Paper · 2022 · Frontiers in Plant Science

Efficacy of Metribuzin Doses on Physiological, Growth, and Yield Characteristics of Wheat and Its Associated Weeds

Muhammad Mansoor Javaid; Athar Mahmood; Muhammad Izhar Naeem Bhatti; et al.

6
claims
12
verbatim quotes
20
citations
3
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

Weeds cause a serious constraint to wheat productivity. Chemical weed control is considered the most effective method to control weeds; however, a suitable dose and combination of herbicide with adjuvants play a vital role in controlling weeds and producing maximum wheat production. A field study was conducted to investigate the effectiveness of various doses of metribuzin alone or in combination with adjuvants [Bio-power (alkyl ether sulfates and sodium salts) and Ad-500 (fatty alcohol ethoxylate)] on the growth and yield of wheat and its associated weeds. Metribuzin at 175, 140, and 105 g a.i ha –1 , each in combination with adjuvants (Bio-power or Ad-500) at 400 ml ha –1 , were sprayed. A weedy check was also included as a control treatment. The wheat crop was infested with Fumaria indica , Melilotus indica , Anagallis arvensis , and Phalaris minor , and metribuzin with or without adjuvant was sprayed at two- to four-leaf stage of the weeds. The photosynthetic activity, weed population of each weed, and biomass of each weed was significantly affected by all herbicides along with the adjuvant. However, maximum inhibition of tested weeds was observed where metribuzin at 175 g a.i ha –1 + Bio-power at 400 ml ha –1 were sprayed. Metribuzin sprayed at 175 g a.i ha –1 with or without Bio-power recorded a maximum 1,000-grain weight, biological yield, and grain yield. Conclusively, metribuzin sprayed at 175 g a.i ha –1 + Bio-power at 400 at ml ha –1 have the potential to improve wheat yield by inhibiting weed growth, and Bio-power was superior to Ad-500 in improving the efficacy of metribuzin against weeds of wheat crop.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 6

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Herbicide plus adjuvant significantly affected wheat photosynthetic activity.

Treatment
all herbicides along with the adjuvante0
Outcome
photosynthetic activitye0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The photosynthetic activity, weed population of each weed, and biomass of each weed was significantly affected by all herbicides along with the adjuvant.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 959–1112 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 84–89 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Herbicide plus adjuvant significantly affected weed populations and biomass.

Treatment
all herbicides along with the adjuvante0
Interactor
weedse1weed
Outcome
weed population of each weed, and biomass of each weede0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The photosynthetic activity, weed population of each weed, and biomass of each weed was significantly affected by all herbicides along with the adjuvant.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 959–1112 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 84–89 · show in text ↑
e1

“maximum inhibition of tested weeds was observed where metribuzin at 175 g a.i ha –1 + Bio-power at 400 ml ha –1 were sprayed.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1122–1247 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Metribuzin 175 g a.i ha –1 with Bio-power 400 ml ha –1 gave maximum weed inhibition.

Treatment
metribuzin at 175 g a.i ha –1 + Bio-power at 400 ml ha –1e0
Interactor
weedse0weed
Outcome
inhibition of tested weedse0
Direction
maximume0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“maximum inhibition of tested weeds was observed where metribuzin at 175 g a.i ha –1 + Bio-power at 400 ml ha –1 were sprayed.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1122–1247 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 84–89 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Metribuzin 175 g a.i ha –1 with or without Bio-power maximized grain weight and biological and grain yield.

Treatment
Metribuzin sprayed at 175 g a.i ha –1 with or without Bio-powere0
Outcome
1,000-grain weight, biological yield, and grain yielde0
Direction
maximume0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Metribuzin sprayed at 175 g a.i ha –1 with or without Bio-power recorded a maximum 1,000-grain weight, biological yield, and grain yield.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1248–1385 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 84–89 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Bio-power was superior to Ad-500 in improving metribuzin efficacy against wheat weeds.

Treatment
Bio-powere0
Interactor
weedse0weed
Outcome
efficacy of metribuzin against weedse0
Direction
superiore0
Comparator
Ad-500e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Bio-power was superior to Ad-500 in improving the efficacy of metribuzin against weeds of wheat crop.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1542–1643 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors conclude that 175 g a.i ha –1 metribuzin plus 400 ml ha –1 Bio-power can improve wheat yield by inhibiting weeds.

Interactor
weede0weed
Outcome
metribuzin sprayed at 175 g a.i ha –1 + Bio-power at 400 at ml ha –1e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“metribuzin sprayed at 175 g a.i ha –1 + Bio-power at 400 at ml ha –1 have the potential to improve wheat yield by inhibiting weed growth”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1400–1536 · show in text ↑
e1

“wheat yield by inhibiting weed growth”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1499–1536 · show in text ↑

metribuzin · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results differ

75 papers: 45 positive, 30 negative or no effect

44 papers in the same direction as this paper · 27 in the opposite direction · 3 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. negative

71 papers more in this group

See all 75 papers →

metribuzin · disease · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results agree

4 papers: 4 positive, 0 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
See all 4 papers →

application · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

877 papers: 795 positive, 82 negative or no effect

794 papers in the same direction as this paper · 75 in the opposite direction · 7 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. no effect
  3. negative

873 papers more in this group

See all 877 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.