Paper · 2021 · Frontiers in Nutrition

Microbial-Assisted Wheat Iron Biofortification Using Endophytic Bacillus altitudinis WR10

Zhongke Sun; Zonghao Yue; Hongzhan Liu; et al.

11
claims
30
verbatim quotes
40
citations
3
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

Microbial-assisted biofortification attracted much attention recently due to its sustainable and eco-friendly nature for improving nutrient content in wheat. An endophytic strain Bacillus altitudinis WR10, which showed sophistical regulation of iron (Fe) homeostasis in wheat seedlings, inspired us to test its potential for enhancing Fe biofortification in wheat grain. In this study, assays in vitro indicated that WR10 has versatile plant growth-promoting (PGP) traits and bioinformatic analysis predicted its non-pathogenicity. Two inoculation methods, namely, seed soaking and soil spraying, with 10 7 cfu/ml WR10 cells were applied once before sowing of wheat ( Triticum aestivum L. cv. Zhoumai 36) in the field. After wheat maturation, evaluation of yield and nutrients showed a significant increase in the mean number of kernels per spike (KPS) and the content of total nitrogen (N), potassium (K), and Fe in grains. At the grain filling stage, the abundance of Bacillus spp. and the content of N, K, and Fe in the root, the stem, and the leaf were also increased in nearly all tissues, except Fe in the stem and the leaf. Further correlation analysis revealed a positive relationship between the total abundance of Bacillus spp. and the content of N, K, and Fe in grains. Seed staining confirmed the enhanced accumulation of Fe, especially in the embryo and the endosperm. Finally, using a hydroponic coculture model, qPCR quantification indicated effective colonization, internalization, translocation, and replication of strain WR10 in wheat within 48 h. Collectively, strain WR10 assisted successful Fe biofortification in wheat in the field, laying a foundation for further large-scale investigation of its applicability and effectiveness.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 11

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Seed soaking and soil spraying with WR10 significantly increased the mean number of kernels per spike.

Material
Zhoumai 36e2
Treatment
seed soaking and soil sprayinge1
Interactor
Bacillus altitudinis WR10Bacillus altitudinise3symbiont
Outcome
mean number of kernels per spikee0
Direction
increasee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Wheat Iron Biofortification”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 19–46 · show in text ↑
e0

“significant increase in the mean number of kernels per spike (KPS) and the content of total nitrogen (N), potassium (K), and Fe in grains”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 786–923 · show in text ↑
e1

“Two inoculation methods, namely, seed soaking and soil spraying”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 532–595 · show in text ↑
e2

“Triticum aestivum L. cv. Zhoumai 36”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 668–703 · show in text ↑
e3

“Bacillus altitudinis WR10”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 179–204 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Seed soaking and soil spraying with WR10 significantly increased total N, K and Fe content in grains.

Material
Zhoumai 36e2
Organ / stage
grainse0
Treatment
seed soaking and soil sprayinge1
Interactor
Bacillus altitudinis WR10Bacillus altitudinise3symbiont
Outcome
the content of total nitrogen (N), potassium (K), and Fee0
Direction
increasee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Wheat Iron Biofortification”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 19–46 · show in text ↑
e0

“significant increase in the mean number of kernels per spike (KPS) and the content of total nitrogen (N), potassium (K), and Fe in grains”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 786–923 · show in text ↑
e1

“Two inoculation methods, namely, seed soaking and soil spraying”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 532–595 · show in text ↑
e2

“Triticum aestivum L. cv. Zhoumai 36”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 668–703 · show in text ↑
e3

“Bacillus altitudinis WR10”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 179–204 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

N, K and Fe content in root, stem and leaf increased in nearly all tissues at the grain filling stage, except Fe in stem and leaf.

