Paper · 2002 · Pesticide Research Journal

Optimization of Metribuzin use for Controlling Isoproturon-Resistant Phalaris minor Retz. in Wheat

T. K. Das; N. T. Yaduraju

12
claims
24
verbatim quotes
7
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

The dry biomass of resistant Phalaris minor was significantly reduced in T2 (metribuzin 150g + 500 + 5WAS) and T4 (metribuzin 150g + 500 + 6WAS) than in T1 (metribuzin 150g + 250 + 5WAS) in the first year. Otherwise all other metribuzin treatments remained at par with T2 and T4. T6 (metribuzin 200g + 500 + 5 WAS) also caused a drastic reduction in resistant P. minor's biomass. However, T caused maximum reduction in dry matter production of the broad-leaved as well as of total (composite) weeds and registered a significant increase in the number of ear-bearing tillers and grain yield of wheat. The number of ear-bearing tillers was significantly reduced at the higher dose at 120kg N ha−1 than at the lower dose (60 kg N ha−1) and accordingly the wheat grain yield. In the second year, the population and fresh biomass accumulation of resistant P. minor, wild oat and total weeds were significantly reduced in all the metribuzin treatments compared to T10 (unweeded control). The resistant P. minor fresh biomass was however the lowest in T6 (metribuzin 200g+500 litres+4 WAS). The fresh biomass of wild oat and total weeds were significantly reduced in T9 (one hand weeding at 30 DAS) than in others except T6 and T2 T6 on the contrary caused more reduction in fresh weight as well as height of wheat plants and thus proved more phytotoxic to wheat plants. The higher dose and higher spray volume of metribuzin were more effective in reducing the population and fresh biomass accumulation of resistant P minor wild oats as well as total weeds than their respective lower levels The higher dose and higher spray volume on the contrary brought more phytotoxicitv

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 12

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Metribuzin 150g + 500 + 5WAS significantly reduced dry biomass of resistant Phalaris minor in the first year compared with metribuzin 150g + 250 + 5WAS.

Treatment
metribuzin 150g + 500 + 5WASe0
Interactor
Phalaris minorPhalaris minort0weed
Outcome
dry biomass of resistant Phalaris minore0
Direction
reducede0
Qualifier
first yeare0
Comparator
metribuzin 150g + 250 + 5WASe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Phalaris minor
Phalaris minor · Interactor · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryMatt Lavin from Bozeman, Montana, USA · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Optimization of Metribuzin use for Controlling Isoproturon-Resistant Phalaris minor Retz. in Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–98 · show in text ↑
e0

“The dry biomass of resistant Phalaris minor was significantly reduced in T2 (metribuzin 150g + 500 + 5WAS) and T4 (metribuzin 150g + 500 + 6WAS) than in T1 (metribuzin 150g + 250 + 5WAS) in the first year”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–204 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Metribuzin 150g + 500 + 6WAS significantly reduced dry biomass of resistant Phalaris minor in the first year compared with metribuzin 150g + 250 + 5WAS.

Treatment
metribuzin 150g + 500 + 6WASe0
Interactor
Phalaris minorPhalaris minort0weed
Outcome
dry biomass of resistant Phalaris minore0
Direction
reducede0
Qualifier
first yeare0
Comparator
metribuzin 150g + 250 + 5WASe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Phalaris minor
Phalaris minor · Interactor · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryMatt Lavin from Bozeman, Montana, USA · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Optimization of Metribuzin use for Controlling Isoproturon-Resistant Phalaris minor Retz. in Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–98 · show in text ↑
e0

“The dry biomass of resistant Phalaris minor was significantly reduced in T2 (metribuzin 150g + 500 + 5WAS) and T4 (metribuzin 150g + 500 + 6WAS) than in T1 (metribuzin 150g + 250 + 5WAS) in the first year”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–204 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Metribuzin 200g + 500 + 5 WAS caused a drastic reduction in biomass of resistant Phalaris minor.

Treatment
metribuzin 200g + 500 + 5 WASe1
Interactor
P. minorPhalaris minore1weed
Outcome
resistant P. minor's biomasse1
Direction
reductione1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Phalaris minor
Phalaris minor · Interactor · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryMatt Lavin from Bozeman, Montana, USA · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Optimization of Metribuzin use for Controlling Isoproturon-Resistant Phalaris minor Retz. in Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–98 · show in text ↑
e1

“T6 (metribuzin 200g + 500 + 5 WAS) also caused a drastic reduction in resistant P. minor's biomass”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 280–378 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The maximum reduction in dry matter production of broad-leaved and total weeds was caused by an unresolved treatment T.

Outcome
dry matter production of the broad-leaved as well as of total (composite) weedse2
Direction
reductione2

Not reportedTreatmentComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Optimization of Metribuzin use for Controlling Isoproturon-Resistant Phalaris minor Retz. in Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–98 · show in text ↑
e2

“However, T caused maximum reduction in dry matter production of the broad-leaved as well as of total (composite) weeds and registered a significant increase in the number of ear-bearing tillers and grain yield of wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 380–598 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

The unresolved treatment T significantly increased the number of ear-bearing tillers and grain yield of wheat.

