Paper · 2013 · Indian Journal of Weed Science

Herbicide combinations for broad-spectrum weed control in wheat

Suresh Kumar; S.S. Rana; Ramesh; et al.

16
claims
33
verbatim quotes
16
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Ten treatments, viz. clodinafop 60 g/ha, sulfosulfuron 25 g/ha, metribuzin 175 g/ha, pinoxaden 50 g/ha, clodinafop 60 + metribuzin 105 and 122.5 g/ha, sulfosulfuron 25 + metribuzin 105 g/ha, sulfosulfuron 25 + pinoxaden + 40 g/ha, weed free and unweeded check were tested during the Rabi season of 2010-11 and 2011-12 at Palampur. Grassy weeds (Phalaris minor, Avena ludoviciana, Poa annua and Lolium temulentum) constituted 90% of the total weed flora. All the weed control treatments were significantly superior to weedy check in curtailing dry weight of Phalaris, Avena and Vicia sativa. Metribuzin remaining at par with sulfosulfuron effectively reduced the dry weight of Poa annua. Clodinafop alone was least effective against Poa annua. Weed free, clodinafop, pinoxaden, clodinafop + metribuzin resulted in significant reduction in the dry weight of L. temulentum. Clodinafop 60 g/ha + metribuzin 122.5 g/ha, clodinafop 60 g/ha + metribuzin 105 g/ha, pinoxaden 50 g/ha and weed free resulted in significantly higher grain yield of wheat. Weeds reduced grain yield of wheat by 59.3%. Grain yield was negatively associated with weed count and weed biomass and positively associated with plant height, spike length, spikelets/spike and effective tillers. With every 1 g/m 2 increase in weed dry weight, the grain yield of wheat was expected to fall by 41.55 kg/ha. The economic threshold levels (number of weeds/unit area) with weed management practices varied between 2.6-45.4/m 2 . Clodinafop 60 g/ha + metribuzin 122.5 g/ ha resulted in highest weed control efficiency, crop resistance index and efficiency index. It gave lowest weed persistence index and weed index. Clodinafop 60 g/ha + metribuzin 122.5 g/ha resulted in highest net return due to weed control. Metribuzin 175 g/ha resulted in the highest marginal benefit: cost ratio.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 16

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

All weed control treatments significantly reduced the dry weight of Phalaris, Avena and Vicia sativa compared with the weedy check.

Treatment
weed control treatmentse1
Interactor
PhalarisPhalarise1weed
Second interactor
AvenaAvenae1weed
Outcome
dry weighte1
Direction
curtailinge1
Comparator
weedy checke1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Phalaris
Phalaris · Interactor · picture of the genus (one of its species)Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Avena
Avena · Second interactor · picture of the genus (one of its species)Sendelbach ( talk ) · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“weed control in wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 42–63 · show in text ↑
e1

“All the weed control treatments were significantly superior to weedy check in curtailing dry weight of Phalaris, Avena and Vicia sativa”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 454–589 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Metribuzin, at par with sulfosulfuron, effectively reduced the dry weight of Poa annua.

Treatment
Metribuzine2
Interactor
Poa annuaPoa annuae2weed
Outcome
dry weighte2
Direction
reducede2
Comparator
sulfosulfurone2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Poa annua
Poa annua · InteractorKristian Peters -- Fabelfroh 10:06, 7 May 2007 (UTC) · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“weed control in wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 42–63 · show in text ↑
e2

“Metribuzin remaining at par with sulfosulfuron effectively reduced the dry weight of Poa annua”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 591–685 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Clodinafop alone was the least effective treatment against Poa annua.

Treatment
Clodinafop alonee3
Interactor
Poa annuaPoa annuae3weed
Outcome
least effectivee3
Direction
least effectivee3

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Poa annua
Poa annua · InteractorKristian Peters -- Fabelfroh 10:06, 7 May 2007 (UTC) · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“weed control in wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 42–63 · show in text ↑
e3

“Clodinafop alone was least effective against Poa annua”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 687–741 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Weed free, clodinafop, pinoxaden and clodinafop + metribuzin significantly reduced the dry weight of L. temulentum.

Treatment
Weed free, clodinafop, pinoxaden, clodinafop + metribuzine4
Interactor
L. temulentumLolium temulentume4weed
Outcome
dry weighte4
Direction
significant reductione4

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Lolium temulentum
Lolium temulentum · InteractorH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“weed control in wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 42–63 · show in text ↑
e4

“Weed free, clodinafop, pinoxaden, clodinafop + metribuzin resulted in significant reduction in the dry weight of L. temulentum”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 743–869 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Clodinafop + metribuzin (122.5 and 105 g/ha) and pinoxaden 50 g/ha significantly increased wheat grain yield.

Treatment
Clodinafop 60 g/ha + metribuzin 122.5 g/ha, clodinafop 60 g/ha + metribuzin 105 g/ha, pinoxaden 50 g/hae5
Outcome
grain yielde5
Direction
significantly highere5

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“weed control in wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 42–63 · show in text ↑
e5

“Clodinafop 60 g/ha + metribuzin 122.5 g/ha, clodinafop 60 g/ha + metribuzin 105 g/ha, pinoxaden 50 g/ha and weed free resulted in significantly higher grain yield of wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 871–1042 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Weed free significantly increased wheat grain yield.

Treatment
weed freee5
Outcome
grain yielde5
Direction
significantly highere5

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“weed control in wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 42–63 · show in text ↑
e5

“Clodinafop 60 g/ha + metribuzin 122.5 g/ha, clodinafop 60 g/ha + metribuzin 105 g/ha, pinoxaden 50 g/ha and weed free resulted in significantly higher grain yield of wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 871–1042 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Grain yield was negatively associated with weed count and weed biomass.

