Abstract
Of 15 hard red winter wheat ( Triticum aestivum L.) cultivars grown on several soil types and treated in the spring with several rates of metribuzin [4-amino-6- tert -butyl-3-(methylthio)- as -triazine-5(4 H )-one], ‘Lindon’ and ‘Vona’ were the most sensitive and ‘TAM W 101’ and ‘Osage’ the most tolerant. Differences in cultivar response to metribuzin occurred in 9 of 13 locations, but were not observed when precipitation was very light or when the soil was saturated at the time of treatment. TAM W 101 was also more tolerant than Vona in the greenhouse.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 5
Claim · model-written summary
Wheat cultivars Lindon and Vona were the most sensitive to metribuzin among 15 cultivars.
- Taxon
- Wheat
Triticum aestivumt0 - Material
- ‘Lindon’ and ‘Vona’e0
- Treatment
- Metribuzint1
- Outcome
- sensitivee0
- Direction
- most sensitivee0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“Wheat (Triticum aestivum)”
t1“Metribuzin”
e0“‘Lindon’ and ‘Vona’ were the most sensitive”
Claim · model-written summary
Wheat cultivars TAM W 101 and Osage were the most tolerant to metribuzin among 15 cultivars.
- Taxon
- WheatTriticum aestivumt0
- Material
- ‘TAM W 101’ and ‘Osage’e0
- Treatment
- Metribuzint1
- Outcome
- tolerante0
- Direction
- most tolerante0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“Wheat (Triticum aestivum)”
t1“Metribuzin”
e0“‘TAM W 101’ and ‘Osage’ the most tolerant”
Claim · model-written summary
Differences among wheat cultivars in response to metribuzin occurred in 9 of 13 locations.
- Taxon
- WheatTriticum aestivumt0
- Outcome
- Differences in cultivar response to metribuzine0
- Value
- 9 of 13 locationse0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“Wheat (Triticum aestivum)”
e0“Differences in cultivar response to metribuzin occurred in 9 of 13 locations”
Claim · model-written summary
Differences among wheat cultivars in response to metribuzin were not observed when precipitation was very light or when the soil was saturated at the time of treatment.
- Taxon
- WheatTriticum aestivumt0
- Outcome
- Differences in cultivar response to metribuzine0
- Qualifier
- not observed when precipitation was very light or when the soil was saturated at the time of treatmente0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“Wheat (Triticum aestivum)”
e0“Differences in cultivar response to metribuzin occurred in 9 of 13 locations, but were not observed when precipitation was very light or when the soil was saturated at the time of treatment”
Claim · model-written summary
In the greenhouse, wheat cultivar TAM W 101 was more tolerant to metribuzin than Vona.
- Taxon
- WheatTriticum aestivumt0
- Material
- TAM W 101e0
- Treatment
- Metribuzint1
- Outcome
- tolerante0
- Direction
- more tolerante0
- Comparator
- Vonae0
- Setting
- greenhousee0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“Wheat (Triticum aestivum)”
t1“Metribuzin”
e0“TAM W 101 was also more tolerant than Vona in the greenhouse”
The same questions in other papers
metribuzin · disease · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results agree
3 papers in the same direction as this paper
- positive
- positive
- positive
Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.