Paper · 2022 · Pesquisa Agropecuária Tropical

Agronomic performance of wheat under post-emergence herbicide application

Miguel Colombo; Leandro Paiola Albrecht; Alfredo Junior Paiola Albrecht; et al.

16
claims
17
verbatim quotes
6
citations
1
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

ABSTRACT In addition to the herbicides already registered for the wheat crop, others may be selective, such as saflufenacil, atrazine, mesotrione and triclopyr. This study aimed to assess the selectivity of herbicides via crop yield analysis, alone and in mixtures, applied to wheat in post-emergence, at the end of tillering. Two experiments were conducted using a randomized blocks design. The first experiment (E1) involved 13 and the second one (E2) 7 treatments, consisting of the application of 2,4-D, diclofop, iodosulfuron, clodinafop, saflufenacil, pyroxsulam, atrazine, mesotrione and triclopyr, alone or in mixtures. Wheat injury symptoms, plant height, number of spikelets per plant, number of grains per spikelet, 1,000-grain weight and yield were assessed. The application of diclofop and iodosulfuron was selective to the wheat, maintaining yield even under the water stress conditions observed in E1. Under the same conditions, applying 2,4-D, clodinafop, saflufenacil, pyroxsulam, atrazine/mesotrione, triclopyr or saflufenacil + atrazine/mesotrione reduced the wheat yield, with different injury levels. Under greater water availability (E2), 2,4-D, clodinafop, saflufenacil, pyroxsulam and triclopyr were selective to the wheat, with no negative effect on yield. The application of atrazine/mesotrione showed a high injury potential for the crop and reduced the wheat yield.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 16

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Diclofop maintained wheat yield under water stress.

Treatment
diclofope0
Outcome
yielde0
Direction
maintaininge0
Qualifier
water stress conditionse0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The application of diclofop and iodosulfuron was selective to the wheat, maintaining yield even under the water stress conditions observed in E1”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 771–915 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Iodosulfuron maintained wheat yield under water stress.

Treatment
iodosulfurone0
Outcome
yielde0
Direction
maintaininge0
Qualifier
water stress conditionse0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The application of diclofop and iodosulfuron was selective to the wheat, maintaining yield even under the water stress conditions observed in E1”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 771–915 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

2,4-D reduced wheat yield under water stress.

Treatment
2,4-De0
Outcome
yielde0
Direction
reducede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Under the same conditions, applying 2,4-D, clodinafop, saflufenacil, pyroxsulam, atrazine/mesotrione, triclopyr or saflufenacil + atrazine/mesotrione reduced the wheat yield, with different injury levels”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 917–1120 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Clodinafop reduced wheat yield under water stress.

Treatment
clodinafope0
Outcome
yielde0
Direction
reducede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Under the same conditions, applying 2,4-D, clodinafop, saflufenacil, pyroxsulam, atrazine/mesotrione, triclopyr or saflufenacil + atrazine/mesotrione reduced the wheat yield, with different injury levels”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 917–1120 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Saflufenacil reduced wheat yield under water stress.

Treatment
saflufenacile0
Outcome
yielde0
Direction
reducede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Under the same conditions, applying 2,4-D, clodinafop, saflufenacil, pyroxsulam, atrazine/mesotrione, triclopyr or saflufenacil + atrazine/mesotrione reduced the wheat yield, with different injury levels”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 917–1120 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Pyroxsulam reduced wheat yield under water stress.

Treatment
pyroxsulame0
Outcome
yielde0
Direction
reducede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Under the same conditions, applying 2,4-D, clodinafop, saflufenacil, pyroxsulam, atrazine/mesotrione, triclopyr or saflufenacil + atrazine/mesotrione reduced the wheat yield, with different injury levels”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 917–1120 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Atrazine/mesotrione reduced wheat yield under water stress.

Treatment
atrazine/mesotrionee0
Outcome
yielde0
Direction
reducede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Under the same conditions, applying 2,4-D, clodinafop, saflufenacil, pyroxsulam, atrazine/mesotrione, triclopyr or saflufenacil + atrazine/mesotrione reduced the wheat yield, with different injury levels”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 917–1120 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Triclopyr reduced wheat yield under water stress.