Organ / stage
the root, the stem, and the leafe0
Treatment
seed soaking and soil sprayinge1
Interactor
Bacillus altitudinis WR10Bacillus altitudinise2symbiont
Outcome
the content of N, K, and Fee0
Direction
increasede0
Qualifier
except Fe in the stem and the leafe0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Wheat Iron Biofortification”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 19–46 · show in text ↑
e0

“At the grain filling stage, the abundance of Bacillus spp. and the content of N, K, and Fe in the root, the stem, and the leaf were also increased in nearly all tissues, except Fe in the stem and the leaf”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 925–1129 · show in text ↑
e1

“Two inoculation methods, namely, seed soaking and soil spraying”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 532–595 · show in text ↑
e2

“Bacillus altitudinis WR10”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 179–204 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Abundance of Bacillus spp. increased in the grain filling stage after WR10 application.

Organ / stage
grain filling stagee0
Treatment
seed soaking and soil sprayinge1
Interactor
Bacillus spp.e0symbiont
Outcome
abundance of Bacillus spp.e0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Wheat Iron Biofortification”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 19–46 · show in text ↑
e0

“At the grain filling stage, the abundance of Bacillus spp. and the content of N, K, and Fe in the root, the stem, and the leaf were also increased in nearly all tissues, except Fe in the stem and the leaf”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 925–1129 · show in text ↑
e1

“Two inoculation methods, namely, seed soaking and soil spraying”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 532–595 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Total abundance of Bacillus spp. is positively related to N, K and Fe content in grains.

Interactor
Bacillus spp.e0symbiont
Outcome
content of N, K, and Fe in grainse0
Direction
increaseinferrede0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Wheat Iron Biofortification”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 19–46 · show in text ↑
e0

“a positive relationship between the total abundance of Bacillus spp. and the content of N, K, and Fe in grains”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1169–1279 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Seed staining showed enhanced Fe accumulation in the embryo and the endosperm.

Organ / stage
embryo and the endosperme0
Outcome
accumulation of Fee0
Direction
enhancede0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Wheat Iron Biofortification”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 19–46 · show in text ↑
e0

“Seed staining confirmed the enhanced accumulation of Fe, especially in the embryo and the endosperm”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1281–1380 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Strain WR10 effectively colonized, internalized and translocated in wheat within 48 h in a hydroponic coculture.

Interactor
strain WR10e0symbiont
Outcome
colonization, internalization, translocatione0
Qualifier
within 48 he0
Setting
hydroponic coculture modele1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“effective colonization, internalization, translocation, and replication of strain WR10 in wheat within 48 h”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1457–1564 · show in text ↑
e1

“using a hydroponic coculture model”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1391–1425 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Strain WR10 replicated in wheat within 48 h in a hydroponic coculture.

Interactor
strain WR10e0symbiont
Outcome
replicatione0
Qualifier
within 48 he0
Setting
hydroponic coculture modele1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“effective colonization, internalization, translocation, and replication of strain WR10 in wheat within 48 h”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1457–1564 · show in text ↑
e1

“using a hydroponic coculture model”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1391–1425 · show in text ↑
Observationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Strain WR10 assisted successful Fe biofortification of wheat in the field.

Interactor
strain WR10e0symbiont
Outcome
Fe biofortificatione0
Setting
in the fielde0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“strain WR10 assisted successful Fe biofortification in wheat in the field”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1580–1653 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

In vitro assays indicated that WR10 has versatile plant growth-promoting traits.

Interactor
WR10e0symbiont
Outcome
plant growth-promoting (PGP) traitse0
Setting
in vitroe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Wheat Iron Biofortification”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 19–46 · show in text ↑
e0

“assays in vitro indicated that WR10 has versatile plant growth-promoting (PGP) traits”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 386–471 · show in text ↑
Observationauthor interpretationoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Bioinformatic analysis predicted that WR10 is non-pathogenic.

Outcome
non-pathogenicitye0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Wheat Iron Biofortification”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 19–46 · show in text ↑
e0

“bioinformatic analysis predicted its non-pathogenicity”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 476–530 · show in text ↑

seed treatment · pest · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

35 papers: 29 positive, 6 negative or no effect

28 papers in the same direction as this paper · 6 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

31 papers more in this group

See all 35 papers →

application · pest · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

43 papers: 39 positive, 4 negative or no effect

38 papers in the same direction as this paper · 4 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. negative

39 papers more in this group

See all 43 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.