Paper · 2022 · Arquivos do Instituto Biológico

Does doses and time of 2,4-D application interfere in the physiology and wheat grains yield components?

Vinícius Soligo; Leandro Galon; César Tiago Forte; et al.

7
claims
11
verbatim quotes
2
citations
3
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

The identification of the application stage and correct dose of 2,4-dichlorophenoxyacetic acid (2,4-D) herbicide is important so that wheat is not harmed. In view of this, the objective of this study was to evaluate the effect of 2,4-D doses applied at different development stages of wheat crop. The experiment was conducted in a randomized block design, arranged in a 4 × 5 factorial scheme, with four replications. In factor A, the application stages (before tillering, tillering, first node and booting) were allocated and the doses of 2,4-D (0, 349, 698, 1047 and 1396 g.ha–1) were allocated in factor B. The variables evaluated were phytotoxicity at 7, 14, 21, 28 and 35 days after application of the treatments (DAT), photosynthetic activity, CO2 internal concentration, stomatal conductance, efficient water use and carboxylation efficiency. The number of spikes·m–2, spike length and number of full and sterile grains were determined in the preharvest. Thousand grain mass, grain yield and hectoliter weight were determined after harvest. The results demonstrate that the herbicide caused phytotoxicity to wheat, being greater in increasing doses and mainly before tillering, causing grain sterility and decreased productivity. The other yield components did not present difference when increasing the dose and application in different stages as well as the physiological variables. The increase of the 2,4-D doses applied before tillering and in the booting stage caused linear decrease in wheat grain yield.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 7

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

2,4-D caused wheat phytotoxicity, which was greater at increasing doses and before tillering.

Organ / stage
before tilleringe0
Treatment
herbicidee0
Outcome
phytotoxicitye0
Direction
greatere0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The results demonstrate that the herbicide caused phytotoxicity to wheat, being greater in increasing doses and mainly before tillering”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1048–1183 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

2,4-D caused grain sterility in wheat.

Treatment
2,4-Dt0
Outcome
grain sterilitye0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“causing grain sterility and decreased productivity”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1185–1235 · show in text ↑
t0

“2,4-D application interfere in the physiology and wheat grains yield components”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 23–102 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

2,4-D decreased wheat productivity.

Treatment
2,4-Dt0
Outcome
productivitye0
Direction
decreasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“causing grain sterility and decreased productivity”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1185–1235 · show in text ↑
t0

“2,4-D application interfere in the physiology and wheat grains yield components”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 23–102 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Other wheat yield components did not differ by dose and application stage.

Treatment
increasing the dose and application in different stagese0
Outcome
other yield componentse0
Direction
did not present differencee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The other yield components did not present difference when increasing the dose and application in different stages”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1237–1351 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 73–78 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Wheat physiological variables did not differ by dose and application stage.

Treatment
increasing the dose and application in different stagese0
Outcome
physiological variablese0
Direction
did not present differencee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The other yield components did not present difference when increasing the dose and application in different stages as well as the physiological variables.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1237–1391 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 73–78 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Increasing 2,4-D dose before tillering caused a linear decrease in wheat grain yield.

Treatment
increase of the 2,4-D doses applied before tilleringe0
Outcome
grain yielde0
Direction
linear decreasee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The increase of the 2,4-D doses applied before tillering and in the booting stage caused linear decrease in wheat grain yield.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1392–1518 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Increasing 2,4-D dose at booting caused a linear decrease in wheat grain yield.

Organ / stage
booting stagee0
Treatment
2,4-D doses applied before tillering and in the booting stagee0
Outcome
grain yielde0
Direction
linear decreasee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The increase of the 2,4-D doses applied before tillering and in the booting stage caused linear decrease in wheat grain yield.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1392–1518 · show in text ↑

2,4-D · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results differ

116 papers: 78 positive, 38 negative or no effect

37 papers in the same direction as this paper · 78 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. positive

112 papers more in this group

See all 116 papers →

herbicide · crop injury · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

52 papers: 20 positive, 32 negative or no effect

31 papers in the same direction as this paper · 20 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

48 papers more in this group

See all 52 papers →

tillage · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

1,414 papers: 1,116 positive, 298 negative or no effect

297 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1,116 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

1,410 papers more in this group

See all 1,414 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.