Treatment
weed count and weed biomasse6
Outcome
Grain yielde6
Direction
negatively associatede6

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“weed control in wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 42–63 · show in text ↑
e6

“Grain yield was negatively associated with weed count and weed biomass and positively associated with plant height, spike length, spikelets/spike and effective tillers”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1089–1256 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Grain yield was positively associated with plant height, spike length and spikelets per spike.

Treatment
plant height, spike length, spikelets/spikee6
Outcome
Grain yielde6
Direction
positively associatede6

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“weed control in wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 42–63 · show in text ↑
e6

“Grain yield was negatively associated with weed count and weed biomass and positively associated with plant height, spike length, spikelets/spike and effective tillers”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1089–1256 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Grain yield was positively associated with effective tillers.

Treatment
effective tillerse6
Outcome
Grain yielde6
Direction
positively associatede6

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“weed control in wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 42–63 · show in text ↑
e6

“Grain yield was negatively associated with weed count and weed biomass and positively associated with plant height, spike length, spikelets/spike and effective tillers”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1089–1256 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Each 1 g/m2 increase in weed dry weight was expected to reduce wheat grain yield by 41.55 kg/ha.

Treatment
weed dry weighte7
Outcome
grain yielde7
Direction
falle7
Value
41.55 kg/hae7

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“weed control in wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 42–63 · show in text ↑
e7

“With every 1 g/m 2 increase in weed dry weight, the grain yield of wheat was expected to fall by 41.55 kg/ha”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1258–1366 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Weeds reduced wheat grain yield by 59.3%.

Treatment
Weedse1
Interactor
Weedse1weed
Outcome
grain yielde1
Direction
reducede1
Value
59.3%e1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“weed control in wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 42–63 · show in text ↑
e1

“Weeds reduced grain yield of wheat by 59.3%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1044–1087 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The economic threshold level varied between 2.6 and 45.4 weeds per m2 across weed management practices.

Interactor
weedse1weed
Outcome
economic threshold levelse1
Value
2.6-45.4/m 2e1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“weed control in wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 42–63 · show in text ↑
e1

“The economic threshold levels (number of weeds/unit area) with weed management practices varied between 2.6-45.4/m 2”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1368–1484 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Clodinafop 60 g/ha + metribuzin 122.5 g/ha gave the highest weed control efficiency, crop resistance index and efficiency index.

Treatment
Clodinafop 60 g/ha + metribuzin 122.5 g/ hae1
Outcome
weed control efficiency, crop resistance index and efficiency indexe1
Direction
higheste1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“weed control in wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 42–63 · show in text ↑
e1

“Clodinafop 60 g/ha + metribuzin 122.5 g/ ha resulted in highest weed control efficiency, crop resistance index and efficiency index”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1487–1618 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Clodinafop 60 g/ha + metribuzin 122.5 g/ha gave the lowest weed persistence index and weed index.

Treatment
Clodinafop 60 g/ha + metribuzin 122.5 g/ hae2
Outcome
weed persistence index and weed indexe1
Direction
loweste1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“weed control in wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 42–63 · show in text ↑
e1

“It gave lowest weed persistence index and weed index”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1620–1672 · show in text ↑
e2

“Clodinafop 60 g/ha + metribuzin 122.5 g/ ha resulted in highest weed control efficiency, crop resistance index and efficiency index”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1487–1618 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Clodinafop 60 g/ha + metribuzin 122.5 g/ha gave the highest net return due to weed control.

Treatment
Clodinafop 60 g/ha + metribuzin 122.5 g/hae1
Outcome
net returne1
Direction
higheste1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“weed control in wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 42–63 · show in text ↑
e1

“Clodinafop 60 g/ha + metribuzin 122.5 g/ha resulted in highest net return due to weed control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1674–1767 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Metribuzin 175 g/ha gave the highest marginal benefit: cost ratio.

Treatment
Metribuzin 175 g/hae1
Outcome
marginal benefit: cost ratioe1
Direction
higheste1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“weed control in wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 42–63 · show in text ↑
e1

“Metribuzin 175 g/ha resulted in the highest marginal benefit: cost ratio”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1769–1841 · show in text ↑

pinoxaden · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results differ

30 papers: 26 positive, 4 negative or no effect

25 papers in the same direction as this paper · 4 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. negative

26 papers more in this group

See all 30 papers →

metribuzin · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results differ

75 papers: 45 positive, 30 negative or no effect

44 papers in the same direction as this paper · 27 in the opposite direction · 3 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. no effect

71 papers more in this group

See all 75 papers →

clodinafop · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

60 papers: 57 positive, 3 negative or no effect

56 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. negative
  3. negative

56 papers more in this group

See all 60 papers →

clodinafop · weed · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

61 papers: 54 positive, 7 negative or no effect

53 papers in the same direction as this paper · 7 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. negative
  3. negative

57 papers more in this group

See all 61 papers →

metribuzin · weed · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

63 papers: 60 positive, 3 negative or no effect

59 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. negative

59 papers more in this group

See all 63 papers →

metribuzin · disease · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results agree

4 papers: 4 positive, 0 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
See all 4 papers →

herbicide · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

563 papers: 466 positive, 97 negative or no effect

465 papers in the same direction as this paper · 87 in the opposite direction · 10 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

559 papers more in this group

See all 563 papers →

herbicide · Phalaris · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.