CCS Haryana Agricultural University Regional Research Station, Karnale0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“control of Phalaris minor in wheat”
e0“CCS Haryana Agricultural University Regional Research Station, Karnal”
e1“inter-group combinations (clodinafop/fenoxaprop/pinoxaden with sulfosulfuron/mesosulfuron+iodosulfuron) were not found compatible and resulted in lower control of P. minor with lower yields (5054–5239 kg/ha in 2006–07 and 4285–4976 kg/ha in 2007–08)”
Claim · model-written summary
Alone application and all combinations containing sulfosulfuron or mesosulfuron + iodosulfuron gave good control of broad-leaved weeds, even under inter-group combinations.
- Taxon
- wheatTriticum aestivumt0
- Treatment
- Alone application and all combinations having sulfosulfuron or mesosulfuron + iodosulfurone1
- Interactor
- BLWe1weed
- Outcome
- good control of BLWe1
- Setting
- CCS Haryana Agricultural University Regional Research Station, Karnale0
Not reportedComparatorDirection
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“control of Phalaris minor in wheat”
e0“CCS Haryana Agricultural University Regional Research Station, Karnal”
e1“Alone application and all combinations having sulfosulfuron or mesosulfuron + iodosulfuron provided good control of BLW even under inter-group combinations”
Claim · model-written summary
None of the herbicide treatments was phytotoxic to wheat, except some recoverable symptoms under mesosulfuron+iodosulfuron treatments in 2007-08.
- Taxon
- wheatTriticum aestivume1
- Treatment
- herbicidal treatmentse1
- Outcome
- phyto-toxicitye1
- Qualifier
- except some recoverable symptoms under treatments having mesosulfuron+iodosulfuron during 2007–08e1
- Setting
- CCS Haryana Agricultural University Regional Research Station, Karnale0
Not reportedComparatorDirection
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“control of Phalaris minor in wheat”
e0“CCS Haryana Agricultural University Regional Research Station, Karnal”
e1“There was no phyto-toxicity of any of the herbicidal treatments on wheat, except some recoverable symptoms under treatments having mesosulfuron+iodosulfuron during 2007–08”
The same questions in other papers
pinoxaden · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results differ
3 papers in the same direction as this paper · 26 in the opposite direction
- positive
- positive
- positive
26 papers more in this group
See all 30 papers →pinoxaden · Phalaris minor · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results
15 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction
- negative
- positive
- positive
13 papers more in this group
See all 17 papers →clodinafop · Phalaris minor · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results
22 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction
- no effect
- negative
- positive
21 papers more in this group
See all 25 papers →clodinafop · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results
2 papers in the same direction as this paper · 57 in the opposite direction
- positive
- positive
- positive
56 papers more in this group
See all 60 papers →herbicide · crop injury · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results
19 papers in the same direction as this paper · 32 in the opposite direction
- negative
- negative
- no effect
48 papers more in this group
See all 52 papers →Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.