Intervention effectmodel-written summary

The higher dose and higher spray volume of metribuzin were more effective than lower levels in reducing resistant P minor, wild oat and total weeds.

A claim from Optimization of Metribuzin use for Controlling Isoproturon-Resistant Phalaris minor Retz. in Wheat · 2002

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The higher dose and higher spray volume of metribuzin were more effective than lower levels in reducing resistant P minor, wild oat and total weeds.

Treatment
higher dose and higher spray volume of metribuzine1
Interactor
resistant P minore1weed
Outcome
population and fresh biomass accumulatione1
Direction
more effectivee1
Comparator
their respective lower levelse1

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageSecond interactorSecond interactor roleSettingValueQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Optimization of Metribuzin use for Controlling Isoproturon-Resistant Phalaris minor Retz. in Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–98
e1

“The higher dose and higher spray volume of metribuzin were more effective in reducing the population and fresh biomass accumulation of resistant P minor wild oats as well as total weeds than their respective lower levels”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1364–1584

Title

Optimization of Metribuzin use for Controlling Isoproturon-Resistant Phalaris minor Retz. in Wheat

T. K. Das; N. T. Yaduraju Pesticide Research Journal 2002

Other claims from this paper (11)

Record rev-eccfaab8b068d275ad0ca16ea3c07f2ac3deae4865e3590b65c9c6d9b3a7cba9 · schema claims-v0.9 · position 12 in the model’s answer

metribuzin · pest · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

5 papers: 3 positive, 2 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this claim · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. positive
  4. positive
See all 5 papers →

application · pest · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

43 papers: 39 positive, 4 negative or no effect

38 papers in the same direction as this claim · 4 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. negative
  4. negative
  5. positive
  6. positive
  7. positive
  8. positive

34 papers more in this group

See all 43 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.