Treatment
triclopyre0
Outcome
yielde0
Direction
reducede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Under the same conditions, applying 2,4-D, clodinafop, saflufenacil, pyroxsulam, atrazine/mesotrione, triclopyr or saflufenacil + atrazine/mesotrione reduced the wheat yield, with different injury levels”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 917–1120 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Saflufenacil plus atrazine/mesotrione reduced wheat yield under water stress.

Treatment
saflufenacil + atrazine/mesotrionee0
Outcome
yielde0
Direction
reducede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Under the same conditions, applying 2,4-D, clodinafop, saflufenacil, pyroxsulam, atrazine/mesotrione, triclopyr or saflufenacil + atrazine/mesotrione reduced the wheat yield, with different injury levels”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 917–1120 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

2,4-D had no negative effect on wheat yield with greater water availability.

Treatment
2,4-De0
Outcome
yielde0
Direction
no negative effecte0
Qualifier
greater water availabilitye0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Under greater water availability (E2), 2,4-D, clodinafop, saflufenacil, pyroxsulam and triclopyr were selective to the wheat, with no negative effect on yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1122–1280 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Clodinafop had no negative effect on wheat yield with greater water availability.

Treatment
clodinafope0
Outcome
yielde0
Direction
no negative effecte0
Qualifier
greater water availabilitye0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Under greater water availability (E2), 2,4-D, clodinafop, saflufenacil, pyroxsulam and triclopyr were selective to the wheat, with no negative effect on yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1122–1280 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Saflufenacil had no negative effect on wheat yield with greater water availability.

Treatment
saflufenacile0
Outcome
yielde0
Direction
no negative effecte0
Qualifier
greater water availabilitye0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Under greater water availability (E2), 2,4-D, clodinafop, saflufenacil, pyroxsulam and triclopyr were selective to the wheat, with no negative effect on yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1122–1280 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Pyroxsulam had no negative effect on wheat yield with greater water availability.

Treatment
pyroxsulame0
Outcome
yielde0
Direction
no negative effecte0
Qualifier
greater water availabilitye0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Under greater water availability (E2), 2,4-D, clodinafop, saflufenacil, pyroxsulam and triclopyr were selective to the wheat, with no negative effect on yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1122–1280 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Triclopyr had no negative effect on wheat yield with greater water availability.

Treatment
triclopyre0
Outcome
yielde0
Direction
no negative effecte0
Qualifier
greater water availabilitye0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Under greater water availability (E2), 2,4-D, clodinafop, saflufenacil, pyroxsulam and triclopyr were selective to the wheat, with no negative effect on yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1122–1280 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Atrazine/mesotrione showed high wheat injury potential.

Treatment
atrazine/mesotrionee0
Outcome
injury potentiale0
Direction
highe0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The application of atrazine/mesotrione showed a high injury potential for the crop and reduced the wheat yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1282–1392 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 25–30 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Atrazine/mesotrione reduced wheat yield.

Treatment
atrazine/mesotrionee0
Outcome
yielde0
Direction
reducede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The application of atrazine/mesotrione showed a high injury potential for the crop and reduced the wheat yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1282–1392 · show in text ↑

diclofop · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results differ

8 papers: 6 positive, 2 negative or no effect

5 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. positive

4 papers more in this group

See all 8 papers →

atrazine · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results differ

16 papers: 11 positive, 5 negative or no effect

4 papers in the same direction as this paper · 11 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

12 papers more in this group

See all 16 papers →

2,4-D · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results differ

116 papers: 78 positive, 38 negative or no effect

37 papers in the same direction as this paper · 78 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. positive

112 papers more in this group

See all 116 papers →

mesotrione · crop injury · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect

1 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

clodinafop · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

60 papers: 57 positive, 3 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper · 57 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

56 papers more in this group

See all 60 papers →

saflufenacil · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results agree

3 papers: 0 positive, 3 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. no effect
  2. negative
See all 3 papers →

atrazine · crop injury · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results agree

4 papers: 0 positive, 4 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative
See all 4 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.