Paper · 2005 · Indian Journal of Weed Science

Bioefficacy of Fenoxaprop, Clodinafop, Metribuzin Alone and in Combination Against Weeds in Wheatand their Residual Effect on Succeeding Crops

Nisha Chopra; Nisha Chopra

8
claims
12
verbatim quotes
13
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Clodinafop and fenoxaprop alone could successfully control Phalaris minor but were found ineffective against Rumex marilimus, Melilotus indica and Coronopus dydilllus. Tank mixture of c1odinafop (60 g ha-1) and fenoxaprop (100 g ha−1) with carfentrazone (20 g ha−1) controlled both grassy and broadleaf weeds resulting in 88–90% weed control efficiency and significantly increased seed yield of wheat over sole application of clodinafop and fenoxaprop, tank mix of metribuzin and isoproturon with carfentrazone and metsulfuron. Metribuzin sole as well as in tank mix with carfentrazone and metsulfuron was not found suitable due to its toxicity to wheat. The succeeding crops of moongbean, cowpeas and forage sorghum did not show any residual activity of herbicides applied in wheat.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 8

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Clodinafop controlled Phalaris minor.

Taxon
Wheatandt0
Treatment
Clodinafope0
Interactor
Phalaris minorPhalaris minore0weed
Outcome
control Phalaris minore0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Phalaris minor
Phalaris minor · Interactor · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryMatt Lavin from Bozeman, Montana, USA · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Clodinafop and fenoxaprop alone could successfully control Phalaris minor”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–73 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheatand”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 92–100 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Fenoxaprop controlled Phalaris minor.

Taxon
Wheatandt0
Treatment
fenoxaprope0
Interactor
Phalaris minorPhalaris minore0weed
Outcome
control Phalaris minore0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Phalaris minor
Phalaris minor · Interactor · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryMatt Lavin from Bozeman, Montana, USA · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Clodinafop and fenoxaprop alone could successfully control Phalaris minor”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–73 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheatand”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 92–100 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The two sole herbicides were ineffective against three broadleaf weeds.

Taxon
Wheatandt0
Interactor
Rumex marilimuse0weed
Second interactor
Melilotus indicaMelilotus indicuse0weed
Outcome
ineffective against Rumex marilimus, Melilotus indica and Coronopus dydillluse0
Qualifier
Coronopus dydillluse0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Melilotus indicus
Melilotus indicus · Second interactorZeynel Cebeci · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“but were found ineffective against Rumex marilimus, Melilotus indica and Coronopus dydilllus.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 74–167 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheatand”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 92–100 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The tank mixtures controlled grassy and broadleaf weeds with 88–90% efficiency.

Taxon
Wheatandt0
Treatment
Tank mixture of c1odinafop (60 g ha-1) and fenoxaprop (100 g ha−1) with carfentrazone (20 g ha−1)e0
Outcome
weed control efficiencye0
Value
88–90%e0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Verbatim

e0

“Tank mixture of c1odinafop (60 g ha-1) and fenoxaprop (100 g ha−1) with carfentrazone (20 g ha−1) controlled both grassy and broadleaf weeds resulting in 88–90% weed control efficiency”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 168–352 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheatand”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 92–100 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

The tank mixture increased wheat seed yield over the listed other treatments.

Treatment
Tank mixture of c1odinafop (60 g ha-1) and fenoxaprop (100 g ha−1) with carfentrazone (20 g ha−1)e0
Outcome
seed yield of wheate0
Direction
increasede0
Comparator
sole application of clodinafop and fenoxaprop, tank mix of metribuzin and isoproturon with carfentrazone and metsulfurone0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Tank mixture of c1odinafop (60 g ha-1) and fenoxaprop (100 g ha−1) with carfentrazone (20 g ha−1) controlled both grassy and broadleaf weeds resulting in 88–90% weed control efficiency and significantly increased seed yield of wheat over sole application of clodinafop and fenoxaprop, tank mix of metribuzin and isoproturon with carfentrazone and metsulfuron.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 168–527 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Metribuzin alone was toxic to wheat.

Treatment
Metribuzin solee0
Outcome
toxicity to wheate0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Metribuzin sole as well as in tank mix with carfentrazone and metsulfuron was not found suitable due to its toxicity to wheat.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 528–654 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Metribuzin mixtures were toxic to wheat.

Treatment
tank mix with carfentrazone and metsulfurone0
Outcome
toxicity to wheate0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Metribuzin sole as well as in tank mix with carfentrazone and metsulfuron was not found suitable due to its toxicity to wheat.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 528–654 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Succeeding moongbean, cowpeas and forage sorghum showed no residual herbicide activity.

Taxon
moongbeane0
Outcome
did not show any residual activity of herbicides applied in wheate0

Not reportedDirection

Verbatim

e0

“The succeeding crops of moongbean, cowpeas and forage sorghum did not show any residual activity of herbicides applied in wheat.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 655–783 · show in text ↑

carfentrazone · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

26 papers: 25 positive, 1 negative or no effect

24 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive

22 papers more in this group

See all 26 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.