Paper · 2001 · Indian Journal of Agronomy

Evaluation of sulfosulfuron and metribuzin for weed control in irrigated wheat (Triticum aestivum)

A.K. PANDEY; K.A. GOPINATH; H.S. GUPTA

10
claims
20
verbatim quotes
18
citations
3
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

A field experiment was carried out on sandy clay-loam soil in North-western Himalayas of India and the ex- perimental field had enough weed population. An average decrease in grain yield by 29% was observed due to season-long weed-crop competition. The best weed-control efficiency (85.7-93.8%) was achieved with metribuzin compared to other herbicides, i.e. Sulfosulfuron, isoproturon and 2, 4-D (55.4-87.5%). Earlier timing of metribuzin application (40 days stage) provided excellent control of Phalaris minor (Ftetz.) Pers., while control of Polygonum plebeium R.Br. and Melilotus indica All. was better with application at 60 days stage. Sulfosulfuron showed high activity against all weed species except I? plebeium and at equivalent doses, control was greater at the earlier timing of application. Slight crop injury in terms of yellowing of leaves and stunted growth was ob- served in the plots treated with sulfosulfuron. It was more pronounced under delayed application of the herbi- cide. The injury, however, disappeared with the advancement of crop growth. All the treatments except 2.4-D ap- plication gave significantly higher grain yield compared to weeded check. The highest grain yield was recorded in manual weeding treatment. Lower doses of sulfosulfuron (20 to 25 g/ha) and metribuzin (230 to 245 glha) both applied at 40 days stage gave yields similar to manual weeding treatment.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 10

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Season-long weed competition decreased grain yield by 29%.

Treatment
season-long weed-crop competitione0
Outcome
grain yielde0
Direction
decreasee0
Value
29%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“An average decrease in grain yield by 29% was observed due to season-long weed-crop competition”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 152–247 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat (Triticum aestivum)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 73–98 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Metribuzin produced the best weed-control efficiency of 85.7-93.8% relative to the other listed herbicides.

Treatment
metribuzine0
Outcome
weed-control efficiencye0
Direction
beste0
Value
85.7-93.8%e0
Comparator
other herbicidese0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The best weed-control efficiency (85.7-93.8%) was achieved with metribuzin compared to other herbicides, i.e. Sulfosulfuron, isoproturon and 2, 4-D (55.4-87.5%)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 249–409 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat (Triticum aestivum)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 73–98 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Metribuzin at 40 days controlled Phalaris minor.

Treatment
metribuzin application (40 days stage)e0
Interactor
Phalaris minorPhalaris minore0weed
Outcome
control of Phalaris minore0
Direction
excellente0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Phalaris minor
Phalaris minor · Interactor · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryMatt Lavin from Bozeman, Montana, USA · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Earlier timing of metribuzin application (40 days stage) provided excellent control of Phalaris minor (Ftetz.) Pers.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 411–527 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat (Triticum aestivum)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 73–98 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Metribuzin at 60 days better controlled Polygonum plebeium and Melilotus indica.

Treatment
application at 60 days stagee0
Interactor
Polygonum plebeiumPolygonum plebeiume0weed
Second interactor
Melilotus indicaMelilotus indicuse0weed
Outcome
control of Polygonum plebeium R.Br. and Melilotus indica All.e0
Direction
bettere0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Polygonum plebeium
Polygonum plebeium · InteractorJ.M.Garg · CC BY 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Melilotus indicus
Melilotus indicus · Second interactorZeynel Cebeci · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“control of Polygonum plebeium R.Br. and Melilotus indica All. was better with application at 60 days stage”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 535–641 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat (Triticum aestivum)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 73–98 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Sulfosulfuron showed high activity against weed species except I? plebeium.

Treatment
Sulfosulfurone0
Interactor
I? plebeiume0weed
Outcome
high activity against all weed species except I? plebeiume0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Sulfosulfuron showed high activity against all weed species except I? plebeium”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 643–721 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat (Triticum aestivum)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 73–98 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Earlier sulfosulfuron application gave greater weed control at equivalent doses.

Treatment
earlier timing of applicatione0
Outcome
controle0
Direction
greatere0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“at equivalent doses, control was greater at the earlier timing of application”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 726–803 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat (Triticum aestivum)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 73–98 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Sulfosulfuron caused transient leaf yellowing and stunted growth, stronger with delayed application.

Treatment
sulfosulfurone0
Outcome
yellowing of leaves and stunted growthe0
Direction
more pronouncede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Slight crop injury in terms of yellowing of leaves and stunted growth was ob- served in the plots treated with sulfosulfuron. It was more pronounced under delayed application of the herbi- cide. The injury, however, disappeared with the advancement of crop growth”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 805–1068 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat (Triticum aestivum)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 73–98 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

All treatments except 2.4-D yielded significantly more grain than the weeded check.

Treatment
All the treatments except 2.4-D ap- plicatione0
Outcome
grain yielde0
Direction
highere0
Comparator
weeded checke0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“All the treatments except 2.4-D ap- plication gave significantly higher grain yield compared to weeded check”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1070–1178 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat (Triticum aestivum)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 73–98 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Manual weeding gave the highest grain yield.

Treatment
manual weeding treatmente0
Outcome
grain yielde0
Direction
higheste0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The highest grain yield was recorded in manual weeding treatment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1180–1244 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat (Triticum aestivum)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 73–98 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Low sulfosulfuron and metribuzin doses at 40 days gave yields similar to manual weeding.

Treatment
Lower doses of sulfosulfuron (20 to 25 g/ha) and metribuzin (230 to 245 glha) both applied at 40 days stagee0
Outcome
yieldse0
Direction
similare0
Comparator
manual weeding treatmente0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Lower doses of sulfosulfuron (20 to 25 g/ha) and metribuzin (230 to 245 glha) both applied at 40 days stage gave yields similar to manual weeding treatment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1246–1401 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat (Triticum aestivum)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 73–98 · show in text ↑

metribuzin · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results differ

75 papers: 45 positive, 30 negative or no effect

29 papers in the same direction as this paper · 45 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. no effect
  3. negative

71 papers more in this group

See all 75 papers →

metribuzin · weed · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

63 papers: 60 positive, 3 negative or no effect

59 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

59 papers more in this group

See all 63 papers →

metribuzin · Phalaris minor · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results agree

18 papers: 18 positive, 0 negative or no effect

17 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

14 papers more in this group

See all 18 papers →

competition · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results differ

35 papers: 3 positive, 32 negative or no effect

31 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. positive

31 papers more in this group

See all 35 papers →

climate site · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

154 papers: 72 positive, 82 negative or no effect

81 papers in the same direction as this paper · 72 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. positive

150 papers more in this group

See all 154 papers →

herbicide · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

563 papers: 466 positive, 97 negative or no effect

465 papers in the same direction as this paper · 87 in the opposite direction · 10 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive

559 papers more in this group

See all 563 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.