Paper · 2013 · Indian Journal of Weed Science

Effect of new herbicides on growth and yield of wheat

V.B. Paighan; A. K. Gore; A. S. Chavan

7
claims
14
verbatim quotes
8
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

An average decrease in grain yield by 15.42% was observed due to season-long weed-crop competition. Lowest monocot and dicot weeds were observed with weed free treatment. The best weed control efficiency in case of monocot (90.8%) and dicot (82.8%) was achieved with metsulfuron-methyl and metribuzin, respectively compared to other herbicides namely pendimethalin, carfentrazone, fenoxaprop and 2,4-D. All the treatments except fenoxaprop, carfentrazone, 2,4-D and mixture of metribuzin and fenoxaprop application gave significantly higher grain yield compared to weedy check. However, higher additional net return (`31,359) was obtained with metsulfuron-methyl followed by metribuzin (` 30,907).

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 7

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Season-long weed competition reduced wheat grain yield by 15.42%.

Treatment
season-long weed-crop competitione0
Outcome
grain yielde0
Direction
decreasee0
Value
15.42%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 48–53 · show in text ↑
e0

“An average decrease in grain yield by 15.42% was observed due to season-long weed-crop competition”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–98 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Weed-free treatment produced the lowest monocot and dicot weed levels.

Treatment
weed free treatmente0
Outcome
monocot and dicot weedse0
Direction
Loweste0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 48–53 · show in text ↑
e0

“Lowest monocot and dicot weeds were observed with weed free treatment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 100–169 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Metsulfuron-methyl achieved 90.8% monocot weed control efficiency, best among the herbicides.

Treatment
metsulfuron-methyle0
Outcome
weed control efficiency in case of monocote0
Direction
beste0
Value
90.8%e0
Comparator
other herbicidese0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 48–53 · show in text ↑
e0

“The best weed control efficiency in case of monocot (90.8%) and dicot (82.8%) was achieved with metsulfuron-methyl and metribuzin, respectively compared to other herbicides namely pendimethalin, carfentrazone, fenoxaprop and 2,4-D”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 171–401 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Metribuzin achieved 82.8% dicot weed control efficiency, best among the herbicides.

Treatment
metribuzine0
Outcome
weed control efficiency in case of monocot (90.8%) and dicote0
Direction
beste0
Value
82.8%e0
Comparator
other herbicidese0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 48–53 · show in text ↑
e0

“The best weed control efficiency in case of monocot (90.8%) and dicot (82.8%) was achieved with metsulfuron-methyl and metribuzin, respectively compared to other herbicides namely pendimethalin, carfentrazone, fenoxaprop and 2,4-D”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 171–401 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Most herbicide treatments raised grain yield relative to the weedy check; the named exceptions did not.

Treatment
All the treatments except fenoxaprop, carfentrazone, 2,4-D and mixture of metribuzin and fenoxaprop applicatione0
Outcome
grain yielde0
Direction
highere0
Comparator
weedy checke0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 48–53 · show in text ↑
e0

“All the treatments except fenoxaprop, carfentrazone, 2,4-D and mixture of metribuzin and fenoxaprop application gave significantly higher grain yield compared to weedy check”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 403–576 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Metsulfuron-methyl produced the higher additional net return of `31,359.

Treatment
metsulfuron-methyle0
Outcome
additional net returne0
Direction
highere0
Value
`31,359e0
Comparator
metribuzine0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 48–53 · show in text ↑
e0

“higher additional net return (`31,359) was obtained with metsulfuron-methyl followed by metribuzin (` 30,907)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 587–696 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Metribuzin produced an additional net return of ` 30,907, below metsulfuron-methyl.

Treatment
metribuzine0
Outcome
additional net returne0
Direction
followed bye0
Value
` 30,907e0
Comparator
metsulfuron-methyle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 48–53 · show in text ↑
e0

“higher additional net return (`31,359) was obtained with metsulfuron-methyl followed by metribuzin (` 30,907)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 587–696 · show in text ↑

metribuzin · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results differ

75 papers: 45 positive, 30 negative or no effect

44 papers in the same direction as this paper · 27 in the opposite direction · 3 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. negative

71 papers more in this group

See all 75 papers →

2,4-D · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results differ

116 papers: 78 positive, 38 negative or no effect

77 papers in the same direction as this paper · 34 in the opposite direction · 4 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. negative

112 papers more in this group

See all 116 papers →

carfentrazone · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

26 papers: 25 positive, 1 negative or no effect

24 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive
    The tank mixture increased wheat seed yield over the listed other treatments.

    Bioefficacy of Fenoxaprop, Clodinafop, Metribuzin Alone and in Combination Against Weeds in Wheatand their Residual Effect on Succeeding Crops · 2005 · compared with sole application of clodinafop and fenoxaprop, tank mix of metribuzin and isoproturon with carfentrazone and metsulfuron

    Same direction

22 papers more in this group

See all 26 papers →

metribuzin · weed · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

63 papers: 60 positive, 3 negative or no effect

59 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. negative
  3. no effect

59 papers more in this group

See all 63 papers →

metsulfuron methyl · weed · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

134 papers: 132 positive, 2 negative or no effect

131 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. negative

130 papers more in this group

See all 134 papers →

metsulfuron methyl · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

155 papers: 143 positive, 12 negative or no effect

142 papers in the same direction as this paper · 7 in the opposite direction · 5 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. negative

151 papers more in this group

See all 155 papers →

competition · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results differ

35 papers: 3 positive, 32 negative or no effect

31 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. positive

31 papers more in this group

See all 35 papers →

climate site · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

154 papers: 72 positive, 82 negative or no effect

81 papers in the same direction as this paper · 72 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. positive

150 papers more in this group

See all 154 papers →

8 of 9 groups shown: named compounds and organisms first, then groups whose results differ (checked claim by claim), then those with positive and negative results, then the smaller groups.

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.