Outcome
number of ear-bearing tillers and grain yield of wheate2
Direction
increasee2

Not reportedTreatmentComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Optimization of Metribuzin use for Controlling Isoproturon-Resistant Phalaris minor Retz. in Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–98 · show in text ↑
e2

“However, T caused maximum reduction in dry matter production of the broad-leaved as well as of total (composite) weeds and registered a significant increase in the number of ear-bearing tillers and grain yield of wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 380–598 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

A higher nitrogen dose of 120kg N ha−1 significantly reduced the number of ear-bearing tillers of wheat compared with 60 kg N ha−1.

Treatment
120kg N ha−1e3
Outcome
number of ear-bearing tillerse3
Direction
reducede3
Comparator
60 kg N ha−1e3

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Optimization of Metribuzin use for Controlling Isoproturon-Resistant Phalaris minor Retz. in Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–98 · show in text ↑
e3

“The number of ear-bearing tillers was significantly reduced at the higher dose at 120kg N ha−1 than at the lower dose (60 kg N ha−1) and accordingly the wheat grain yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 600–770 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The higher nitrogen dose of 120kg N ha−1 accordingly reduced wheat grain yield compared with 60 kg N ha−1.

Treatment
120kg N ha−1e3
Outcome
wheat grain yielde3
Direction
decreaseinferrede3
Comparator
60 kg N ha−1e3

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Optimization of Metribuzin use for Controlling Isoproturon-Resistant Phalaris minor Retz. in Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–98 · show in text ↑
e3

“The number of ear-bearing tillers was significantly reduced at the higher dose at 120kg N ha−1 than at the lower dose (60 kg N ha−1) and accordingly the wheat grain yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 600–770 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

All metribuzin treatments significantly reduced the population and fresh biomass of resistant P. minor, wild oat and total weeds compared with the unweeded control.

Treatment
metribuzin treatmentse4
Interactor
resistant P. minore4weed
Second interactor
wild oate4weed
Outcome
population and fresh biomass accumulation of resistant P. minor, wild oat and total weedse4
Direction
reducede4
Comparator
T10 (unweeded control)e4

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Optimization of Metribuzin use for Controlling Isoproturon-Resistant Phalaris minor Retz. in Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–98 · show in text ↑
e4

“the population and fresh biomass accumulation of resistant P. minor, wild oat and total weeds were significantly reduced in all the metribuzin treatments compared to T10 (unweeded control)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 792–980 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

One hand weeding at 30 DAS significantly reduced fresh biomass of wild oat and total weeds compared with the others except T6 and T2.

Treatment
one hand weeding at 30 DASe6
Interactor
wild oate6weed
Outcome
fresh biomass of wild oat and total weedse6
Direction
reducede6
Comparator
otherse6

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Optimization of Metribuzin use for Controlling Isoproturon-Resistant Phalaris minor Retz. in Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–98 · show in text ↑
e6

“The fresh biomass of wild oat and total weeds were significantly reduced in T9 (one hand weeding at 30 DAS) than in others except T6 and T2”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1084–1223 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

T6 caused more reduction in fresh weight and height of wheat plants, and was more phytotoxic to wheat.

Treatment
T6e7
Outcome
fresh weight as well as height of wheat plantse7
Direction
more reductione7
Qualifier
more phytotoxic to wheat plantse7

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Optimization of Metribuzin use for Controlling Isoproturon-Resistant Phalaris minor Retz. in Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–98 · show in text ↑
e7

“T6 on the contrary caused more reduction in fresh weight as well as height of wheat plants and thus proved more phytotoxic to wheat plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1224–1362 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The higher dose and higher spray volume of metribuzin were more effective than lower levels in reducing resistant P minor, wild oat and total weeds.

Treatment
higher dose and higher spray volume of metribuzine1
Interactor
resistant P minore1weed
Outcome
population and fresh biomass accumulatione1
Direction
more effectivee1
Comparator
their respective lower levelse1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Optimization of Metribuzin use for Controlling Isoproturon-Resistant Phalaris minor Retz. in Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–98 · show in text ↑
e1

“The higher dose and higher spray volume of metribuzin were more effective in reducing the population and fresh biomass accumulation of resistant P minor wild oats as well as total weeds than their respective lower levels”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1364–1584 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The higher dose and higher spray volume of metribuzin caused more phytotoxicity to wheat.

Treatment
higher dose and higher spray volumee1
Outcome
phytotoxicitve1
Direction
moree1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Optimization of Metribuzin use for Controlling Isoproturon-Resistant Phalaris minor Retz. in Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–98 · show in text ↑
e1

“The higher dose and higher spray volume on the contrary brought more phytotoxicitv”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1585–1667 · show in text ↑

metribuzin · pest · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

5 papers: 3 positive, 2 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. positive

1 paper more in this group

See all 5 papers →

metribuzin · disease · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results agree

4 papers: 4 positive, 0 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
See all 4 papers →

metribuzin · Phalaris minor · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results agree

18 papers: 18 positive, 0 negative or no effect

17 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

14 papers more in this group

See all 18 papers →

application · crop injury · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

15 papers: 6 positive, 9 negative or no effect

8 papers in the same direction as this paper · 6 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

11 papers more in this group

See all 15 papers →

application · pest · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

43 papers: 39 positive, 4 negative or no effect

38 papers in the same direction as this paper · 4 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. negative

39 papers more in this group

See all 43 papers →

herbicide · weed · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

401 papers: 362 positive, 39 negative or no effect

361 papers in the same direction as this paper · 34 in the opposite direction · 5 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. no effect

397 papers more in this group

See all 401 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.