Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Aerial sprays reduced numbers of wheat midge larvae more effectively than they reduced the incidence of midge-damaged kernels.

A claim from FACTORS INFLUENCING THE EFFICACY AND ECONOMIC RETURNS OF AERIAL SPRAYS AGAINST THE WHEAT MIDGE, SITODIPLOSIS MOSELLANA (GÉHIN) (DIPTERA: CECIDOMYIIDAE) · 1988

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Aerial sprays reduced numbers of wheat midge larvae more effectively than they reduced the incidence of midge-damaged kernels.

Treatment
aerial sprayse0
Interactor
wheat midgee0pest
Outcome
numbers of midge larvaee1
Direction
more effectivee1
Comparator
reducing the incidence of midge-damaged kernelse1

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageSecond interactorSecond interactor roleSettingValueQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Evaluations of individually collected wheat heads and whole plants indicated that several factors may influence the efficacy of aerial sprays against the wheat midge”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 9–174
e1

“In head and plant samples, sprays were more effective at reducing numbers of midge larvae than reducing the incidence of midge-damaged kernels”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 612–754

Title

FACTORS INFLUENCING THE EFFICACY AND ECONOMIC RETURNS OF AERIAL SPRAYS AGAINST THE WHEAT MIDGE, SITODIPLOSIS MOSELLANA (GÉHIN) (DIPTERA: CECIDOMYIIDAE)

R.H. Elliott The Canadian Entomologist 1988. doi:10.4039/ent120941-11

Other claims from this paper (13)

Record rev-cff3b265d2aebf77525d592192133fae24dd011b42090d7213efd2fd66a638a3 · schema claims-v0.9 · position 1 in the model’s answer

application · pest · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

43 papers: 39 positive, 4 negative or no effect

38 papers in the same direction as this claim · 4 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. negative
  4. negative
  5. positive
  6. positive
  7. positive
  8. positive

34 papers more in this group

See all 43 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.