Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Metribuzin produced the best weed-control efficiency of 85.7-93.8% relative to the other listed herbicides.

A claim from Evaluation of sulfosulfuron and metribuzin for weed control in irrigated wheat (Triticum aestivum) · 2001

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Metribuzin produced the best weed-control efficiency of 85.7-93.8% relative to the other listed herbicides.

Treatment
metribuzine0
Outcome
weed-control efficiencye0
Direction
beste0
Value
85.7-93.8%e0
Comparator
other herbicidese0

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleSettingQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The best weed-control efficiency (85.7-93.8%) was achieved with metribuzin compared to other herbicides, i.e. Sulfosulfuron, isoproturon and 2, 4-D (55.4-87.5%)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 249–409
t0

“wheat (Triticum aestivum)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 73–98

Title

Evaluation of sulfosulfuron and metribuzin for weed control in irrigated wheat (Triticum aestivum)

A.K. PANDEY; K.A. GOPINATH; H.S. GUPTA Indian Journal of Agronomy 2001. doi:10.59797/ija.v51i2.4990

Other claims from this paper (9)

Record rev-e9f7251841f1a3d973cf8200bb3f088f76b16d05bf9657bd726b07b20751956b · schema claims-v0.9 · position 2 in the model’s answer

metribuzin · weed · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

63 papers: 60 positive, 3 negative or no effect

59 papers in the same direction as this claim · 3 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
  4. positive
  5. negative
  6. no effect
  7. negative
  8. positive

54 papers more in this group

See all 63 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.